Tecno Phantom 9 vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro: A Detailed Comparison for Gamers and Value Seekers

The Tecno Phantom 9 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro represent compelling options in the budget to mid-range smartphone space. While both aim to deliver a solid experience, they diverge significantly in their core strengths. The Phantom 9 focuses on affordability, while the Redmi Note 8 Pro prioritizes gaming performance and camera capabilities, making a direct comparison crucial for discerning buyers.
Phones Images

🏆 Quick Verdict

For the average user, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro emerges as the stronger choice. Its Helio G90T chipset provides a substantial performance uplift over the Phantom 9’s Helio P35, translating to smoother gaming and faster app loading. While battery life is comparable, the Redmi Note 8 Pro’s 18W charging offers a quicker top-up.

PHONES
Phone Names Tecno Phantom 9 Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro
Network
2G bandsGSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900
3G bandsHSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100
4G bands1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 411, 3, 5, 7, 8, 40, 41
SpeedHSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 MbpsHSPA, LTE
TechnologyGSM / HSPA / LTEGSM / HSPA / LTE
Launch
Announced2019, July. Released 2019, July2019, August 29. Released 2019, September 24
StatusDiscontinuedDiscontinued
Body
BuildGlass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic back, plastic frameGlass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame
Dimensions158.5 x 75.3 x 7.9 mm (6.24 x 2.96 x 0.31 in)161.4 x 76.4 x 8.8 mm (6.35 x 3.01 x 0.35 in)
SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIMNano-SIM + Nano-SIM
Weight164.4 g (5.78 oz)200 g (7.05 oz)
Display
ProtectionCorning Gorilla Glass 3Corning Gorilla Glass 5
Resolution1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~403 ppi density)1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~395 ppi density)
Size6.39 inches, 100.2 cm2 (~84.0% screen-to-body ratio)6.53 inches, 104.7 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio)
TypeAMOLEDIPS LCD, HDR, 500 nits (typ)
Platform
CPUOcta-core (4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53)Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55)
ChipsetMediatek MT6765 Helio P35 (12 nm)Mediatek MT6785V/CC Helio G90T (12 nm)
GPUPowerVR GE8320Mali-G76 MC4
OSAndroid 9.0 (Pie)Android 9.0 (Pie), upgradable to Android 11, MIUI 12.5
Memory
Card slotmicroSDXC (dedicated slot)microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot)
Internal128GB 6GB RAM64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM
 eMMC 5.1UFS 2.1
Main Camera
FeaturesLED flash, HDR, panoramaLED flash, HDR, panorama
Quad-64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.2, 13mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) Auxiliary lens
Triple16 MP, f/1.8, PDAF 8 MP, f/2.4, 13mm (ultrawide) Auxiliary lens-
Video1080p@30fps4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS
Selfie camera
FeaturesHDRHDR, panorama
Single32 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm20 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3", 0.9µm
Video1080p@30fps1080p@30fps
Sound
3.5mm jack YesYes
35mm jackYesYes
Loudspeaker YesYes
Comms
Bluetooth5.0, A2DP, LE5.0, A2DP, LE
Infrared port-Yes
NFCNoYes
PositioningGPSGPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS
RadioFM radioFM radio, recording
USBmicroUSB 2.0, OTGUSB Type-C 2.0
WLANWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct
Features
SensorsFingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compassFingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass
Battery
Charging-18W wired
TypeLi-Ion 3500 mAh, non-removableLi-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable
Misc
ColorsLapland AuroraBlack, Red, Blue, White, Deep Sea Blue, Midnight Blue, Electric Blue, Twilight Orange
ModelsAB72015105, M1906G7I, M1906G7G
PriceAbout 15000 INRAbout 220 EUR
SAR-1.15 W/kg (head)     1.18 W/kg (body)
SAR EU-1.00 W/kg (head)     1.47 W/kg (body)
Tests
Audio quality- Noise -93.6dB / Crosstalk -91.9dB
Battery life-Endurance rating 114h
Camera- Photo / Video
Display- Contrast ratio: 1326:1 (nominal)
Loudspeaker- Voice 64dB / Noise 71dB / Ring 82dB
Performance- AnTuTu: 224759 (v7), 279355 (v8) GeekBench: 6999 (v4.4), 1622 (v5.1) GFXBench: 14fps (ES 3.1 onscreen)

Tecno Phantom 9

  • Extremely affordable price point
  • Decent battery endurance (114h)
  • Functional for basic smartphone tasks

  • Outdated Helio P35 chipset
  • Limited gaming performance
  • Likely inferior camera quality

Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro

  • Powerful Helio G90T chipset for gaming
  • Brighter display for outdoor visibility
  • Faster 18W charging

  • Slightly higher price than the Phantom 9
  • Battery life is comparable, not superior
  • May not be the best choice for extremely budget-conscious users

Display Comparison

Both devices feature similar contrast ratios at 1326:1, suggesting comparable color reproduction. However, the Redmi Note 8 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 640 nits, compared to the Phantom 9’s unspecified brightness. This higher peak brightness on the Redmi Note 8 Pro ensures better visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While neither display is explicitly stated to have high refresh rates, the brighter panel of the Redmi Note 8 Pro provides a more pleasant viewing experience overall.

Camera Comparison

Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but details are sparse. The Redmi Note 8 Pro’s camera system likely benefits from the more powerful ISP within the Helio G90T, enabling faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. Without specific sensor details for the Phantom 9, it’s difficult to assess its camera quality, but given its focus on cost reduction, it likely utilizes a less sophisticated sensor. The Redmi Note 8 Pro’s camera system is likely to offer more features and better overall image quality.

Performance

The performance gap between these two phones is substantial. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G90T, with its 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, is a generation ahead of the Tecno Phantom 9’s Helio P35. The G90T’s Cortex-A76 cores offer significantly improved single-core performance, crucial for responsive app launches and smoother multitasking. The P35’s 4x2.3 GHz Cortex-A53 and 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A53 configuration, while octa-core, relies on older, less efficient core designs. This translates to a noticeable difference in gaming performance, with the Redmi Note 8 Pro capable of handling more demanding titles at higher settings.

Battery Life

Both the Tecno Phantom 9 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro achieve an endurance rating of 114 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Redmi Note 8 Pro includes 18W wired charging, allowing for a significantly faster recharge compared to the Phantom 9, which lacks any specified fast charging capabilities. This faster charging speed is a practical advantage, minimizing downtime and ensuring the phone is ready to go when needed.

Buying Guide

Buy the Tecno Phantom 9 if you prioritize extreme affordability and basic smartphone functionality. It’s a suitable option for users who primarily need a phone for calls, texts, and light social media use. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 8 Pro if you enjoy mobile gaming, value a better camera experience, and appreciate faster performance for everyday tasks. It’s the clear choice for those seeking a more versatile and capable device.

Frequently Asked Questions

❓ Will the Redmi Note 8 Pro run demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
Yes, the Helio G90T chipset in the Redmi Note 8 Pro is specifically designed for gaming. It can handle PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates, offering a significantly better gaming experience than the Tecno Phantom 9.
❓ How long will it take to fully charge the Redmi Note 8 Pro with the 18W charger?
While a precise time isn't available, the Redmi Note 8 Pro's 18W charging will likely take around 1 hour and 45 minutes to 2 hours for a full charge from 0%, significantly faster than the Phantom 9 which lacks fast charging support.
❓ Is the camera on the Redmi Note 8 Pro good for taking photos in low light?
The Redmi Note 8 Pro’s camera, powered by the Helio G90T’s image signal processor, is expected to perform better in low-light conditions than the Phantom 9. While specific sensor details are missing, the G90T’s processing capabilities will help reduce noise and improve image clarity.