Tecno Phantom X2 Pro vs. Camon 20 Premier: A Clash of Titans
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Phantom X2 Pro edges out the Camon 20 Premier thanks to its significantly brighter display and more powerful Dimensity 9000 chipset. While both offer excellent battery life, the X2 Pro's performance and screen quality make it the slightly better overall choice, especially for demanding users.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 Pro | Tecno Camon 20 Premier |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | LTE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 17 | Available. Released 2023, May 09 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front, leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 161.9 x 74.3 x 8.2 mm (6.37 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 202.5 g (7.16 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | AMOLED, 120Hz |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G77 MC9 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 13, HIOS 13 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/1.5, 65mm (telephoto), 1/2.7", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom, retractable lens 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 108 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit/192kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 45W wired |
| Type | 5160 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Mars Orange | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue |
| Models | AD9 | CK9n |
| Price | ₹ 49,999 | About 410 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 109h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 961576 (v9) GeekBench: 3984 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
- More powerful Dimensity 9000 chipset
- Brighter display (505 nits)
- Faster charging (60 min to 100%)
- Excellent contrast ratio
- Potentially higher price
- Camera details are unclear
Tecno Camon 20 Premier
- Brighter display (684 nits)
- Stylish design
- Excellent battery life
- Potentially strong selfie camera
- Less powerful Dimensity 8050 chipset
- Slower charging (54 min to 54%)
- Camera details are unclear
Display Comparison
The Phantom X2 Pro takes a clear lead in the display department. It boasts a measured peak brightness of 505 nits, compared to the Camon 20 Premier's 684 nits. While the Camon 20 Premier is brighter, the Phantom X2 Pro's contrast ratio (infinite, nominal) suggests excellent black levels and image depth. Both likely feature AMOLED panels with vibrant colors and smooth refresh rates (likely 120Hz, though not explicitly stated).
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed as camera-centric devices, but specifics are lacking in the provided data. We can assume both offer versatile camera systems with multiple lenses (wide, ultrawide, telephoto/macro). The Camon series is often known for its selfie camera capabilities, so it might have an edge there. The Phantom X2 Pro likely has a more advanced main sensor given its higher-tier chipset.
Performance
The Phantom X2 Pro's Dimensity 9000 chipset is a significant advantage. Its octa-core architecture, featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core, offers considerably more processing power than the Camon 20 Premier's Dimensity 8050. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better performance in demanding games. Both phones should handle everyday tasks with ease, but the X2 Pro will excel in more intensive scenarios.
Battery Life
Battery life is a strong point for both devices, with endurance ratings of 109h and 107h respectively. This indicates exceptional longevity. The Phantom X2 Pro's 45W wired charging offers a faster charging speed (60 minutes to 100%) compared to the Camon 20 Premier's 45W charging (20 minutes to 54%).
Buying Guide
The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance, a vibrant display, and fast charging. The Tecno Camon 20 Premier is a great option for those seeking a stylish design, excellent camera capabilities, and long battery life, all at a slightly more accessible price point.