Tecno Phantom X2 Pro vs. Phantom X: The Ultimate Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Phantom X2 Pro boasts a significantly more powerful chipset and faster charging, offering a noticeable performance boost. However, the Phantom X edges out with slightly better battery endurance. Ultimately, the X2 Pro is the better choice for those prioritizing speed and charging, while the X remains a strong contender for battery life champions.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 Pro | Tecno Phantom X |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | - |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2021, June 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 17 | Available. Released 2021, July 06 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front, glass back (Gorilla Glass 5) |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 163.5 x 73.8 x 8.7 mm (6.44 x 2.91 x 0.34 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 201 g (7.09 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~385 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.2 cm2 (~91.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | Super AMOLED, 90Hz |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/1.5, 65mm (telephoto), 1/2.7", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom, retractable lens 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF 13 MP, f/2.4, 50mm (telephoto), PDAF, 2x optical zoom 8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 48 MP, f/2.2, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm 8 MP, f/2.2, 105˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm |
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 33W wired, 70% in 30 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | 4700 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Mars Orange | Starry Night Blue, Monet Summer |
| Models | AD9 | AC8 |
| Price | ₹ 49,999 | About 470 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 109h | Endurance rating 122h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -26.7 LUFS (Good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 961576 (v9) GeekBench: 3984 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 309055 (v8) GeekBench: 1670 (v5.1) GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
- Significantly faster performance
- Brighter display
- Faster charging (45W)
- Modern chipset (Dimensity 9000)
- Slightly lower battery endurance than X
- Potentially higher price
Tecno Phantom X
- Excellent battery life (122h endurance)
- More affordable
- Solid all-around performance
- Slower charging (33W)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G95)
- Dimmer display
Display Comparison
The Phantom X2 Pro's display shines with a measured peak brightness of 505 nits, significantly brighter than the Phantom X's 405 nits. This translates to better visibility in direct sunlight. Both phones feature an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term indicating very high contrast), but the X2 Pro's higher brightness gives it a visual edge. Both likely use AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as having capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons are difficult without extensive testing. The X2 Pro likely benefits from its more powerful processor for improved image processing. Expect both to offer a variety of shooting modes and decent image quality in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is likely improved on the X2 Pro.
Performance
This is where the X2 Pro truly pulls ahead. The Mediatek Dimensity 9000 chipset is a powerhouse, utilizing a 4nm process for efficiency and performance. Compared to the Phantom X's Helio G95 (12nm), the X2 Pro offers a substantial upgrade in processing power, resulting in smoother multitasking, faster app loading, and better gaming performance. The CPU architecture also favors the X2 Pro.
Battery Life
The Phantom X holds a slight advantage in battery endurance, boasting an impressive 122h rating compared to the X2 Pro's 109h. However, the X2 Pro's 45W charging is significantly faster, reaching 54% in 20 minutes and 100% in 60 minutes, while the X takes longer with its 33W charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro? Gamers, power users, and anyone who values fast charging and a smooth experience will appreciate the X2 Pro's superior performance. Who should buy the Tecno Phantom X? Budget-conscious buyers prioritizing exceptional battery life and a solid all-around experience will find the Phantom X a compelling option.