Tecno Phantom X2 Pro vs Infinix Zero Ultra: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Infinix Zero Ultra takes the crown for charging speed and potentially display technology, while the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro boasts a significantly better chipset and exceptional battery life. Ultimately, the choice depends on whether you prioritize blazing-fast charging or sustained performance and longevity.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 Pro | Infinix Zero Ultra |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA 42.2/11.5 Mbps, LTE Cat7 300/75 Mbps, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2022, October 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 17 | Available. Released 2022, October 25 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | - |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 165.5 x 74.5 x 8.8 mm - Coslight Silver165.5 x 75.1 x 9.2 mm - Genesis Noir |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 213 g (7.51 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | AMOLED, 120Hz, 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 12, XOS 12 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/1.5, 65mm (telephoto), 1/2.7", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom, retractable lens 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF | 200 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/1.22", 0.64µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.4, (ultrawide), AF 2 MP |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.0, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 180W wired, 100% in 12 min |
| Type | 5160 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Mars Orange | Coslight Silver, Genesis Noir |
| Models | AD9 | X6820 |
| Price | ₹ 49,999 | About 500 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 109h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 961576 (v9) GeekBench: 3984 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
- Superior Chipset (Dimensity 9000)
- Exceptional Battery Life (109h Endurance)
- Potentially better camera processing
- Good Brightness (505 nits)
- Charging speed is slower (45W)
- Display contrast ratio claim is nominal
- Design may not be as premium as Zero Ultra
Infinix Zero Ultra
- Blazing-Fast Charging (180W)
- Potentially better display (3D curved, higher resolution)
- Sleek Design
- Smooth performance for everyday tasks
- Weaker Chipset (Dimensity 920)
- Battery life likely shorter than X2 Pro
- Camera performance potentially lower than X2 Pro
Display Comparison
Both phones feature AMOLED displays, but the Infinix Zero Ultra is rumored to have a 3D curved display with a higher resolution and potentially better color accuracy. The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro's 505 nits brightness is respectable, but the Zero Ultra likely offers superior outdoor visibility. Contrast ratio is listed as 'infinite' for the Phantom X2 Pro, which is a nominal value and doesn't provide concrete data.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited, but both phones are expected to offer versatile camera setups. The Phantom X2 Pro likely has a more advanced image processing pipeline due to its more powerful chipset. Both phones should be capable of capturing good quality photos and videos in various conditions.
Performance
The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro's Dimensity 9000 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Infinix Zero Ultra's Dimensity 920. The X2 Pro's CPU configuration, particularly the Cortex-X2 core, provides a noticeable performance advantage in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Zero Ultra will still handle everyday tasks smoothly, but won't match the X2 Pro's raw power.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro's battery life is truly exceptional, boasting an endurance rating of 109 hours. This is a massive advantage. The Infinix Zero Ultra's 180W charging is revolutionary, allowing it to reach 100% in just 12 minutes, but it remains to be seen how this impacts long-term battery health.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro is ideal for users who prioritize performance, long battery life, and a strong camera system. The Infinix Zero Ultra is best suited for those who demand incredibly fast charging and are willing to trade off some performance for that convenience.