Tecno Phantom X2 Pro vs. Google Pixel 7 Pro: A Deep Dive into Flagship Features
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera versatility and software experience, the Google Pixel 7 Pro is the stronger choice. However, the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro delivers superior raw performance and significantly faster charging, making it ideal for power users and gamers.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom X2 Pro | Google Pixel 7 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 - GE2AE |
| 5G bands | 1, 3, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 71, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - GE2AE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GP4BC | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2022, December 07 | 2022, October 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, January 17 | Available. Released 2022, October 13 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame, plastic back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 164.6 x 72.7 x 9 mm (6.48 x 2.86 x 0.35 in) | 162.9 x 76.6 x 8.9 mm (6.41 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 201 g (7.09 oz) | 212 g (7.48 oz) |
| - | IP68 dust/water resistant (up to 1.5m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) | 1440 x 3120 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~512 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 111.6 cm2 (~93.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 110.6 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 500 nits | LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| - | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 12 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 128GB 12GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/1.5, 65mm (telephoto), 1/2.7", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2.5x optical zoom, retractable lens 13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/1.3", 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.9, 25mm (wide), 1/1.31", 1.2µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 48 MP, f/3.5, 120mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.55", 0.7µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 12 MP, f/2.2, 126˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.9", 1.25µm, AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps; gyro-EIS, OIS, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 21mm (ultrawide), 1/3.1", 1.22µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 54% in 20 min, 100% in 60 min | 23W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 30 min 23W wireless Reverse wireless |
| Type | 5160 mAh | Li-Ion 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Stardust Gray, Mars Orange | Obsidian, Snow, Hazel |
| Models | AD9 | GP4BC, GE2AE, GFE4J |
| Price | ₹ 49,999 | € 248.84 / $ 204.00 / £ 259.99 / ₹ 36,999 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 109h | Endurance rating 83h |
| Camera | Photo / Video | Photo / Video |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | -29.3 LUFS (Average) | -24.8 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 961576 (v9) GeekBench: 3984 (v5.1) GFXBench: 71fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | AnTuTu: 796369 (v9) GeekBench: 3187 (v5.1) GFXBench: 34fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Phantom X2 Pro
- Superior raw processing power with Dimensity 9000
- Significantly faster 45W wired charging
- Longer battery endurance (109 hours)
- Lower peak display brightness
- Less refined software experience compared to Pixel
Google Pixel 7 Pro
- Exceptional camera quality and computational photography
- Brighter display for outdoor visibility
- Wireless charging and reverse wireless power share
- Slower charging speeds (23W wired)
- Less powerful chipset for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display at 1090 nits compared to the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro’s 505 nits. This translates to better outdoor visibility in direct sunlight for the Pixel. Both displays share an infinite (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting excellent black levels. While neither specification details refresh rate, the Pixel 7 Pro is known to feature an adaptive 120Hz LTPO panel, which dynamically adjusts refresh rate to conserve battery – a feature likely absent on the Tecno, potentially impacting endurance.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer photo and video capabilities, but their approaches differ. The Pixel 7 Pro leverages Google’s renowned computational photography algorithms for consistently excellent image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. While sensor sizes aren’t specified, the Pixel 7 Pro’s image processing pipeline is a significant strength. The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro’s camera performance is less well-documented, but the Dimensity 9000’s ISP capabilities suggest strong potential. Without detailed sensor information, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Pixel 7 Pro’s established track record gives it an edge.
Performance
The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9000 (4nm), featuring a Cortex-X2 prime core clocked at 3.05 GHz. The Pixel 7 Pro employs Google’s Tensor G2 (5nm). While the Tensor G2 excels in AI and machine learning tasks, the Dimensity 9000 generally outperforms it in raw CPU and GPU benchmarks. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9000 also offers better thermal efficiency than the 5nm Tensor G2, potentially leading to less throttling during sustained workloads. The Pixel 7 Pro’s CPU configuration (2x Cortex-X1, 2x Cortex-A78, 4x Cortex-A55) is older architecture than the Tecno’s, further highlighting the performance advantage of the Dimensity 9000.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom X2 Pro achieves an endurance rating of 109 hours, significantly exceeding the Pixel 7 Pro’s 83 hours. This advantage is partially attributable to the Dimensity 9000’s efficiency and potentially a larger battery capacity (not specified). However, the Tecno also boasts 45W wired charging, reaching 54% in 20 minutes and 100% in 60 minutes, a substantial improvement over the Pixel 7 Pro’s 23W wired charging (50% in 30 minutes). The Pixel 7 Pro adds the convenience of 23W wireless charging and reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Tecno.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Phantom X2 Pro if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding tasks like gaming or video editing, and value rapid 45W charging. Buy the Google Pixel 7 Pro if you prefer a refined software experience, exceptional camera capabilities with Google’s computational photography, and the convenience of wireless charging and reverse wireless power share.