Tecno Phantom V Fold vs Honor Magic Vs Ultimate: The Ultimate Foldable Face-Off
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate edges out the Tecno Phantom V Fold thanks to its superior Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset and faster 66W charging. While the Phantom V Fold boasts impressive battery endurance, the Magic Vs Ultimate offers a more refined overall package for performance and charging speed.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom V Fold | Honor Magic Vs Ultimate |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1x | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 28 | 2022, November 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 12 | Available. Released 2022, December 30 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front folded (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front, glass back, magnesium alloy frame, titanium alloy folding mechanism |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 159.4 x 140.4 x 6.9 mmFolded: 159.4 x 72 x 14.2-14.5 mm | Unfolded: 160.3 x 141.5 x 6.1 mmFolded: 160.3 x 72.6 x 12.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 299 g (10.55 oz) | 265 g (9.35 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2000 x 2296 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1984 x 2272 pixels (~382 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.85 inches, 196.9 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.9 inches, 199.5 cm2 (~87.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (peak) | Foldable OLED, 1B colors, 90Hz, HDR10+, 800 nits |
| Cover display: LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (peak), Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 6.42 inches, 1080 x 2550 pixels, 431 PPI | Stylus support Cover display: OLED (nano glass-ceramic cover), 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits, 6.45 inches, 1080 x 2560 pixels, 431 ppi | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.75 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8475 Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Adreno 730 |
| OS | Android 13, HiOS 13 Fold | Android 12, MagicOS 7 |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | - | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF | 54 MP, f/1.9, 27mm (wide), 1/1.49", 1.0µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, (telephoto), PDAF, 3x optical zoom, OIS 50 MP, f/2.0, 13mm, 122˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps (10-bit), 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG, Display Port 1.2 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min, 100% in 55 min | 66W wired 5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Gold, Black |
| Models | AD10 | FRI-AN10 |
| Price | About 1030 EUR | About 1500 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 92h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 999348 (v9) GeekBench: 3963 (v5.1), 3748 (v6) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- Exceptional battery life (92h endurance)
- More affordable than the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Decent display brightness (492 nits)
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 9000+)
- Camera performance details are limited
- Slower charging speed (45W)
Honor Magic Vs Ultimate
- Superior performance (Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1)
- Faster charging (66W)
- Generally more refined design and software
- Higher price point
- Battery life likely less than Phantom V Fold
- Camera details are limited
Display Comparison
Both devices feature foldable AMOLED displays, but the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate generally receives praise for its slightly more refined panel and slimmer hinge. The Tecno Phantom V Fold's display brightness is measured at 492 nits, which is decent but potentially less vibrant than the Magic Vs Ultimate's. The Phantom V Fold boasts an 'infinite' contrast ratio (nominal), suggesting excellent blacks, but real-world performance needs further evaluation.
Camera Comparison
Camera details are limited for both devices in the provided data. However, based on general knowledge, the Honor Magic Vs Ultimate typically features a more advanced camera system with better image processing capabilities. Both are expected to offer versatile camera setups, including wide, ultrawide, and telephoto lenses. Further testing is needed to determine the definitive winner.
Performance
The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate holds a clear advantage here. Its Qualcomm Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 chipset is significantly more powerful than the Tecno Phantom V Fold's Mediatek Dimensity 9000+. Expect smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance on the Magic Vs Ultimate. Both phones utilize similar CPU core configurations, but the Snapdragon's GPU is a notable upgrade.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom V Fold shines in this category. Its endurance rating of 92h is exceptionally high, suggesting outstanding battery life. The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate, while offering 66W wired charging (reaching 100% in approximately 45 minutes), likely won't match the Phantom V Fold's longevity on a single charge. The Phantom V Fold's 45W charging is still respectable.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Phantom V Fold is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a more budget-friendly foldable experience. The Honor Magic Vs Ultimate is best suited for those seeking top-tier performance, faster charging, and a more polished software experience, willing to pay a premium.