The foldable phone market is heating up, with the Tecno Phantom V Flip and Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 representing compelling options at different price points. The Phantom V Flip aims to deliver a strong feature set at a more accessible price, while the Mix Flip 2 leverages Qualcomm’s latest Snapdragon 8 Elite to offer flagship-level performance in a compact form factor. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which foldable best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 is the clear winner, thanks to its Snapdragon 8 Elite chipset and faster charging. However, the Tecno Phantom V Flip offers excellent endurance and a competitive feature set at a potentially lower price, making it a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 80, 81, 83, 84, 89 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 22 | 2025, June 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 01 | Available. Released 2025, June 26 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Eco leather back, aluminum frame, steel hinge | - |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.7 x 74.1 x 7 mmFolded: 88.8 x 74.1 x 15 mm | Unfolded: 166.9 x 73.8 x 7.6 mmFolded: 86.1 x 73.8 x 15.9 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 199 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1224 x 2912 pixels (~460 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.86 inches, 108.5 cm2 (~88.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, HDR Vivid, 120Hz, 3200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x4.32 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix L + 6x3.53 GHz Oryon V2 Phoenix M) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8750-AB Snapdragon 8 Elite (3 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 830 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13.5 | Android 15, HyperOS 2 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), PDAF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, LED flash, panorama, HDR, Leica lenses |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240/960fps, Dolby Vision HDR |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | Dolby Vision HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.0, 21mm (wide), 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, LHDC |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 15 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4
50W wireless |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Si/C Li-Ion 5165 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iconic Black, Mystic Dawn | White, Purple, Green, Checkered Gold |
| Models | AD11 | 2505APX7BC |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 720 EUR |
Tecno Phantom V Flip
- Exceptional battery endurance (88h rating)
- Competitive price point
- Fast 45W wired charging
- Less powerful chipset (Dimensity 8050)
- Limited camera details suggest a less advanced system
Xiaomi Mix Flip 2
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 8 Elite)
- Ultra-fast 67W wired and 50W wireless charging
- Likely superior display quality and camera system
- Potentially lower battery endurance compared to Tecno
- Higher price tag
Display Comparison
The Tecno Phantom V Flip boasts a measured peak brightness of 818 nits, a respectable figure for outdoor visibility. While the Mix Flip 2’s display specifications aren’t provided, Xiaomi typically employs high-quality panels. The absence of LTPO information for either device suggests both may not dynamically adjust refresh rates for optimal power efficiency. The key difference will likely be color accuracy and calibration, areas where Xiaomi often excels. Bezels are a critical factor in the foldable experience, and a detailed side-by-side comparison would be needed to determine which device minimizes them more effectively.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but specific details are lacking. Without sensor size, aperture, or OIS information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, Xiaomi generally prioritizes camera performance in its flagship devices, suggesting the Mix Flip 2 likely has a more advanced camera system. The absence of details on the Tecno Phantom V Flip’s camera suggests it may be a more modest offering, focusing on versatility rather than outright image quality. We can assume both will offer standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the quality of these modes will likely differ significantly.
Performance
The Xiaomi Mix Flip 2’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite (3nm) represents a significant leap in performance and efficiency over the Tecno Phantom V Flip’s MediaTek Dimensity 8050 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8 Elite utilizes a custom Oryon CPU architecture, delivering higher clock speeds (up to 4.32 GHz) and improved IPC (Instructions Per Cycle) compared to the Dimensity 8050’s Cortex-A78 cores. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 3nm process node further enhances thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during sustained workloads. While the Dimensity 8050 is a capable chip, it simply cannot match the Snapdragon 8 Elite’s raw power.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom V Flip’s endurance rating of 88 hours is impressive, indicating excellent battery life. However, this is an endurance *rating*, not raw mAh capacity. The Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 compensates for potentially lower endurance with significantly faster charging: 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, and 50W wireless. The Phantom V Flip offers 45W wired charging, with a claimed 50% charge in 15 minutes. The Mix Flip 2’s wireless charging capability is a major advantage, offering convenient top-ups. The faster charging speeds of the Mix Flip 2 could mitigate any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Phantom V Flip if you need exceptional battery life and a feature-rich experience without breaking the bank. It’s ideal for users who prioritize longevity and don’t demand the absolute highest processing power. Buy the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 if you prefer a premium, high-performance foldable with blazing-fast charging and a more advanced chipset, catering to power users and mobile gamers.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8050 in the Tecno Phantom V Flip struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 8050 is a capable chip, it may require reduced graphics settings and frame rate caps to maintain a smooth experience in graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact. The Snapdragon 8 Elite in the Mix Flip 2 will offer a significantly smoother and more consistent gaming experience at higher settings.
❓ How does the 67W charging on the Xiaomi Mix Flip 2 compare to the 45W charging on the Tecno Phantom V Flip in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Mix Flip 2 will noticeably reduce charging times. Expect a full charge in under 40 minutes, compared to potentially over an hour for the Phantom V Flip. This difference is particularly beneficial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Is the lack of LTPO on either device a significant drawback?
The absence of LTPO means neither device can dynamically adjust its refresh rate to conserve battery life. This could result in slightly higher power consumption, especially when displaying static content. However, the impact is likely to be minimal for most users.
❓ What kind of software support can I expect from Tecno and Xiaomi for these devices?
Xiaomi generally offers more consistent and longer-term software support, including Android updates and security patches, compared to Tecno. This is a key consideration for users who prioritize long-term usability and security.
