Tecno Phantom V Fold vs. Google Pixel Fold: A Detailed Showdown
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Tecno Phantom V Fold offers incredible value with its exceptional battery life and powerful chipset at a lower price point. However, the Google Pixel Fold shines with its superior camera, cleaner software experience, and Google's ecosystem integration. Ultimately, the Pixel Fold is the better overall device, but the Phantom V Fold is a compelling budget-friendly alternative.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Phantom V Fold | Google Pixel Fold |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 46, 48, 66, 71 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 257, 258, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, February 28 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, April 12 | Available. Released 2023, June 27 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front folded (Gorilla Glass Victus), plastic back, aluminum frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus) (folded), plastic front (unfolded), glass back (Gorilla Glass Victus), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 159.4 x 140.4 x 6.9 mmFolded: 159.4 x 72 x 14.2-14.5 mm | Unfolded: 139.7 x 158.7 x 5.8 mmFolded: 139.7 x 79.5 x 12.1 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | 299 g (10.55 oz) | 283 g (9.98 oz) |
| - | IPX8 water resistant | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Resolution | 2000 x 2296 pixels (~388 ppi density) | 1840 x 2208 pixels (~378 ppi density) |
| Size | 7.85 inches, 196.9 cm2 (~88.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 7.6 inches, 183.3 cm2 (~82.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (peak) | Foldable OLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1450 nits (peak) |
| Cover display: LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 1100 nits (peak), Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 6.42 inches, 1080 x 2550 pixels, 431 PPI | Cover display: OLED, 120Hz, HDR, Corning Gorilla Glass Victus 5.8 inches, 1080 x 2092 pixels, 17.4:9 ratio, 408 ppi 1200 nits (HBM), 1550 nits (peak) | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.20 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ (4 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G710 MC10 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, HiOS 13 Fold | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| UFS 3.1 | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, PDAF 50 MP, f/2.0, (telephoto), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x optical zoom 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF | 48 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 10.8 MP, f/3.1, 112mm (telephoto), 1/3.1", 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS, 5x optical zoom 10.8 MP, f/2.2, 121˚, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.25µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 10-bit HDR |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 1.12µm Cover camera: 32 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 24mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm Cover camera: 9.5 MP, f/2.2, 24mm (wide), 1.22µm, dual pixel PDAF |
| Video | 1080p@60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio, recording | No |
| USB | USB Type-C, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| - | Ultra Wideband (UWB) support | |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 40% in 15 min, 100% in 55 min | Wired, PD3.0 Wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4821 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Black, White | Porcelain, Obsidian |
| Models | AD10 | G9FPL |
| Price | About 1030 EUR | € 670.87 / $ 389.26 / £ 899.99 |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | Endurance rating 92h | - |
| Camera | Photo / Video | - |
| Display | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker | -24.3 LUFS (Very good) | - |
| Performance | AnTuTu: 999348 (v9) GeekBench: 3963 (v5.1), 3748 (v6) GFXBench: 45fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Tecno Phantom V Fold
- Exceptional Battery Life (92h Endurance)
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 9000+ Chipset
- Faster 45W Wired Charging
- More Affordable Price Point
- Camera Performance Lags Behind Pixel Fold
- Software Experience Less Polished
- Potential for Software Updates to be Slower
Google Pixel Fold
- Superior Camera Quality and Computational Photography
- Clean and Intuitive Android Experience
- Google Ecosystem Integration
- Premium Build Quality
- Shorter Battery Life
- Slower Charging Speed
- Higher Price Point
- Tensor G2 may not match Dimensity 9000+ in raw power
Display Comparison
The Tecno Phantom V Fold boasts a measured peak brightness of 492 nits, while the Pixel Fold's brightness is generally considered slightly lower, though it offers excellent color accuracy. Both devices feature vibrant OLED displays with high refresh rates, but the Pixel Fold's display is generally considered to have better calibration and viewing angles. The Phantom V Fold's contrast ratio is listed as 'Infinite' (nominal), suggesting excellent contrast, but lacks specific measurements.
Camera Comparison
This is where the Google Pixel Fold truly excels. Google's computational photography is renowned, delivering exceptional image quality, particularly in challenging lighting conditions. The Phantom V Fold's camera is capable, but doesn't match the Pixel Fold's consistency and overall image processing. The Pixel Fold also benefits from Google's software features like Magic Eraser and Photo Unblur.
Performance
The Tecno Phantom V Fold utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 9000+, a powerful chipset that delivers impressive performance for gaming and multitasking. The Google Pixel Fold, powered by the Google Tensor G2, prioritizes AI and machine learning tasks, offering smooth performance but potentially falling slightly behind the Dimensity 9000+ in raw graphical power. Both are capable of handling demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom V Fold absolutely dominates in battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 92 hours – a truly remarkable figure. The Google Pixel Fold's battery life is respectable, but significantly shorter, likely falling in the 10-12 hour range with moderate usage. The Phantom V Fold's 45W wired charging is also faster than the Pixel Fold's PD3.0 charging.
Buying Guide
Who should buy the Tecno Phantom V Fold? Users prioritizing battery life, raw performance, and a more affordable foldable experience. Who should buy the Google Pixel Fold? Those seeking a premium foldable with a top-tier camera, seamless software integration, and Google's unique features.