Tecno Camon 40 Premier vs Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing display quality and rapid charging, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. However, those seeking sustained performance and slightly longer battery life will find the Tecno Camon 40 Premier a compelling alternative, offering a strong CPU configuration.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Camon 40 Premier | Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 161 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (7.41 oz) | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 15 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (15cm - ∞), 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS 8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm 2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@30fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 70W wired | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | CM8 | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | - | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Longer battery life in active use
- Potentially better multi-core performance due to CPU configuration
- Competitive pricing (assumed based on Tecno's market position)
- Significantly lower peak display brightness
- Slower charging speed compared to the Redmi
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Exceptional peak display brightness for outdoor visibility
- Blazing-fast 120W charging with PD3.0 support
- Potentially more refined camera image processing
- Shorter battery life in active use
- Slightly less powerful CPU configuration for demanding tasks
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ immediately stands out with its 1283 nits of peak brightness, a substantial leap over the Tecno Camon 40 Premier’s 658 nits. This difference translates to significantly better visibility under direct sunlight. While both utilize 4nm chipsets, the display power draw will impact overall efficiency. We lack panel technology details (LTPO, AMOLED) but the brightness difference is a key differentiator. The Redmi’s display is demonstrably superior for outdoor use and HDR content consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset’s ISP capabilities are relevant. Both Dimensity chips support advanced image processing features. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s marketing often emphasizes camera capabilities, suggesting a potentially more refined image processing pipeline. The absence of information regarding sensor sizes and OIS makes it difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Redmi’s brand positioning suggests a stronger focus on camera performance.
Performance
Both phones leverage MediaTek’s Dimensity series, but with different approaches. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier features the Dimensity 8350, employing a tri-cluster configuration with three Cortex-A715 cores clocked at 3.20 GHz alongside a single, faster Cortex-A715 at 3.35 GHz. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+ utilizes the Dimensity 7200 Ultra, with a dual-cluster setup of two Cortex-A715 cores at 2.8 GHz. While the Redmi has fewer high-performance cores, the Dimensity 7200 Ultra is optimized for efficiency. The Camon 40 Premier’s CPU configuration suggests a slight edge in multi-threaded tasks, but real-world performance will depend on thermal management and software optimization.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier achieves an active use battery score of 11:36h, outperforming the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s 10:38h. However, the Redmi compensates with its 120W wired charging, capable of a full charge in just 19 minutes. The Camon 40 Premier’s 70W charging is respectable, but significantly slower. This trade-off is crucial: the Redmi prioritizes convenience and quick top-ups, while the Tecno favors longer runtimes between charges. The 4nm process node on both chips contributes to improved power efficiency, but the Redmi’s faster charging mitigates the slightly smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 40 Premier if you need a phone that can handle demanding applications and extended gaming sessions without significant throttling, and if you value a balance between performance and battery endurance. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prioritize a vibrant, exceptionally bright display for outdoor visibility, and if minimizing charging time is a top concern, making it ideal for users constantly on the go.