The Tecno Camon 40 Premier and vivo V29e represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take drastically different approaches to processing power and efficiency. The Camon 40 Premier boasts a high-end Mediatek Dimensity 8350, while the V29e relies on the more modest Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G. This comparison will dissect these key differences and determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 8350 chipset offers significantly more processing power than the Snapdragon 695 in the V29e. However, the V29e’s efficiency and potentially lower price point make it a viable option for everyday users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, October 23 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, October 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 161 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 162.4 x 74.9 x 7.7 mm (6.39 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (7.41 oz) | 190 g (6.70 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | - |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM) | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1150 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 15 | Android 13, Funtouch 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, (ultrawide) |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (15cm - ∞), 3x optical zoom
50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/2.0, 22mm (wide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired | 44W wired |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5100 mAh | Li-Ion 4800 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black | Forest Black, Rose Gold, Ice Creek Blue |
| Models | CM8 | V2317 |
| Price | - | About 320 EUR |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Significantly more powerful processor for gaming and multitasking
- Faster 70W wired charging for quick top-ups
- Potentially better image processing due to the Dimensity 8350's ISP
- Potentially higher price point
- May run hotter under sustained load (though 4nm helps)
vivo V29e
- More power-efficient chipset for potentially longer battery life
- Likely more affordable price
- Sufficient performance for everyday tasks
- Significantly weaker performance for demanding applications
- Slower 44W charging
Display Comparison
The provided data only details display brightness, with the Tecno Camon 40 Premier reaching 658 nits. While this is a respectable peak brightness, it doesn't tell the full story. We can infer that both devices likely utilize AMOLED panels, common in this price bracket, but without further data on color accuracy, refresh rates, or PWM dimming, a definitive comparison is difficult. The higher brightness of the Camon 40 Premier will provide better visibility in direct sunlight, but the V29e may offer a more color-accurate or flicker-free experience depending on its panel characteristics.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the main sensor, a thorough comparison is limited. However, the chipset plays a crucial role in image processing. The Dimensity 8350’s superior ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Camon 40 Premier will likely result in better dynamic range, noise reduction, and overall image quality, especially in challenging lighting conditions. While the V29e may produce acceptable photos in good light, it will likely fall behind in low-light scenarios. The absence of OIS information for either device makes it difficult to assess video stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier’s Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4nm) is a significantly more powerful chipset than the vivo V29e’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Dimensity 8350 features a tri-cluster configuration with high-performance Cortex-A715 cores, while the Snapdragon 695 relies on Kryo 660 Gold cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 8350 also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially leading to sustained performance during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 695 is adequate for everyday tasks, but will struggle with graphically intensive applications. The Dimensity 8350 will benefit users who engage in mobile gaming or content creation.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier achieves an active use score of 11:36h, a strong result. While the V29e’s battery capacity is unknown, its Snapdragon 695 chipset is more power-efficient. However, the Camon 40 Premier compensates with significantly faster 70W wired charging compared to the V29e’s 44W charging. This means the Camon 40 Premier can replenish its battery much quicker, mitigating any potential battery life disadvantage. A full charge on the Camon 40 Premier will be significantly faster, appealing to users who prioritize convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 40 Premier if you need a phone capable of handling demanding games, video editing, or multitasking without slowdowns. Its superior chipset and faster charging will appeal to power users. Buy the vivo V29e if you prioritize a smooth, reliable experience for everyday tasks like browsing, social media, and light gaming, and are looking for a potentially more affordable option with decent battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Snapdragon 695 in the vivo V29e struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
Yes, the Snapdragon 695 is not designed for demanding games like Genshin Impact. While you might be able to run it on low settings, expect significant frame drops and a less-than-ideal gaming experience. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier’s Dimensity 8350 is far better suited for such titles.
❓ How much faster is the 70W charging on the Tecno Camon 40 Premier compared to the 44W charging on the vivo V29e?
While exact times depend on battery capacity, 70W charging will significantly reduce charging times. Expect the Camon 40 Premier to go from 0-100% in approximately 45-60 minutes, while the V29e will likely take over 75-90 minutes. This difference is substantial for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the Dimensity 8350 in the Tecno Camon 40 Premier generate excessive heat during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8350 is a powerful chip, and will generate heat under load. However, the 4nm manufacturing process helps to mitigate this. While some throttling is possible, it's likely to be less severe than with older, less efficient chipsets. The Camon 40 Premier's thermal management system will play a key role in maintaining stable performance.
