The Tecno Camon 30S and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 30S aims to deliver solid performance at an aggressive price point, while the Edge 40 Neo focuses on a more balanced experience with a premium design and faster charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you choose the right device.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and rapid charging, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo emerges as the winner. Its significantly faster 68W charging and impressive 10:28h active use battery score outweigh the Camon 30S’s lower price, offering a more convenient and reliable daily experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, October 10 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, October 10 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 74.6 x 7.6 mm (6.48 x 2.94 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.5% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 1300 nits (HBM) | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G100 (6 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 13 MP | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 0-100% in 45 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Nebula Violet, Blue, Celestial Black, Dawn Gold | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | CLA5 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Tecno Camon 30S
- More affordable price point
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Functional and reliable
- Slower charging speed
- Likely lower display brightness
- Less powerful processor
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Faster 68W charging
- Longer battery life (10:28h active use)
- More powerful Dimensity 7030 processor
- Higher price tag
- May not be significantly better in everyday tasks for casual users
- No expandable storage (likely)
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits, which translates to better visibility outdoors. While the Camon 30S’s display specifications are not provided, it’s likely to be lower. The Edge 40 Neo’s higher brightness is a significant advantage for users who frequently consume content in bright environments. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to conserve power, but the brighter panel on the Motorola will be more impactful in real-world usage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications for the Tecno Camon 30S, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera system likely benefits from MediaTek’s APU for image processing, potentially offering better dynamic range and noise reduction. The Edge 40 Neo’s focus on both photo and video suggests a more versatile camera experience. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on budget phones often yields underwhelming results, and without knowing the Camon 30S’s main sensor size or aperture, it’s difficult to assess its photographic capabilities. The Edge 40 Neo’s camera is likely to be more consistent and reliable across various shooting conditions.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030, with its 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, offers a clear performance advantage over the Tecno Camon 30S’s Helio G100 (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76). The Cortex-A78 architecture is a generation ahead of the A76, resulting in improved single-core and multi-core performance. This difference will be noticeable in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. Both chips are fabricated on a 6nm process, but the Dimensity 7030’s superior core design and potentially more efficient GPU will provide a smoother and more responsive user experience. The Edge 40 Neo is better suited for users who engage in more intensive mobile activities.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 68W wired charging is a significant advantage, capable of reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes. This is substantially faster than the Tecno Camon 30S’s 33W charging, which takes 45 minutes for a full charge. While the Camon 30S’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the Edge 40 Neo’s endurance rating of 80 hours and 10:28h active use score demonstrate superior battery life. The faster charging speed of the Edge 40 Neo mitigates any potential concerns about battery drain, making it a more convenient option for users on the go.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 30S if you need a functional smartphone with decent performance for everyday tasks and prioritize affordability above all else. You’ll be making compromises on charging speed and long-term performance. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more refined experience with faster charging, longer battery life, and a more capable processor for demanding applications and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7030 is a relatively efficient chip, and Motorola typically employs effective thermal management solutions. While some heat generation is inevitable during prolonged gaming, the Edge 40 Neo is unlikely to experience significant throttling, providing a consistently smooth gaming experience. The 6nm process node contributes to better thermal efficiency compared to older chipsets.
❓ How does the 33W charging on the Tecno Camon 30S compare to typical fast charging standards?
33W charging is considered a moderate fast charging speed. While it's faster than standard 15W or 18W charging, it's significantly slower than the 68W charging offered by the Motorola Edge 40 Neo. Expect a full charge to take around 45 minutes, which may be inconvenient for users who need a quick top-up.
❓ Is the difference in CPU architecture (Cortex-A78 vs Cortex-A76) noticeable in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing and social media, the difference between the Cortex-A78 and Cortex-A76 cores will be minimal. However, the A78’s superior performance will become more apparent when multitasking, opening demanding apps, or performing more complex operations. The Edge 40 Neo will feel snappier and more responsive overall.
