The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G and the Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly reigns supreme? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Poco X5 Pro takes the lead with its significantly faster charging, brighter display, and generally more polished software experience. However, the Camon 20 Pro 5G boasts a more powerful chipset and a potentially better camera system, making it a strong contender for those prioritizing performance and photography.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - International |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, February 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 09 | Available. Released 2023, February 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 162.7 x 75.9 x 7.8 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) | 162.9 x 76 x 7.9 mm (6.41 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~87.0% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.2 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x1.9 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7325 Snapdragon 778G 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 642L |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, MIUI 14 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | No |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Ring-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.2 (Intl), 5.1 (India), A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi DirectWi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band - India |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 45 min
5W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue | Astral Black, Horizon Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CK8n | 22101320G, 22101320I |
| Price | About 270 EUR | € 156.00 / $ 221.33 / ₹ 22,490 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 531398 (v9)
GeekBench: 2930 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 28fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G
- Potentially better camera performance
- More powerful chipset (Dimensity 8050)
- 5G Connectivity
- Sleek Design (often with leather or glass back)
- Slower charging (33W)
- Software experience may be less polished than MIUI
- Brightness not specified
Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro
- Faster charging (67W)
- Brighter display (912 nits)
- Smooth MIUI software
- Reverse wired charging
- Slightly less powerful chipset (Snapdragon 778G 5G)
- Camera may not be as impressive as the Camon 20 Pro 5G
- Design can be less premium
Display Comparison
The Poco X5 Pro's 912 nits max brightness gives it a clear advantage in outdoor visibility. While the Camon 20 Pro 5G's display is likely good, it lacks the measured brightness data to compete. The Poco X5 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio suggests excellent blacks and vibrant colors, though this is a nominal value. Both phones likely feature AMOLED panels for rich colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Camon 20 Pro 5G is often touted for its camera capabilities. While specific camera specs are missing, the Dimensity 8050 often pairs with better image signal processors (ISPs). The Poco X5 Pro's camera is likely solid, but may not match the Camon's potential for detail and dynamic range. Low-light performance will be a key differentiator.
Performance
The Dimensity 8050 in the Camon 20 Pro 5G generally outperforms the Snapdragon 778G 5G in the Poco X5 Pro in raw processing power, particularly in graphics-intensive tasks. However, Xiaomi's MIUI optimization often provides a smooth and responsive experience despite the slightly less powerful chipset. Real-world performance will depend on software optimization and usage patterns.
Battery Life
The Poco X5 Pro's 67W charging is a significant advantage, allowing for a full charge in just 45 minutes. The Camon 20 Pro 5G's 33W charging is slower. Both phones boast impressive endurance ratings (113h for the Poco X5 Pro), suggesting excellent battery life under moderate usage. The reverse wired charging on the Poco X5 Pro is a nice bonus.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G is ideal for users who prioritize gaming and demanding applications, and those who value a potentially superior camera experience. The Xiaomi Poco X5 Pro is a great choice for users who want fast charging, a vibrant display, and a smooth, reliable user experience at a competitive price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Tecno Camon 20 Pro 5G's Dimensity 8050 chipset generally offers better gaming performance than the Poco X5 Pro's Snapdragon 778G 5G.
❓ Is the Poco X5 Pro's 'infinite' contrast ratio a real measurement?
No, 'infinite' contrast ratio is a nominal value used to indicate very high contrast. Actual contrast ratios are finite and difficult to measure precisely.
