vivo iQOO 12 Pro vs Tecno Camon 30 Premier: A Deep Dive into Performance and Value
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the power user prioritizing raw performance and rapid charging, the vivo iQOO 12 Pro is the clear winner. However, the Tecno Camon 30 Premier offers exceptional battery life and a compelling feature set for those seeking a balanced flagship experience without the top-tier price tag.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Camon 30 Premier | vivo iQOO 12 Pro |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 26, 28, 66, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / CDMA2000 / LTE / 5G |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2024, February 27 | 2023, November 07 |
| Status | Available. Released 2024, May | Available. Released 2023, November 14 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame, aluminum back with silicone polymer finish (eco leather) | - |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 76.2 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 3.00 x 0.31 in) | 164.6 x 75.4 x 8.6 mm or 8.8 mm |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 210 g (7.41 oz) | 205 g or 210 g (7.23 oz) |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 | - |
| Resolution | 1264 x 2780 pixels (~451 ppi density) | 1440 x 3200 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~518 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.77 inches, 111.4 cm2 (~89.9% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 111.0 cm2 (~89.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, HDR, 1400 nits (HBM) | LTPO AMOLED, 1B colors, 144Hz, HDR10+, 1600 nits (HBM), 3000 nits (peak) |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.1 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.3 GHz Cortex-X4 & 3x3.2 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x3.0 GHz Cortex-A720 & 2x2.3 GHz Cortex-A520) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate (4 nm) | Qualcomm SM8650-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G610 MC6 | Adreno 750 |
| OS | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, HIOS 14 | Android 14, up to 2 major Android upgrades, Funtouch 14 (International), OriginOS 4 (China) |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 12GB RAM | 256GB 16GB RAM, 512GB 16GB RAM, 1TB 16GB RAM |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama | Color spectrum sensor, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.9, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS 50 MP, f/2.2, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.2, 14mm, 114˚ (ultrawide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF | 50 MP, f/1.7, 23mm (wide), 1/1.3", 1.2µm, ulti-directional PDAF, OIS 64 MP, f/2.6, 70mm (periscope telephoto), 1/2.0", PDAF, OIS, 3x optical zoom 50 MP, f/2.0, 15mm, 119˚ (ultrawide), AF |
| Video | 4K@30/60fps (HDR), 1080p@30fps | 8K@30fps, 4K@24/30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 50 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.64µm, PDAF | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 35mm jack | No | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with dual speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.3, A2DP, LE | 5.4, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| Infrared port | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, ultrasonic), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 70W wired, 100% in 45 min | 120W wired 50W wireless 10W reverse wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5100 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Alps Snowy Silver, Hawaii Lava Black | Black, Red, White (BMW M branding) |
| Models | CL9 | V2329A |
| Price | ₹ 29,999 | About 650 EUR |
Tecno Camon 30 Premier
- Exceptional battery life (13:29h active use)
- Competitive price point
- Fast 70W wired charging
- Older chipset (Dimensity 8200 Ultimate)
- Lower peak display brightness
vivo iQOO 12 Pro
- Cutting-edge Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 performance
- Blazing-fast 120W wired charging
- Wireless and reverse wireless charging
- Potentially shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
- Higher price tag
Display Comparison
The Tecno Camon 30 Premier’s display reaches a measured peak brightness of 854 nits, providing good visibility in most conditions. While respectable, this falls short of the expected brightness levels often found in flagship devices. The iQOO 12 Pro, though lacking specific brightness data, is likely to exceed this figure given its flagship positioning and the typical capabilities of AMOLED panels in this class. Both devices utilize a 4nm process for their respective chipsets, indirectly impacting display power efficiency. The iQOO 12 Pro likely benefits from a higher refresh rate and potentially LTPO technology for adaptive refresh rates, contributing to smoother visuals and improved battery life during less demanding tasks.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications, a direct comparison is limited. However, the iQOO 12 Pro, as a flagship, is expected to feature a more advanced camera system with larger sensors and more sophisticated image processing. The Dimensity 8200 Ultimate’s ISP is capable, but the Snapdragon 8 Gen 3’s ISP offers enhanced features like 8K video recording and improved low-light performance. The iQOO 12 Pro likely prioritizes computational photography, leveraging its processing power for superior image quality. The Tecno Camon 30 Premier may focus on delivering a good all-around camera experience, but will likely fall short of the iQOO 12 Pro in challenging conditions.
Performance
The vivo iQOO 12 Pro’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 chipset, built on a 4nm process, represents a significant leap in performance over the Tecno Camon 30 Premier’s Mediatek Dimensity 8200 Ultimate. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 3 features a Cortex-X4 prime core clocked at 3.3 GHz, compared to the Camon 30 Premier’s Cortex-A78 core at 3.1 GHz. This architectural difference translates to faster single-core performance and improved efficiency. The iQOO 12 Pro’s GPU will also deliver substantially higher graphics performance, making it the superior choice for demanding mobile games. While the Dimensity 8200 Ultimate is a capable chip, it’s a generation behind and will show its limitations in the most intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 30 Premier shines with an active use battery score of 13:29 hours, indicating excellent battery life. While the iQOO 12 Pro’s battery capacity is unknown, its 120W wired charging dwarfs the Camon 30 Premier’s 70W charging. The iQOO 12 Pro can reach 100% charge in approximately 30 minutes, while the Camon 30 Premier takes 45 minutes. The iQOO 12 Pro also adds 50W wireless and 10W reverse wireless charging, features absent on the Camon 30 Premier. The iQOO 12 Pro’s faster charging mitigates any potential battery capacity disadvantage.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 30 Premier if you need exceptional battery endurance for all-day use and value a well-rounded feature set without breaking the bank. Buy the vivo iQOO 12 Pro if you prioritize uncompromising performance for gaming and demanding tasks, and demand the fastest possible charging speeds available on an Android device.