The flip phone form factor is back, and the Tecno Phantom V Flip and Oppo Find N3 Flip represent two distinct approaches. Tecno aims to disrupt with aggressive pricing, while Oppo focuses on a premium experience. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which foldable best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Oppo Find N3 Flip emerges as the superior choice. Its more efficient Dimensity 9200 chipset, brighter display, and slightly better battery endurance justify the price premium. However, the Tecno Phantom V Flip offers compelling value for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 22 | 2023, August 29 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 01 | Available. Released 2023, September 08 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Eco leather back, aluminum frame, steel hinge | Plastic front (unfolded), glass back (unfolded), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.7 x 74.1 x 7 mmFolded: 88.8 x 74.1 x 15 mm | Unfolded: 166.4 x 75.8 x 7.8 mm Folded: 85.5 x 75.8 x 16.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 198 g (6.98 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2520 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~403 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~85.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, HDR10+, 1200 nits (HBM), 1600 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.05 GHz Cortex-X3 & 3x2.85 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Immortalis-G715 MC11 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13.5 | Android 13, up to 4 major Android upgrades, ColorOS 14 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm | - |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
32 MP, f/2.0, 47mm (telephoto), 2x optical zoom, PDAF
48 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 21mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm, AF |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30; gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct - InternationalWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct - China only |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 15 min | 44W wired, 50% in 23 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4300 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iconic Black, Mystic Dawn | Cream Gold, Misty Pink, Sleek Black |
| Models | AD11 | PHT110, CPH2519 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | About 1200 EUR |
Tecno Phantom V Flip
- Faster 45W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Competitive performance for the price
- Less efficient Dimensity 8050 chipset
- Dimmer display compared to Oppo
- Potentially less refined camera processing
Oppo Find N3 Flip
- More powerful and efficient Dimensity 9200 chipset
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Longer battery life and reverse charging
- Higher price tag
- Slower charging speed (44W)
- May be overkill for basic users
Display Comparison
The Oppo Find N3 Flip boasts a significantly brighter display at 939 nits compared to the Tecno Phantom V Flip’s 818 nits. This translates to better outdoor visibility, especially under direct sunlight. While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the higher brightness of the Oppo panel provides a more vivid and engaging viewing experience. We expect both to have similar color accuracy, but the Oppo’s brightness is a clear advantage. The absence of detailed refresh rate information for both necessitates further testing, but both are expected to support adaptive refresh rates for power efficiency.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Given the market positioning, we anticipate the Oppo Find N3 Flip to have a more refined image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensors. While both are advertised as capable of photo and video, the Dimensity 9200’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Oppo will likely result in better dynamic range and low-light performance. The absence of specific aperture or sensor size details prevents a definitive judgment, but Oppo’s history suggests a stronger focus on camera quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Tecno Phantom V Flip utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6nm), while the Oppo Find N3 Flip features the more advanced Mediatek Dimensity 9200 (4nm). The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 9200 offers superior power efficiency and thermal performance, meaning less throttling during sustained workloads. The Dimensity 9200’s Cortex-X3 prime core (3.05 GHz) also provides a noticeable performance uplift over the Phantom V Flip’s Cortex-A78 (3.0 GHz). This benefits demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, making the Oppo a better choice for power users. The Oppo also benefits from a newer CPU architecture (Cortex-A715 vs A78).
Battery Life
The Oppo Find N3 Flip demonstrates superior battery endurance with an active use score of 12:58h and an endurance rating of 92h, compared to the Tecno Phantom V Flip’s 88h endurance rating. While the Tecno offers faster wired charging at 45W (50% in 15 minutes), the Oppo’s more efficient chipset and potentially optimized software contribute to longer real-world battery life. The Oppo also supports reverse wired charging, a convenient feature for topping up accessories. The 8-minute difference to 50% charge isn't significant enough to offset the longer overall battery life of the Oppo.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Phantom V Flip if you prioritize affordability and a fast-charging experience, and are willing to compromise on peak performance and display quality. Buy the Oppo Find N3 Flip if you demand a refined user experience, a brighter and more vibrant display, and a more powerful processor for demanding tasks and longer-term software support.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8050 in the Tecno Phantom V Flip struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
While the Dimensity 8050 is a capable chipset, it may exhibit some throttling during extended gaming sessions with graphically intensive titles like Genshin Impact. Expect playable frame rates with medium settings, but the Oppo Find N3 Flip’s Dimensity 9200 will provide a smoother and more consistent experience.
❓ How does the hinge durability compare between the Tecno Phantom V Flip and the Oppo Find N3 Flip?
Both manufacturers claim robust hinge designs capable of withstanding hundreds of thousands of folds. However, Oppo has a longer track record with foldable devices, suggesting potentially more refined hinge engineering and quality control. Long-term durability testing is needed to definitively assess the differences.
❓ Is the 45W charging on the Tecno Phantom V Flip significantly faster in real-world use than the 44W on the Oppo?
The difference in charging wattage is minimal, and the Oppo's more efficient power management may offset the slight advantage of the Tecno. The 8-minute difference to reach 50% charge is unlikely to be noticeable for most users.
❓ Does either phone support wireless charging?
Neither the Tecno Phantom V Flip nor the Oppo Find N3 Flip officially support wireless charging, focusing instead on fast wired charging solutions.
