The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Tecno Camon 20 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect, helping you make the right choice.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro takes the crown thanks to its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and more powerful Dimensity 1080 chipset. While the Camon 20 Pro has its strengths, the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a more well-rounded and premium experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 09 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.7 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | CK7n | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | - | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 490526 (v9)
GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 20 Pro
- Sleek design
- Potentially more affordable
- Decent camera
- Less powerful chipset
- Slower charging
- Lower display brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Faster charging (67W)
- Brighter display (890 nits)
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Excellent battery life
- Potentially higher price
- Design may be less distinctive
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a significant advantage with its 890 nits max brightness, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Its infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent image quality. The Camon 20 Pro's display is likely good, but lacks the raw brightness and contrast of the Redmi Note 12 Pro. Expect more vibrant colors and deeper blacks on the Xiaomi.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Redmi Note 12 Pro likely has an edge due to the Dimensity 1080's image signal processor (ISP), potentially leading to better image processing and low-light performance. Both offer Photo/Video capabilities.
Performance
The Mediatek Dimensity 1080 in the Redmi Note 12 Pro is noticeably more powerful than the Helio G99 in the Camon 20 Pro. This translates to smoother multitasking, faster app loading times, and better gaming performance. While the Camon 20 Pro is capable, the Redmi Note 12 Pro offers a more premium and responsive experience.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro shines here with an impressive endurance rating of 97 hours and a remarkable 67W wired charging. It can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 46 minutes. The Camon 20 Pro's 33W charging is slower, and while its battery life is likely decent, it doesn't match the Redmi Note 12 Pro's exceptional performance.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Camon 20 Pro is ideal for users prioritizing a sleek design and potentially a slightly more affordable price. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is the better choice for those who value fast charging, a vibrant display, and a more powerful processor for smoother performance and gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro's Dimensity 1080 chipset provides significantly better gaming performance than the Tecno Camon 20 Pro's Helio G99.
❓ How does the charging speed compare?
The Redmi Note 12 Pro's 67W charging is much faster than the Camon 20 Pro's 33W charging, allowing for quicker top-ups.
