The Tecno Camon 40 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both leverage MediaTek’s Dimensity series, they diverge in execution, particularly regarding battery performance and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences, helping you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing all-day battery life and rapid charging, the Tecno Camon 40 Pro is the stronger choice. Its significantly longer active use battery score (13:51h vs 10:28h) and efficient 45W charging outweigh the Edge 40 Neo’s faster peak charging speed.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.3 x 74.6 x 7.3 mm (6.47 x 2.94 x 0.29 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 179 g (6.31 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 7300 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G615 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm, AF | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired, 50% in 23 min, 100% in 43 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5200 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black, Glacier White | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | CM7 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | - | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Tecno Camon 40 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (13:51h active use)
- Efficient Dimensity 7300 (4nm) chipset
- Competitive 45W fast charging
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
- Camera specs require further investigation
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster peak charging speed (68W)
- Slightly brighter display (1073 nits)
- Potentially faster software updates
- Significantly shorter battery life (10:28h active use)
- Less efficient Dimensity 7030 (6nm) chipset
Display Comparison
Both the Tecno Camon 40 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo boast impressive displays, achieving peak brightness levels of 1045 nits and 1073 nits respectively. While the Edge 40 Neo marginally exceeds the Camon 40 Pro in peak brightness, the difference is unlikely to be noticeable in most real-world scenarios. Neither specification details refresh rate or panel technology (OLED/LCD), but given the market segment, OLED is highly probable for both. Bezels and color accuracy would require hands-on testing, but the brightness figures suggest strong outdoor visibility for both devices.
Camera Comparison
The provided data doesn’t offer sufficient detail for a comprehensive camera comparison. Both phones likely feature multi-camera systems, but the absence of sensor size, aperture, or OIS information limits analysis. The presence of a 'Photo / Video' designation for the Edge 40 Neo suggests a focus on multimedia capabilities, but without specifics, it’s difficult to assess its advantage. We can assume both will include standard wide, ultrawide, and potentially macro lenses, but the quality will depend heavily on the primary sensor and image processing algorithms.
Performance
The core of the performance difference lies in the chipsets. The Tecno Camon 40 Pro utilizes the MediaTek Dimensity 7300 (4nm), while the Motorola Edge 40 Neo features the Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 4nm process node of the 7300 offers superior power efficiency, contributing to the Camon 40 Pro’s longer battery life. CPU architecture also plays a role; the Camon 40 Pro has 4x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores alongside 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. This suggests a slight edge in multi-core performance for the Camon 40 Pro. The Edge 40 Neo’s 6nm process may offer a small advantage in sustained performance under heavy load, but the Camon 40 Pro’s efficiency is more impactful for daily use.
Battery Life
Battery life is a clear win for the Tecno Camon 40 Pro, achieving an active use score of 13:51h compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h. This nearly 3-hour difference is significant for users who demand all-day endurance. While the Edge 40 Neo boasts 68W wired charging, reaching 50% in 15 minutes, the Camon 40 Pro’s 45W charging still manages 50% in 23 minutes and 100% in 43 minutes. The faster peak wattage of the Edge 40 Neo is offset by the Camon 40 Pro’s larger battery efficiency, resulting in a more practical charging experience for sustained use.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 40 Pro if you need exceptional battery endurance for heavy daily use, including streaming, gaming, and extensive camera work. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prioritize a sleeker design, potentially faster software updates (based on Motorola’s track record), and are comfortable with a shorter battery life and a reliance on topping up more frequently.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo tend to throttle under sustained gaming loads?
The 6nm process of the Dimensity 7030 is generally efficient, but without specific thermal design details for the Edge 40 Neo, it's difficult to say definitively. However, the 4nm Dimensity 7300 in the Camon 40 Pro is likely to exhibit less throttling due to its superior thermal efficiency, potentially offering a smoother gaming experience over extended periods.
❓ How does the 45W charging on the Tecno Camon 40 Pro compare to the 68W on the Edge 40 Neo in real-world usage?
While the Edge 40 Neo charges faster initially (50% in 15 minutes), the Camon 40 Pro’s 45W charging is still quite rapid (50% in 23 minutes, 100% in 43 minutes). The Camon 40 Pro’s larger battery capacity and more efficient chipset mean you’re less likely to need to top up as frequently, making the slightly slower charging speed less of a concern.
❓ Is the Motorola Edge 40 Neo likely to receive more timely Android updates compared to the Tecno Camon 40 Pro?
Historically, Motorola has a better track record for providing relatively quick Android updates compared to Tecno. However, this can vary, and Tecno has been improving its software support in recent years. If timely updates are a high priority, the Edge 40 Neo is likely the safer bet, but it's not a guarantee.
