The flip phone is back, but not as you remember it. Tecno and Honor are leading the charge with compelling foldable options, but they approach the market from different angles. The Tecno Phantom V Flip aims to deliver a premium experience at a more accessible price, while the Honor Magic V Flip 2 positions itself as a no-compromise flagship. This comparison breaks down the key differences to help you choose the right foldable for your lifestyle.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Honor Magic V Flip 2 is the superior device. Its significantly brighter display, vastly more powerful Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, and faster charging capabilities justify the higher price tag. However, the Tecno Phantom V Flip remains a strong contender for budget-conscious buyers prioritizing endurance.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, September 22 | 2025, August 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, October 01 | Available. Released 2025, August 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Eco leather back, aluminum frame, steel hinge | Aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | Unfolded: 171.7 x 74.1 x 7 mmFolded: 88.8 x 74.1 x 15 mm | Unfolded: 167.1 x 75.6 x 6.9 mm Folded: 86.2 x 75.6 x 15.5 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 194 g (6.84 oz) | 204 g (7.20 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2640 pixels (~413 ppi density) | 1232 x 2868 pixels, 21:9 ratio (~458 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.9 inches, 107.6 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.82 inches, 108.8 cm2 (~86.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | Foldable LTPO AMOLED, 120Hz, 1000 nits (peak) | Foldable LTPO OLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, 4320Hz PWM, HDR, Dolby Vision, BT.2020, 5000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13.5 | Android 15, MagicOS 9 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, PDAF
13 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm | 200 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.3", 0.6µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 120˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Features | LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K, 1080p, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm, AF | 50 MP, f/2.0, (wide), AF |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K, 1080p |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.1, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, ASHA |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), BDS (B1I+B1C+B2a+B2b), GALILEO (E1+E5a+E5b), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5), GLONASS |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity (incl. for accessories), compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), gyro, accelerometer, proximity (ultrasonic), compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 15 min | 80W wired, 100% in 42 min
50W wireless
5W reverse wired
Reverse wireless |
| Type | 4000 mAh | Si/C Li-Po 5500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iconic Black, Mystic Dawn | Purple, Silver, Gray, Blue |
| Models | AD11 | CLE-AN00 |
| Price | About 560 EUR | - |
Tecno Phantom V Flip
- Excellent battery endurance (88h rating)
- More affordable price point
- Potentially more durable hinge design (market perception)
- Significantly weaker processor (Dimensity 8050)
- Dimmer display (818 nits)
- Slower charging speeds (45W wired)
Honor Magic V Flip 2
- Flagship-level performance (Snapdragon 8 Gen 3)
- Incredibly bright display (1786 nits)
- Ultra-fast charging (80W wired, 50W wireless)
- Higher price tag
- Potentially shorter battery life in demanding use cases
- More complex foldable design may be less durable
Display Comparison
The Honor Magic V Flip 2 boasts a dramatically brighter display, reaching a measured 1786 nits compared to the Tecno Phantom V Flip’s 818 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in outdoor visibility. While both utilize foldable OLED panels, the Honor’s superior brightness and likely more advanced panel calibration contribute to a richer, more vibrant viewing experience. The Honor also benefits from a more recent generation panel, potentially offering improved color accuracy and efficiency. The Tecno's display, while adequate, will struggle in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera specs are limited, but the focus should be on image processing capabilities. While both phones offer photo and video recording, the Honor Magic V Flip 2 likely benefits from Qualcomm’s superior image signal processor (ISP) within the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3. This ISP enables better noise reduction, dynamic range, and overall image quality, particularly in low-light conditions. Without knowing sensor sizes, it’s difficult to make a definitive statement, but the Honor’s chipset advantage suggests a more refined camera experience. The Tecno's camera is likely competent, but won't match the Honor's processing prowess.
Performance
The performance gap is substantial. The Honor Magic V Flip 2’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4nm) is a generational leap ahead of the Tecno Phantom V Flip’s Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6nm). The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s Cortex-X4 prime core, clocked at 3.3 GHz, and more efficient 4nm process deliver significantly faster CPU and GPU performance. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and a far superior gaming experience. The Dimensity 8050 is capable, but will show its limitations in graphically intensive games and demanding applications. The Honor’s LPDDR5x RAM further enhances performance, while the Tecno’s RAM specification is not provided, but is likely slower.
Battery Life
The Tecno Phantom V Flip claims an impressive 88-hour endurance rating, while the Honor Magic V Flip 2 achieves 12:43 hours of active use. However, these metrics are measured differently. The Honor’s active use score provides a more realistic indication of real-world performance. The Honor also offers significantly faster charging: 80W wired (0-100% in 42 minutes), 50W wireless, and even reverse wireless charging. The Tecno’s 45W wired charging (50% in 15 minutes) is slower. Despite the Tecno’s potentially larger battery capacity (not specified), the Honor’s charging speed and more efficient chipset could result in comparable or even better overall usability.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Phantom V Flip if you need exceptional battery life and a more affordable entry point into the world of foldable phones. It’s ideal for users who prioritize talk time, social media browsing, and light gaming. Buy the Honor Magic V Flip 2 if you demand top-tier performance for demanding tasks like video editing, gaming, and multitasking, and if a stunning, incredibly bright display is a must-have. It caters to power users and those who want the best foldable experience available.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8050 in the Tecno Phantom V Flip struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, while the Dimensity 8050 is a capable chip, it will likely require significant graphics settings reductions to achieve playable frame rates in demanding titles like Genshin Impact. Expect noticeable frame drops and potential thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Honor Magic V Flip 2’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 will handle these games with ease at higher settings.
❓ How does the hinge durability compare between the Tecno Phantom V Flip and the Honor Magic V Flip 2?
Hinge durability is a key concern with foldable phones. While long-term testing is required for definitive answers, the Honor Magic V Flip 2 utilizes a more complex hinge design aimed at minimizing the crease and maximizing durability. Tecno has a reputation for robust build quality, but the Honor's design appears more advanced. Both manufacturers claim rigorous testing, but the Honor's hinge is likely more resistant to dust ingress.
❓ Is the 50W wireless charging on the Honor Magic V Flip 2 significantly faster than standard wireless charging?
Yes, 50W wireless charging is considerably faster than the typical 15-25W wireless charging found on many smartphones. It allows for a substantial battery top-up in a relatively short amount of time, making it a convenient option for users who prefer wireless charging. Expect a full charge from 0% to 100% in approximately 60-75 minutes with 50W wireless charging.
