The Tecno Camon 30 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 30 focuses on delivering a solid experience at a potentially lower price point, while the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ aims for a more premium feel with faster charging and a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and convenience, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset offers a significant performance uplift over the Camon 30’s Helio G99 Ultimate, and the 120W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, the Tecno Camon 30 remains a viable option for budget-conscious users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA- International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 27 | 2023, September 21 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 02 | Available. Released 2023, September 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 75.3 x 7.7 mm (6.51 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 161.4 x 74.2 x 8.9 mm (6.35 x 2.92 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 199 g or 204.5 g (7.02 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1220 x 2712 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~446 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, 120Hz, 1920Hz PWM, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 1800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC4 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 | Android 13, up to 3 major Android upgrades, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB, 256GB 12GB | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 8GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | - | 200 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.4", 0.56µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@24/30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), AF | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide) |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 0-100% in 45 min | 120W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 19 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown | Midnight Black (Fushion Black), Moonlight White (Fushion White), Aurora Purple, Fushion Purple, Camo Green |
| Models | CL6, CL6k | 23090RA98C, 23090RA98G, 23090RA98I |
| Price | - | $ 299.98 / £ 299.00 / € 208.98 / ₹ 24,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 0.85 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.98 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
Tecno Camon 30
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- 70W fast charging is still respectable
- Helio G99 Ultimate chipset is less powerful than Dimensity 7200 Ultra
- Likely lower display brightness
- Less advanced camera system
Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+
- Powerful Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra chipset
- 120W ultra-fast charging
- Bright and vibrant display (1283 nits)
- Higher price tag
- May be overkill for basic users
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak of 1283 nits. This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight compared to the Tecno Camon 30, whose brightness is not specified but is likely lower given its positioning. While both likely utilize AMOLED panels, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s higher brightness and potential for higher resolution (based on typical Redmi Pro+ specs) contribute to a more immersive viewing experience. The absence of LTPO technology in either device suggests both will rely on adaptive refresh rates to balance smoothness and power consumption.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs for the Tecno Camon 30, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to feature a more sophisticated camera system, potentially including a larger main sensor and more advanced image processing algorithms. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s focus on image quality is evident in its typical sensor size and OIS implementation. While the Camon 30 may offer a respectable camera experience for its price point, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is likely to deliver superior image quality, especially in low-light conditions. We can safely assume the 2MP macro cameras on both devices will offer limited utility.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 7200 Ultra (4nm) is a substantial upgrade over the Tecno Camon 30’s Helio G99 Ultimate. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s Cortex-A715 cores, clocked at 2.8 GHz, offer a significant performance advantage over the Camon 30’s 2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The 4nm process node of the Dimensity 7200 Ultra also contributes to improved thermal efficiency, meaning less throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. While both phones feature 8GB of RAM (assumed based on market segment), the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is likely to benefit from faster LPDDR5x RAM, further enhancing its responsiveness.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 13 Pro+’s 120W charging is a game-changer, achieving a full charge in just 19 minutes. This is significantly faster than the Tecno Camon 30’s 70W charging, which takes 45 minutes to reach 100%. While the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ has an active use score of 10:38h, the faster charging mitigates any potential concerns about battery life. The Camon 30’s battery capacity is not specified, but the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s combination of efficient chipset and rapid charging provides a more convenient user experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 if you need a reliable smartphone for everyday tasks and prioritize value for money. It’s a good choice for users who don’t heavily game or require the fastest possible charging. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 13 Pro+ if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, especially for gaming and multitasking, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 120W charging. It’s ideal for power users and those who frequently find themselves needing to top up their battery quickly.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7200 Ultra’s 4nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ is expected to manage temperatures effectively, minimizing throttling and maintaining consistent performance for extended periods. However, sustained high-intensity tasks will still generate heat.
❓ Is the 70W charging on the Tecno Camon 30 fast enough for most users?
70W charging is still considered fast and will provide a significant top-up in a relatively short amount of time. However, compared to the Redmi Note 13 Pro+'s 120W charging, it takes considerably longer to fully charge the device (45 minutes vs. 19 minutes). For users who frequently need to quickly replenish their battery, the 120W charging is a substantial advantage.
❓ How does the Helio G99 Ultimate handle graphically demanding games?
The Helio G99 Ultimate is capable of running many popular games, but it will likely require lower graphics settings to maintain a smooth frame rate in more demanding titles. The Dimensity 7200 Ultra in the Redmi Note 13 Pro+ offers a significantly more powerful GPU, allowing for higher graphics settings and smoother gameplay.
