Honor Magic5 Pro vs Tecno Phantom X2 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Magic5 Pro emerges as the superior choice. Its Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge, coupled with a significantly brighter display and faster charging capabilities. While the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro offers strong value, the Magic5 Pro’s overall refinement justifies the price difference.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 Pro | Honor Magic5 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 - China |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA - China |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2023, February 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 17 | Available. Released 2023, March 31 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front, glass back or eco leather back |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM + eSIM (max 2 at a time) |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 219 g (7.72 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1312 x 2848 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.81 inches, 113.7 cm2 (~91.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 14, MagicOS 8 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 4.0 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, color spectrum sensor, LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/1.5, 65mm (telephoto), 1/2.7", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom, retractable lens 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.6, 23mm (wide), 1/1.12" 1.4µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/3.0, 90mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, OIS, 3.5x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", AF TOF 3D (depth) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10, 10-bit video |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 12 MP, f/2.4, 100˚ (ultrawide), 1.22µm TOF 3D, (depth/biometrics sensor) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| - | 24-bit audio stereo recording | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a) |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, DisplayPort 1.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), Face ID, accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 66W wired 50W wireless Reverse wireless 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Market-dependent versions:· Li-Po 5100 mAh (Global)· Si/C Li-Ion 5450 mAh (China only) |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Mars Orange | Black, Meadow Green, Blue, Purple, Orange |
| Models | AD9 | PGT-AN10, PGT-N19 |
| Price | ₹ 49,999 | £ 799.99 / € 407.79 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 109h | Endurance rating 109h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -24.6 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 961576 (v9) GeekBench: 3984 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | GeekBench: 4378 (v5.1), 5096 (v6) |
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
- More affordable price point
- Respectable performance with Dimensity 9000
- Decent battery endurance
- Significantly dimmer display
- Slower charging speeds
- Potentially less refined camera system
Honor Magic5 Pro
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Much brighter and likely more efficient display
- Faster wired and wireless charging
- Higher price tag
- May not represent a massive leap over previous generation flagships for some users
- Software experience can be polarizing (Honor UI)
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic5 Pro’s display is a clear standout, achieving a measured peak brightness of 1227 nits compared to the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro’s 505 nits. This translates to vastly superior visibility in direct sunlight. Both displays share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting deep blacks, but the Honor’s higher brightness fundamentally improves the viewing experience. While both likely employ OLED technology, the Magic5 Pro’s superior brightness and potential for LTPO (though not explicitly stated in the data) suggest a more dynamic and power-efficient panel. The Tecno’s lower brightness may be acceptable for indoor use, but the Honor offers a more versatile display.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but detailed sensor information is absent. However, given the Magic5 Pro’s positioning, it likely incorporates a larger main sensor and more sophisticated image processing algorithms. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) is also more advanced, enabling better low-light performance and dynamic range. Without specific sensor details, it’s difficult to make definitive claims, but the Honor’s overall hardware and software ecosystem suggests a more refined camera experience. The Tecno’s camera is likely capable, but the Magic5 Pro is expected to deliver superior image quality and video stabilization.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Honor Magic5 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) boasts a Cortex-X3 prime core clocked at 3.2 GHz, exceeding the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro’s Dimensity 9000’s 3.05 GHz Cortex-X2. The Snapdragon also features a more modern CPU architecture with the Cortex-A715 cores, offering improved efficiency and performance over the Dimensity’s A710 cores. While both are 4nm chips, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 generally exhibits better thermal management, reducing the likelihood of performance throttling during sustained workloads. This benefits gamers and users running demanding applications. The Honor’s LPDDR5x RAM (implied by its flagship status) further enhances memory bandwidth, contributing to smoother multitasking.
Battery Life
The Honor Magic5 Pro’s active use score of 12:06h indicates superior real-world battery life compared to the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro’s endurance rating of 109 hours (which is a different metric). While both have an endurance rating of 109h, the active use score provides a more practical assessment. The Honor also boasts significantly faster charging: 66W wired, 50W wireless, and even reverse wireless charging, compared to the Tecno’s 45W wired charging. This means the Honor can be fully charged in less time and offers greater flexibility with wireless charging options. The Tecno’s 45W charging is respectable, reaching 100% in 60 minutes, but the Honor’s faster speeds are a clear advantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro if you prioritize value and a respectable, if not class-leading, experience. It’s ideal for users who enjoy media consumption and casual gaming without demanding the absolute highest frame rates. Buy the Honor Magic5 Pro if you demand peak performance, a stunningly bright and color-accurate display, and the convenience of faster wired and wireless charging. This phone is geared towards power users, mobile gamers, and photography enthusiasts.