Google Pixel 7a vs Tecno Camon 20 Pro: A Detailed Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Google Pixel 7a is the superior choice. Its Tensor G2 chipset provides significantly faster performance and unlocks advanced features like Magic Eraser, while its camera consistently delivers exceptional image quality. However, the Tecno Camon 20 Pro offers compelling value for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize battery life and don't need top-tier processing power.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Camon 20 Pro | Google Pixel 7a |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 71 - GWKK3, G0DZQ |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 14, 20, 25, 28, 30, 38, 41, 48, 66, 71, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GWKK3 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 20, 25, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - GHL1X, G82U8 | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, May 10 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 09 | Available. Released 2023, May 10 |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 163.4 x 76.7 x 7.8 mm (6.43 x 3.02 x 0.31 in) | 152 x 72.9 x 9 mm (5.98 x 2.87 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + eSIM |
| Weight | - | 193.5 g (6.84 oz) |
| - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~429 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~85.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.1 inches, 90.7 cm2 (~81.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | OLED, HDR, 90Hz |
| Always-on display | Always-on display | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.85 GHz Cortex-X1 & 2x2.35 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.80 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Helio G99 (6 nm) | Google Tensor G2 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G710 MP7 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, up to 5 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM |
| - | UFS 3.1 | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.73", 0.8µm, dual pixel PDAF, OIS 13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, Pixel Shift, Auto-HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 25mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, OIS |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 13 MP, f/2.2, 20mm (ultrawide), 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | - | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS, QZSS, NavIC |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.2 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e, tri-band |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass, barometer |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 18W wired, PD3.0 7.5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4385 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Predawn Black, Serenity Blue | Charcoal, Snow, Sea, Coral |
| Models | CK7n | GWKK3, GHL1X, G0DZQ, G82U8 |
| Price | - | € 179.90 / $ 150.00 / £ 170.00 / ₹ 25,980 |
Tecno Camon 20 Pro
- Superior performance with Google Tensor G2
- Exceptional camera quality and image processing
- Guaranteed software updates and long-term support
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Camon 20 Pro
Google Pixel 7a
- Faster 33W wired charging
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Significantly slower performance
- Inferior camera quality and image processing
Display Comparison
The Pixel 7a boasts a measured peak brightness of 1070 nits, ensuring excellent visibility even in direct sunlight. While the Camon 20 Pro’s display specifications aren’t provided, it’s likely to be lower, impacting outdoor usability. The Pixel 7a’s OLED panel, combined with Google’s image processing, will deliver more accurate colors and deeper blacks. The absence of LTPO technology on either device means neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving, but the Pixel’s superior brightness and color accuracy give it a clear edge.
Camera Comparison
The Pixel 7a’s camera system benefits from Google’s renowned computational photography. While specific sensor details aren’t provided, the Pixel’s image processing algorithms consistently produce excellent dynamic range, accurate colors, and impressive low-light performance. The Camon 20 Pro’s camera capabilities are less defined, and the inclusion of a likely low-resolution macro lens is a common marketing tactic that rarely delivers meaningful results. The Pixel 7a’s video recording capabilities are also expected to be superior, leveraging the Tensor G2’s image signal processor.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Google Pixel 7a’s Tensor G2, fabricated on a 5nm process, features a prime Cortex-X1 core clocked at 2.85 GHz, offering substantial performance gains over the Tecno Camon 20 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G99 (6nm). The G99, while efficient, relies on older Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.2 GHz. This translates to significantly faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the Pixel 7a. The Tensor G2 also excels in AI tasks, powering features like voice recognition and image processing. While the Camon 20 Pro is adequate for everyday tasks, the Pixel 7a is the clear winner for demanding users and gamers.
Battery Life
The Pixel 7a has an endurance rating of 76 hours, indicating solid battery life. The Camon 20 Pro, with its 33W wired charging, offers faster charging speeds than the Pixel 7a’s 18W charging (with PD3.0). However, the Pixel 7a also supports 7.5W wireless charging, a convenience the Camon 20 Pro lacks. The G99’s efficiency in the Camon 20 Pro may offset the Pixel’s larger battery capacity in some usage scenarios, but the Pixel’s optimized software and power management contribute to a consistently reliable experience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 20 Pro if you need a long-lasting battery and prioritize value for money, accepting compromises in processing power and camera sophistication. Buy the Google Pixel 7a if you value a smooth, responsive user experience, exceptional camera capabilities powered by Google’s AI, and guaranteed software updates, even if it means slightly slower charging and a potentially shorter battery life.