The clamshell foldable market is heating up, with the Tecno Phantom V Flip and Motorola Razr 40 vying for attention. Both offer a nostalgic form factor with modern smartphone capabilities, but they diverge significantly in their internal hardware and target audience. This comparison dives deep into the specs and real-world implications to determine which flip phone delivers the best experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and faster charging, the Tecno Phantom V Flip emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8050 chipset provides a noticeable edge, and the 45W charging is significantly quicker than the Razr 40’s 30W. However, the Motorola Razr 40’s brighter display is a compelling advantage for outdoor visibility.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 22 | 2023, June 01 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 01 | Available. Released 2023, June 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Eco leather back, aluminum frame, steel hinge | Plastic front (unfolded), plastic front (folded), plastic back, aluminum frame (7000 series), hinge (stainless steel) |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.7 x 74.1 x 7 mmFolded: 88.8 x 74.1 x 15 mm | Unfolded: 170.8 x 74 x 7.4 mmFolded: 88.2 x 74 x 15.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 188.6 g (6.67 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1400 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.36 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 644 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13.5 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | Laser AF, LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, 25mm (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, dual-band or tri-band (region dependent) |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 15 min | 30W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Li-Po 4200 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iconic Black, Mystic Dawn | Sage Green, Vanilla Cream, Summer Lilac, Grape Compote, Cherry Blossom |
| Models | AD11 | XT2323-2 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | € 479.49 / $ 209.90 |
Tecno Phantom V Flip
- Faster 45W charging for quick top-ups
- More powerful Dimensity 8050 chipset for better performance
- Competitive endurance rating
- Lower peak display brightness compared to the Razr 40
- 6nm process may result in slightly higher thermal output
Motorola Razr 40
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility
- More efficient 4nm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 chipset
- Potential for cleaner software experience (Motorola's near-stock Android)
- Slower 30W wired charging
- Less powerful chipset compared to the Dimensity 8050
Display Comparison
The Motorola Razr 40 immediately stands out with its significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1064 nits compared to the Tecno Phantom V Flip’s 818 nits. This translates to superior readability outdoors under direct sunlight. While both utilize OLED technology, the difference in peak brightness is substantial. We lack data on refresh rates or panel type (LTPO vs standard OLED) for either device, but the brightness gap is a clear win for the Razr 40. Users who frequently consume media outdoors will greatly benefit from the Razr 40’s superior visibility.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed camera specs are limited. Without information on sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization (OIS), a direct comparison is difficult. However, focusing on the main sensor is crucial; a larger sensor generally captures more light and detail. We can assume both phones will offer acceptable image quality for social media, but the Tecno Phantom V Flip’s chipset may provide an edge in image processing speed. The presence or absence of OIS would be a significant factor, but is currently unknown for either device. Ignoring the likely low-resolution macro cameras, the main camera performance will likely be the deciding factor for most users.
Performance
The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The Tecno Phantom V Flip packs a Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6nm), featuring a core configuration of 1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78, 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78, and 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This contrasts with the Motorola Razr 40’s Qualcomm SM7450-AB Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 (4nm). While the Snapdragon 7 Gen 1 benefits from a more efficient 4nm process, the Dimensity 8050’s higher clock speeds and more powerful core configuration suggest a performance advantage in CPU-intensive tasks. The 6nm process of the Dimensity 8050 may lead to slightly higher thermal output, but the performance gains are likely worth it for demanding users. Both phones likely utilize LPDDR5X RAM, but specific speeds are unknown.
Battery Life
Both the Tecno Phantom V Flip and Motorola Razr 40 achieve similar endurance ratings – 88 hours for the Tecno and 85 hours for the Motorola – suggesting comparable battery life in typical usage. However, the charging speeds differ significantly. The Tecno Phantom V Flip supports 45W wired charging, claiming a 50% charge in just 15 minutes. The Motorola Razr 40 is limited to 30W wired charging and 5W wireless charging. This faster charging capability gives the Tecno Phantom V Flip a clear advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Phantom V Flip if you need a phone that can handle demanding tasks like gaming and video editing, and if minimizing charging time is a priority. Its more powerful chipset and faster charging make it ideal for power users. Buy the Motorola Razr 40 if you prioritize a vibrant, easily viewable display, especially in bright sunlight, and prefer a more refined software experience, potentially benefiting from Motorola’s near-stock Android approach.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8050 in the Tecno Phantom V Flip get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the 6nm process isn't as efficient as the 4nm Snapdragon 7 Gen 1, the Dimensity 8050's performance advantage suggests it can handle gaming well. Thermal throttling is possible, but the phone likely incorporates cooling solutions to mitigate this. Real-world testing would be needed to determine the extent of throttling under sustained load.
❓ Is the 5W wireless charging on the Motorola Razr 40 practical for daily use?
5W wireless charging is quite slow and best suited for overnight or occasional top-ups. It's a convenient feature to have, but don't expect it to quickly replenish the battery. The 30W wired charging remains the primary method for efficient charging.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Tecno Phantom V Flip and the Motorola Razr 40?
Motorola is known for its near-stock Android experience with minimal bloatware, offering a cleaner and faster interface. Tecno's HiOS, while improving, typically includes more pre-installed apps and customizations. Users who prefer a streamlined experience may lean towards the Motorola Razr 40.
