The Tecno Camon 40 Premier and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 40 Premier aims for raw performance with its Dimensity 8350, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes a sleek design and balanced feature set with the Dimensity 7030. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing peak performance and extended gaming sessions, the Tecno Camon 40 Premier emerges as the winner. Its Dimensity 8350 chipset and longer active use battery life (11:36h) outweigh the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s brighter display. However, the Edge 40 Neo remains a strong contender for those valuing a more refined aesthetic and faster charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2025, March 03 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2025, May | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 7i), plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 161 x 75 x 7.7 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 193 g (7.41 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 7i | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1260 x 2800 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~460 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, 2160Hz PWM, HDR, 1600 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715 & 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715 & 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali G615-MC6 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 15, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HIOS 15 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF (15cm - ∞), 3x optical zoom
50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | Si/C Li-Ion 5100 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Emerald Lake Green, Galaxy Black | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | CM8 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | - | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Tecno Camon 40 Premier
- Superior processing power with Dimensity 8350
- Longer active use battery life
- Faster charging (70W)
- Lower peak display brightness
- Potentially less refined design
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Significantly brighter display for outdoor use
- Faster charging speed (50% in 15 min)
- Sleek and modern design
- Less powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
- Shorter active use battery life
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a considerably brighter display, reaching 1073 nits compared to the Tecno Camon 40 Premier’s 658 nits. This difference is immediately noticeable in direct sunlight, making the Edge 40 Neo more usable outdoors. While both likely employ OLED panels, the Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness is a clear advantage. We lack information on refresh rates or panel technology (LTPO) for either device, but the brightness gap is a significant differentiator. The Camon 40 Premier’s lower brightness may be less fatiguing indoors, but the Edge 40 Neo offers superior visibility in bright conditions.
Camera Comparison
Context data is limited regarding camera capabilities beyond the mention of 'Photo / Video' for the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. However, the absence of specific sensor details suggests a more conventional camera setup. The Tecno Camon 40 Premier, while lacking detailed specs here, often focuses on high-resolution sensors in its Premier line. Without knowing the main sensor size or aperture for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. We can assume the Edge 40 Neo will likely offer a more polished, software-driven image processing experience, typical of Motorola, while Tecno often emphasizes hardware specifications.
Performance
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier’s Mediatek Dimensity 8350 (4nm) represents a substantial leap in processing power over the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 8350 features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 1x3.35 GHz Cortex-A715, 3x3.20 GHz Cortex-A715, and 4x2.20 GHz Cortex-A510 – compared to the Edge 40 Neo’s 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55. The smaller 4nm process node of the 8350 also translates to improved thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Camon 40 Premier is better equipped for demanding games and applications. The Edge 40 Neo’s chipset is still capable, but it’s a step down in terms of raw performance.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 40 Premier delivers a longer active use battery life of 11:36h, exceeding the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28h. While the Edge 40 Neo boasts 68W wired charging with a 50% charge in 15 minutes, the Camon 40 Premier’s 70W charging is also very competitive. The Edge 40 Neo’s older 'Endurance rating' of 80h is less useful than the real-world active use score. The Camon 40 Premier’s superior battery life provides more headroom for power users, while the Edge 40 Neo’s faster charging offers quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 40 Premier if you need uncompromising processing power for demanding apps, gaming, or content creation, and value longer battery life during intensive use. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more visually striking design, a significantly brighter display for outdoor visibility, and faster charging speeds, even if it means slightly less raw performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8350 in the Tecno Camon 40 Premier get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8350’s 4nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency compared to the 6nm Dimensity 7030 in the Edge 40 Neo. While some heat generation is inevitable during gaming, the Camon 40 Premier is likely to experience less throttling and maintain higher frame rates for longer periods.
❓ How does the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo compare to the 70W charging on the Tecno Camon 40 Premier in real-world use?
While the Edge 40 Neo claims 50% charge in 15 minutes, the difference between 68W and 70W is marginal. Both phones will provide a substantial charge in a short amount of time. The Edge 40 Neo’s faster initial charge may be slightly quicker, but the Camon 40 Premier’s larger battery capacity means it will take longer to fully charge regardless.
❓ Is the difference in display brightness between the two phones noticeable in everyday use?
Yes, the 415-nit difference in peak brightness is significant. Users who frequently use their phones outdoors in bright sunlight will find the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s display much more readable. Indoors, the difference is less pronounced, but the Edge 40 Neo still offers a more vibrant viewing experience.
