The Tecno Camon 40 Pro and Realme 11 Pro+ both target the competitive mid-range market, leveraging Mediatek’s Dimensity series. However, they take different approaches: Tecno prioritizes sustained performance and display brightness, while Realme focuses on blazing-fast charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which phone delivers the best overall experience.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a brighter, more visible display, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro emerges as the winner. Its 13:51h active use score and 1045 nits peak brightness significantly outperform the Realme 11 Pro+, despite the latter’s faster 100W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41 - India |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1x |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, May 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, leather or plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.6 x 7.3 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 161.6 x 73.9 x 8.2 mm or 8.7 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 183 g or 189 g (6.46 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2412 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~394 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.7 inches, 108.0 cm2 (~90.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, HDR10+, 120Hz, 950 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7050 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Realme UI 5.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 1TB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 112˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.5, 22mm (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | - | No |
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 23 min, 100% in 43 min | 100W wired |
| Type | 5200 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White | Astral Black, Sunrise Beige, Oasis Green |
| Models | CM7 | RMX3740, RMX3741 |
| Price | - | € 399.90 / ₹ 27,990 |
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor use
- Longer battery life with active use
- More efficient 4nm Dimensity 7300 chipset
- Slower charging speed compared to Realme
- Camera details are currently unknown
Realme 11 Pro+
- Ultra-fast 100W wired charging
- Potentially higher single-core CPU performance
- Likely strong camera marketing and features
- Dimmer display impacting outdoor visibility
- Less efficient 6nm Dimensity 7050 chipset
- Shorter battery life based on available data
Display Comparison
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 1045 nits compared to the Realme 11 Pro+'s 793 nits. This translates to superior readability under direct sunlight. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Tecno’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. We lack data on refresh rates or panel technology (LTPO), but the brightness difference alone makes the Tecno more usable in bright environments. The Realme’s lower brightness may necessitate higher brightness settings, impacting battery life.
Camera Comparison
Context data is limited regarding camera capabilities beyond the mention of 'Photo / Video' for the Realme 11 Pro+. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. We can assume the Realme 11 Pro+ may emphasize camera features in its marketing, but the Tecno’s chipset could offer superior image signal processing (ISP) capabilities due to its newer architecture. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device would be a significant advantage for low-light photography and video recording, but this is unknown.
Performance
Both phones are powered by Mediatek Dimensity chips, but the Tecno Camon 40 Pro’s Dimensity 7300 (4nm) holds a technical edge over the Realme 11 Pro+'s Dimensity 7050 (6nm). The smaller 4nm process node generally leads to improved power efficiency and thermal management, potentially reducing throttling during extended gaming sessions. The CPU configuration is similar – both feature Cortex-A78 cores – but the Tecno has a slightly different core count (4x2.5GHz vs 2x2.6GHz). The Realme’s higher clock speed on its prime cores *might* offer a marginal boost in single-core tasks, but the 4nm process of the Tecno should provide better sustained performance. RAM speed and type are unknown, but are critical for overall responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 40 Pro demonstrates superior battery endurance with a 13:51h active use score, while the Realme 11 Pro+ only provides an 'Endurance rating' of 112h, a metric that doesn’t directly translate to real-world usage. The Realme compensates with its 100W wired charging, achieving 100% charge in a claimed 43 minutes, compared to the Tecno’s 45W charging (50% in 23 min, 100% in 43 min). While the Realme charges faster, the Tecno’s longer battery life means you’ll need to charge it less frequently. The 4nm process of the Dimensity 7300 likely contributes to the Tecno’s improved battery performance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 40 Pro if you need a phone that lasts all day with heavy use and offers excellent outdoor visibility. It’s ideal for content creators and users who value a consistently smooth experience. Buy the Realme 11 Pro+ if you absolutely prioritize the fastest possible charging speeds and are willing to trade some battery endurance and display brightness for it. It’s a good fit for users who frequently find themselves needing a quick power boost.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7050 in the Realme 11 Pro+ get noticeably hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The 6nm process of the Dimensity 7050, while capable, is less thermally efficient than the 4nm Dimensity 7300 in the Tecno Camon 40 Pro. This suggests the Realme 11 Pro+ may experience more throttling and heat buildup during extended gaming, potentially impacting performance over time.
❓ How much of a difference will the 100W charging make in daily use on the Realme 11 Pro+?
While 100W charging is incredibly fast, its benefit is most noticeable when you *need* a quick top-up. If you typically charge overnight, the speed advantage is less impactful. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro’s longer battery life may reduce the frequency of charging, minimizing the need for ultra-fast charging in the first place.
❓ Is the difference in display brightness between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 252 nit difference (1045 vs 793) is significant. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro’s brighter display will be much easier to see in direct sunlight or brightly lit environments, offering a more comfortable viewing experience.
