The Tecno Camon 30 Pro and Motorola Edge 40 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 30 Pro aims for all-around excellence, while the Edge 40 Neo prioritizes a sleek design and balanced feature set. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device delivers the best value and performance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing battery life and sustained performance, the Tecno Camon 30 Pro emerges as the winner. Its significantly longer 14:29h active use score, coupled with the more powerful Dimensity 8200 Ultimate, outweighs the Edge 40 Neo’s brighter display and faster initial charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 27 | 2023, September 14 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, April 02 | Available. Released 2023, September 14 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, glass back or silicone polymer back (eco leather) | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 164 x 74.5 x 7.7 mm (6.46 x 2.93 x 0.30 in) | 159.6 x 72 x 7.9 mm (6.28 x 2.83 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM + eSIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 188.6 g (6.67 oz) | 170 g or 172 g (6.00 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2436 pixels (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~402 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.78 inches, 109.9 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.55 inches, 103.6 cm2 (~90.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 144Hz | P-OLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1300 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate (4 nm) | MediaTek Dimensity 7030 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Mali-G610 MC3 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 256GB 12GB RAM, 512GB 12GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.55", 1.0µm, multi-directional PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, PDAF |
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | Yes | - |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 0-100% in 47 min | 68W wired, 50% in 15 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iceland Basaltic Dark, Alps Snowy Silver | Black, Soothing Sea, Caneel Bay, Peach Fuzz |
| Models | CL8 | XT2307-1 |
| Price | - | $ 299.00 / € 168.73 / ₹ 19,900 |
Tecno Camon 30 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (14:29h active use)
- Powerful Dimensity 8200 Ultimate chipset
- Faster full charge time (47 minutes)
- Slightly lower peak display brightness
- Design may be less premium than the Edge 40 Neo
Motorola Edge 40 Neo
- Brighter display (1073 nits)
- Sleek and stylish design
- Faster initial charging (50% in 15 minutes)
- Significantly shorter battery life (10:28h active use)
- Less powerful Dimensity 7030 chipset
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 40 Neo boasts a brighter display, reaching 1073 nits, compared to the Tecno Camon 30 Pro’s 998 nits. While the difference is noticeable, the Camon 30 Pro’s panel is still perfectly usable. Neither manufacturer specifies panel technology (LTPO or not), but both are likely high refresh rate OLEDs. The Edge 40 Neo’s higher peak brightness will be more beneficial in direct sunlight, while the Camon 30 Pro’s display is still vibrant and clear for indoor use. Bezels appear comparable based on available imagery, and color accuracy is likely similar without detailed calibration data.
Camera Comparison
Detailed camera analysis is limited by the provided data. Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but sensor specifics are missing. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes a direct comparison difficult. However, the market positioning suggests the Camon 30 Pro may prioritize camera features, potentially offering a larger main sensor. The Edge 40 Neo likely focuses on a balanced camera system with a strong emphasis on software processing. We can assume both phones include standard features like HDR and night mode, but image quality will depend heavily on the underlying hardware and software algorithms.
Performance
The Tecno Camon 30 Pro’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate (4nm) significantly outperforms the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s Dimensity 7030 (6nm). The 8200 Ultimate features a more powerful CPU configuration – a 3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 prime core versus the 7030’s 2.5 GHz Cortex-A78. This translates to faster app loading, smoother multitasking, and superior gaming performance. The 4nm process node of the 8200 Ultimate also contributes to better thermal efficiency, reducing the likelihood of throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Edge 40 Neo’s CPU, while capable, is geared towards efficiency rather than raw power.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 30 Pro delivers a substantial advantage in battery life, achieving 14:29 hours of active use compared to the Motorola Edge 40 Neo’s 10:28 hours. While the Edge 40 Neo boasts a faster initial charging speed – 50% in 15 minutes with its 68W charger – the Camon 30 Pro’s 70W charging still achieves a full charge in 47 minutes. The Camon 30 Pro’s superior endurance is a key differentiator, making it ideal for users who heavily rely on their smartphones throughout the day. The Edge 40 Neo’s faster initial charge is convenient, but the Camon 30 Pro’s overall battery capacity and efficiency provide a more significant benefit.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 Pro if you need exceptional battery life for all-day use, demand strong performance for gaming and multitasking, and prioritize a feature-rich experience. Buy the Motorola Edge 40 Neo if you prefer a more compact and stylish design, value a brighter display for outdoor visibility, and appreciate Motorola’s clean software experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Dimensity 8200 Ultimate in the Camon 30 Pro get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 8200 Ultimate’s 4nm process node is designed for improved thermal efficiency. While some heat generation is inevitable during intensive gaming, the Camon 30 Pro is less likely to experience significant throttling compared to devices with less efficient chipsets. The larger surface area of the phone also aids in heat dissipation.
❓ How does the 6nm Dimensity 7030 in the Edge 40 Neo handle demanding applications?
The Dimensity 7030 is a capable chipset for everyday tasks and moderate gaming. However, it will likely exhibit more performance throttling under sustained load compared to the Camon 30 Pro’s Dimensity 8200 Ultimate. Users primarily focused on social media, browsing, and casual gaming will find the Edge 40 Neo sufficient.
❓ Is the 68W charging on the Edge 40 Neo significantly faster in real-world use than the 70W on the Camon 30 Pro?
While the Edge 40 Neo charges to 50% in 15 minutes, the Camon 30 Pro reaches 100% in 47 minutes. The initial burst speed is faster on the Motorola, but the Camon 30 Pro’s overall charging time isn’t drastically slower, and its larger battery capacity means you’re topping up more total energy.
