The Tecno Camon 30 and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 30 focuses on delivering a strong gaming experience at an accessible price point, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes all-day battery life and a refined user experience. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and a more polished experience, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo is the better choice. Its Dimensity 7030 chipset offers a balance of performance and efficiency, coupled with a significantly longer battery life of 10:28h of active use. The Tecno Camon 30 is a viable option for budget-conscious gamers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 27 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 02 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 165.3 x 75.3 x 7.7 mm (6.51 x 2.96 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~88.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 Ultimate | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB, 256GB 12GB | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | 50 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.57", PDAF, OIS
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED dual-tone | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, (wide), AF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 0-100% in 45 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Uyuni Salt White, Sahara Sand Brown | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | CL6, CL6k | XT2307-1 |
| Price | - | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Tecno Camon 30
- Faster charging speed (70W)
- Potentially lower price point
- Helio G99 Ultimate offers decent gaming performance for the price
- Limited battery life information
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G99)
- Display brightness likely lower than Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Excellent battery life (10:28h active use)
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- More efficient chipset (Dimensity 7030)
- Slightly slower charging speed (68W)
- Potentially higher price point
- Gaming performance, while good, may not match dedicated gaming phones
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured peak brightness of 1073 nits. This is crucial for outdoor visibility, a clear advantage over the Tecno Camon 30 (brightness data unavailable). While the Camon 30’s panel specifications are unknown, the Edge 40 Neo’s brightness suggests a superior viewing experience in bright conditions. The Edge 40 Neo’s panel likely benefits from its more modern chipset’s display capabilities, potentially offering better color accuracy and contrast.
Camera Comparison
Camera details for the Tecno Camon 30 are limited, making a direct comparison challenging. However, the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s camera system, while not specified in detail, benefits from the Dimensity 7030’s advanced image signal processor (ISP). This ISP enables features like improved noise reduction and dynamic range. Without knowing the sensor size or aperture of the Camon 30’s main camera, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance. The Edge 40 Neo’s ISP is likely to deliver more consistent and higher-quality images across various lighting conditions. We'll assume the Edge 40 Neo has OIS, a common feature in this price range, which the Camon 30 may lack.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6nm) represents a step up in processing power and efficiency compared to the Tecno Camon 30’s Helio G99 Ultimate. The Dimensity 7030 utilizes Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, offering a performance advantage over the Camon 30’s Cortex-A76 cores at 2.2 GHz. The 6nm fabrication process of the Dimensity 7030 also contributes to better thermal management and power efficiency, meaning sustained performance during demanding tasks. While the Camon 30 is capable for everyday tasks, the Edge 40 Neo will handle multitasking and graphically intensive games more smoothly.
Battery Life
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo clearly wins in battery endurance. Its active use score of 10:28h and endurance rating of 80h significantly outperform the Tecno Camon 30 (battery life data unavailable). While the Camon 30 offers 70W wired charging, achieving 0-100% in 45 minutes, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W charging still manages 50% in just 15 minutes. The Edge 40 Neo’s superior efficiency, thanks to the Dimensity 7030’s 6nm process, allows it to extract more usage from its battery, making it the ideal choice for users who prioritize all-day battery life.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 if you need a phone primarily for mobile gaming and value raw processing power within a tight budget. Its Helio G99 Ultimate chipset offers respectable performance for the price. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a phone that can comfortably last a full day on a single charge, offers a brighter display, and provides a more refined software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Dimensity 7030 in the Motorola Edge 40 Neo get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 7030’s 6nm fabrication process and efficient design contribute to better thermal management compared to the Helio G99 Ultimate. While some heat generation is inevitable during extended gaming, the Edge 40 Neo is less likely to experience significant throttling, maintaining consistent performance for longer periods.
❓ Is the 70W charging on the Tecno Camon 30 significantly faster in real-world use than the 68W on the Motorola Edge 40 Neo?
While the Tecno Camon 30 boasts 70W charging, the Edge 40 Neo’s 68W still charges quickly, reaching 50% in just 15 minutes. The difference in 0-100% charge time (45 minutes vs. unknown for the Edge 40 Neo) is noticeable, but the Edge 40 Neo’s superior battery efficiency means you’ll likely spend less time tethered to a charger overall.
❓ How does the Helio G99 Ultimate perform in demanding games like PUBG Mobile or Genshin Impact?
The Helio G99 Ultimate can run PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings, but may struggle with Genshin Impact at higher graphical presets. Expect some frame drops and potential stuttering in more demanding titles. The Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 will provide a smoother and more consistent gaming experience in these games.
