The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Tecno Camon 20 Premier and the Xiaomi Poco F5. Both offer compelling features at attractive price points, but which one truly delivers the best overall experience? Let's dive into a detailed comparison.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Poco F5 emerges as the winner, thanks to its superior Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset, brighter display, and faster charging. While the Camon 20 Premier boasts impressive battery endurance, the Poco F5's overall performance and features make it the more compelling choice for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, May 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 09 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 74.3 x 8.2 mm (6.37 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) | 161.1 x 75 x 7.9 mm (6.34 x 2.95 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202.5 g (7.16 oz) | 181 g (6.38 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~88.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 68B colors, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 120Hz, 500 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | Always-on display | - |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.91 GHz Cortex-X2 & 3x2.49 GHz Cortex-A710 & 4x1.8 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM7475-AB Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 725 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13 | Android 13, upgradable to Android 15, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 3.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, sensor-shift OIS
108 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | 24-bit/192kHz audio | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC4, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue | Black, Blue, White |
| Models | CK9n | 23049PCD8G, 23049PCD8I |
| Price | About 410 EUR | € 202.76 / $ 289.99 / ₹ 23,790 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.08 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 1.00 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 118h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-24.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
Tecno Camon 20 Premier
- Exceptional battery life
- Sleek and stylish design
- Potentially strong camera performance (marketing focus)
- Less powerful chipset compared to Poco F5
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging speed
Xiaomi Poco F5
- Superior performance with Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2
- Brighter and more vibrant display
- Faster 67W charging
- Excellent value for money
- Design might be less premium than Camon 20 Premier
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Display Comparison
The Poco F5 takes a clear lead in the display department. Its 963 nits peak brightness significantly outshines the Camon 20 Premier's 684 nits, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. The Poco F5's 'Infinite' contrast ratio (nominal) suggests excellent image quality, while the Camon 20 Premier's display is still respectable but lacks the same punch. Both likely use AMOLED panels, offering vibrant colors and deep blacks.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but detailed camera comparisons require more in-depth testing. The Camon 20 Premier is often marketed for its camera capabilities, potentially featuring a high-resolution main sensor. The Poco F5 likely offers a versatile setup with a good main sensor, ultrawide, and potentially a macro lens. Image processing and software features will play a crucial role in determining the overall camera experience.
Performance
The Poco F5's Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset is a substantial upgrade over the Camon 20 Premier's Dimensity 8050. The Snapdragon chip's superior architecture and 4nm process provide noticeably faster performance in demanding tasks like gaming and video editing. The Poco F5 will handle multitasking and resource-intensive apps with greater ease.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 20 Premier demonstrates impressive battery endurance, boasting an endurance rating of 107 hours (old data). However, the Poco F5 also performs well with an endurance rating of 118 hours (old data) and an active use score of 11:52h. The Poco F5's 67W charging is significantly faster than the Camon 20 Premier's 45W, allowing for quicker top-ups.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Camon 20 Premier is ideal for users prioritizing exceptional battery life and a sleek design. The Xiaomi Poco F5 is perfect for gamers, content creators, and anyone seeking top-tier performance and a vibrant display without breaking the bank.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Poco F5 is significantly better for gaming due to its more powerful Snapdragon 7+ Gen 2 chipset.
❓ Does the Tecno Camon 20 Premier have a better camera?
While Tecno often markets its Camon series for camera capabilities, a direct comparison requires more detailed testing. Both phones offer capable cameras, but the Poco F5's image processing and hardware could potentially be competitive.
