Tecno Phantom X2 Pro vs. Phantom X2: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Phantom X2 Pro edges out the X2 primarily due to its significantly brighter display. Both offer excellent performance thanks to the Dimensity 9000 chipset and impressive battery life. If outdoor visibility is a priority, the Pro is the clear winner; otherwise, the X2 provides a very similar experience at a potentially lower price.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 Pro | Tecno Phantom X2 |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2022, December 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 17 | Available. Released 2023, January 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 164.6 x 72.7 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 203 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G710 MC10 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 12, HIOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/1.5, 65mm (telephoto), 1/2.7", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom, retractable lens 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF 2 MP |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio, recording |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | 5160 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Mars Orange | Stardust Gray, Moonlight Silver |
| Models | AD9 | AD8 |
| Price | ₹ 49,999 | About 460 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 109h | Endurance rating 110h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -26.8 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 961576 (v9) GeekBench: 3984 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 973623 (v9) GeekBench: 4027 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
- Brighter Display (505 nits)
- Potentially improved camera features (based on typical Pro models)
- Premium design (likely)
- Higher Price
- Marginally lower endurance rating than X2
Tecno Phantom X2
- Excellent Battery Life (110h endurance)
- Powerful Performance (Dimensity 9000)
- Likely more affordable
- Less Bright Display (710 nits)
- Potentially fewer camera features compared to Pro
Display Comparison
The Phantom X2 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display at 505 nits compared to the X2's 710 nits. While both offer a nominal infinite contrast ratio, the higher brightness of the X2 provides a noticeable advantage in outdoor visibility. Color accuracy and overall display quality are likely comparable, but the X2's brightness is a key differentiator.
Camera Comparison
While both are advertised as having 'Photo / Video' capabilities, detailed camera specifications are missing. Based on typical Tecno implementations, expect versatile camera systems with multiple lenses (wide, ultrawide, telephoto likely on the Pro). Image quality should be comparable, but the Pro might offer slightly improved low-light performance or additional camera features.
Performance
Both devices share the same powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9000 chipset and CPU configuration. Expect smooth performance for gaming, multitasking, and demanding applications. Real-world performance differences are likely to be minimal, with both phones handling everyday tasks with ease.
Battery Life
Battery life is exceptional on both devices, with endurance ratings of 109h and 110h respectively. Charging speeds are identical at 45W, delivering a 54% charge in 20 minutes and 100% in 60 minutes. The marginal difference in endurance rating suggests very similar real-world battery performance.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro? Users who prioritize a vibrant, easily viewable display in bright sunlight and are willing to pay a premium. Who should buy the Tecno Phantom X2? Budget-conscious buyers seeking a powerful phone with excellent battery life and a solid camera system, without needing the absolute brightest screen.