The Tecno Megapad 11 and Motorola Moto Tab G70 represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive budget tablet space. Both aim to deliver a solid Android experience without breaking the bank, but they take different approaches to achieving this. The key differentiator lies in their chipsets – the Megapad 11 utilizes the newer, more efficient Mediatek Helio G99, while the Moto Tab G70 relies on the older Helio G90T. This comparison will dissect these differences and determine which tablet offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing sustained performance and efficiency, the Tecno Megapad 11 is the better choice. Its Mediatek Helio G99, built on a 6nm process, offers a noticeable advantage over the Moto Tab G70’s 12nm Helio G90T, translating to better thermal management and potentially longer gaming sessions. While the Moto Tab G70 offers slightly faster charging, the Megapad 11’s efficiency gives it an overall edge.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 4, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE Cat4 150/50 Mbps - cellular model only |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, December 02 | 2022, January 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, January 06 | Available. Released 2022, January 13 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, aluminum back, aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 257.1 x 168.7 x 7.6 mm (10.12 x 6.64 x 0.30 in) | 258.4 x 163 x 7.5 mm (10.17 x 6.42 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM (cellular model only) |
| Weight | 510 g (1.12 lb) | 500 g (1.10 lb) |
| | - | Water repellent design |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1200 x 1920 pixels, 16:10 ratio (~206 ppi density) | 1200 x 2000 pixels, 5:3 ratio (~212 ppi density) |
| Size | 11.0 inches, 350.9 cm2 (~80.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 11.0 inches, 344.4 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 440 nits | IPS LCD, 400 nits (typ) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek MT6785 Helio G90T (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14 | Android 11 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | eMMC 5.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | LED flash | LED flash |
| Single | 13 MP | 13 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), AF |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 8 MP | 8 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide) |
| Video | Yes | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) | Yes, with stereo speakers (4 speakers) |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | No |
| Positioning | Unspecified | GPS, GLONASS - cellular model only |
| Radio | Unspecified | No |
| USB | USB Type-C | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Accelerometer | Accelerometer, gyro, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 8000 mAh | Li-Po 7700 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Vitality Green, Starfall Grey | Modernist Teal, Blue |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 380 EUR |
Tecno Megapad 11
- More efficient Mediatek Helio G99 chipset
- Better thermal management for sustained performance
- Potentially longer battery life due to 6nm process
- Slower 18W charging compared to the Moto Tab G70
- Display specifications are unknown
Motorola Moto Tab G70
- Faster 20W wired charging
- Established brand reputation (Motorola)
- Potentially lower price point (depending on retailer)
- Less efficient Mediatek Helio G90T chipset
- Higher risk of thermal throttling under load
- Likely shorter battery life compared to the Megapad 11
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the price points, we can assume both utilize IPS LCD panels. The absence of details like resolution, peak brightness, or refresh rate suggests neither tablet is focused on display excellence. Users should expect a standard viewing experience suitable for everyday tasks and media consumption. Bezels are likely to be noticeable on both devices, typical for this market segment.
Camera Comparison
Without specific camera specifications, a detailed comparison is impossible. However, given the target market, it’s safe to assume both tablets feature modest camera setups primarily intended for video calls and casual snapshots. Expect a primary camera and potentially a secondary depth or macro sensor on both devices. Image quality will likely be adequate for basic use but shouldn’t be a primary purchasing factor.
Performance
The core of the difference lies in the chipsets. The Tecno Megapad 11’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Motorola Moto Tab G70’s Helio G90T (12nm). The 6nm process node allows for greater transistor density and improved power efficiency, meaning the G99 can deliver comparable or even better performance while consuming less power and generating less heat. Both CPUs feature the same core configuration – 2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – but the G99’s architecture benefits from the process node. This translates to less thermal throttling during prolonged gaming or demanding tasks. The G90T, while capable, will likely exhibit more performance degradation under sustained load.
Battery Life
The Moto Tab G70 boasts 20W wired charging, slightly faster than the Tecno Megapad 11’s 18W charging. This means the G70 will likely charge from 0-100% in a shorter timeframe. However, the Helio G99’s superior power efficiency in the Megapad 11 could offset the slower charging speed. The Megapad 11 is likely to offer longer battery life during typical usage, even with a potentially smaller battery capacity (spec not provided). The G90T’s less efficient architecture will consume more power, requiring more frequent charging.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Megapad 11 if you need a tablet for extended gaming sessions, multitasking, or demanding applications where sustained performance and thermal efficiency are crucial. The Helio G99’s 6nm process provides a clear advantage. Buy the Motorola Moto Tab G70 if you prioritize faster charging speeds and are primarily using the tablet for media consumption and light tasks. The 20W charging is a benefit for quick top-ups, but the older chipset will likely throttle under heavy load.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Tecno Megapad 11 handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Mediatek Helio G99 in the Tecno Megapad 11 is well-suited for PUBG Mobile. The 6nm process and capable CPU/GPU combination should deliver playable frame rates at medium to high settings. However, sustained performance will be better than peak performance due to thermal constraints, so expect some frame drops during extended gaming sessions. The Moto Tab G70’s G90T will likely struggle to maintain consistent frame rates for extended periods.
❓ How much faster is the charging on the Motorola Moto Tab G70 compared to the Tecno Megapad 11?
The Moto Tab G70’s 20W charging is approximately 11% faster than the Tecno Megapad 11’s 18W charging. While this difference is noticeable, the Megapad 11’s more efficient chipset means you may not need to charge it as frequently, mitigating the slower charging speed. Expect roughly a 30-60 minute difference in a full charge, depending on battery capacity (which is not specified).
❓ Is the Mediatek Helio G99 a significant upgrade over the Helio G90T for multitasking?
Yes, the Helio G99 offers a noticeable improvement in multitasking performance. The 6nm process allows for better power management and sustained clock speeds, resulting in smoother app switching and reduced lag when running multiple applications simultaneously. The G90T, while capable, will likely exhibit more slowdowns when heavily loaded.
