Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate vs. Tecno Camon 20 Premier: A Deep Dive Comparison
| Phones Images | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing camera quality and everyday usability, the Tecno Camon 20 Premier offers a compelling package. However, the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate is the clear winner for dedicated mobile gamers who demand the highest possible performance and specialized features, despite its higher price point.
| PHONES | ||
|---|---|---|
| Phone Names | Tecno Camon 20 Premier | Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate |
| Network | ||
|---|---|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 48, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 2, 3, 5, 7, 8, 12, 18, 20, 25, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41, 48, 66, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE (Up to 7CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 41, 77, 78, 79 SA/NSA/Sub6 - China | |
| Launch | ||
|---|---|---|
| Announced | 2023, May 09 | 2023, April 13 |
| Status | Available. Released 2023, May 09 | Available. Released 2023, May |
| Body | ||
|---|---|---|
| Build | Glass front, leather back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass Victus), glass back (Gorilla Glass 3), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 161.9 x 74.3 x 8.2 mm (6.37 x 2.93 x 0.32 in) | 173 x 77 x 10.3 mm (6.81 x 3.03 x 0.41 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 202.5 g (7.16 oz) | 239 g (8.43 oz) |
| - | Built-in motorized cooling air vent (AeroActive Portal) IP54 water resistant 2" OLED display (on the back) Pressure sensitive zones (Gaming triggers) | |
| Display | ||
|---|---|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass Victus |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2448 pixels (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~89.3% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.78 inches, 109.5 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 165Hz, HDR10+, 1000 nits (HBM), 1500 nits (peak) |
| Always-on display | - | |
| Platform | ||
|---|---|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (1x3.0 GHz Cortex-A78 & 3x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 4x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x3.2 GHz Cortex-X3 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A715 & 2x2.8 GHz Cortex-A710 & 3x2.0 GHz Cortex-A510) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 8050 (6 nm) | Qualcomm SM8550-AB Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 | Adreno 740 |
| OS | Android 13, HIOS 13 | Android 13, up to 2 major Android upgrades |
| Memory | ||
|---|---|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 512GB 8GB RAM | 512GB 16GB RAM |
| - | UFS 4.0 NTFS support for external storage | |
| Main Camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Ring-LED flash, HDR, panorama | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 50 MP, f/1.8, 23mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, sensor-shift OIS 108 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 115˚ (ultrawide), PDAF Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF 13 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 120˚ (ultrawide) 5 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, HDR | 8K@24fps, 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/120/240fps, 720p@480fps; gyro-EIS, HDR10+ |
| Selfie camera | ||
|---|---|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Panorama, HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 24mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.5, 29mm (wide), 1/3.2", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound | ||
|---|---|---|
| 3.5mm jack | No | Yes |
| 35mm jack | No | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes, with stereo speakers | Yes, with stereo speakers (2 amplifiers) |
| 24-bit/192kHz audio | 32-bit/384kHz audio | |
| Comms | ||
|---|---|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.2, A2DP, LE | 5.3, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive, aptX Lossless |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS (L1), BDS (B1I+B1c+B2a), GALILEO (E1+E5a), QZSS (L1+L5), NavIC (L5) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1 (side), DisplayPort 1.4; USB Type-C 2.0 (bottom), OTG, accessory connector |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6e/7, tri-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features | ||
|---|---|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery | ||
|---|---|---|
| Charging | 45W wired | 65W wired, PD3.0, QC5, 100% in 42 min 10W reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 6000 mAh |
| Misc | ||
|---|---|---|
| Colors | Dark Welkin, Serenity Blue | Storm White |
| Models | CK9n | - |
| Price | About 410 EUR | About 780 EUR |
| Tests | ||
|---|---|---|
| Battery life | - | Endurance rating 131h |
| Camera | - | Photo / Video |
| Display | - | Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - | -25.5 LUFS (Very good) |
| Performance | - | AnTuTu: 1325105 (v9) GeekBench: 5139 (v5.5), 5567 (v6) GFXBench: 107fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 20 Premier
- Potentially superior camera system for the price
- Competitive price point
- Solid all-around performance with Dimensity 8050
- Less powerful chipset compared to Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Lower display brightness
- Slower charging speed
Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate
- Unmatched gaming performance with Snapdragon 8 Gen 2
- Brighter, higher refresh rate display
- Faster charging and longer battery life
- Significantly higher price
- Camera likely secondary to gaming features
- Larger and heavier form factor
Display Comparison
The Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate boasts a significantly brighter display at 1095 nits compared to the Tecno Camon 20 Premier’s 684 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While both devices feature panels capable of displaying video, the ROG Phone’s infinite contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a deeper black level and more vibrant colors. The ROG Phone’s higher refresh rate (likely 165Hz, based on ROG Phone history) will provide a smoother gaming experience, while the Camon 20 Premier’s panel specifications are not provided, suggesting a standard 60Hz or 90Hz refresh rate. The ROG Phone’s display is geared towards immersive gaming, while the Camon 20 Premier prioritizes a good, but not class-leading, visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having photo and video capabilities, but the details are sparse. The Tecno Camon 20 Premier is likely to focus on camera features, potentially with a high-resolution main sensor (though not specified). The ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s camera system is typically secondary to its gaming features. Without specific sensor size or aperture information, it’s difficult to make a direct comparison. However, given the ROG Phone’s gaming focus, it’s reasonable to assume the Camon 20 Premier will offer a more refined and versatile camera experience. The ROG Phone’s camera is likely adequate for casual use, but won’t compete with dedicated camera-centric phones.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate’s Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 (4nm) is a flagship processor built on a more efficient node than the Tecno Camon 20 Premier’s Dimensity 8050 (6nm). This 4nm process gives the Snapdragon a thermal advantage, reducing throttling during sustained workloads like gaming. The Snapdragon 8 Gen 2’s CPU configuration – Cortex-X3, A715, and A710 cores – is architecturally superior to the Dimensity 8050’s Cortex-A78 and A55 cores, offering better single-core and multi-core performance. While the Dimensity 8050 is a capable chip, the Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 provides a substantial performance uplift, particularly in graphically demanding games. The ROG Phone also benefits from faster RAM (likely LPDDR5x) which further enhances performance.
Battery Life
The Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate edges out the Tecno Camon 20 Premier in battery endurance with a rating of 131 hours versus 107 hours. This is likely due to a combination of a larger battery capacity (not specified, but typically around 6000mAh in ROG Phones) and the more efficient Snapdragon 8 Gen 2 chipset. The ROG Phone also boasts faster 65W wired charging with support for PD3.0 and QC5, achieving a full charge in just 42 minutes, compared to the Camon 20 Premier’s 45W charging. The ROG Phone also includes 10W reverse wired charging, a feature absent on the Camon 20 Premier. While the Camon 20 Premier offers respectable battery life, the ROG Phone provides superior longevity and faster charging speeds.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 20 Premier if you need a versatile smartphone with a strong emphasis on photography and a balanced feature set. It’s ideal for content creators, social media enthusiasts, and users who want a premium experience without breaking the bank. Buy the Asus ROG Phone 7 Ultimate if you prioritize uncompromising gaming performance, extended battery life during intense sessions, and features like AirTriggers and a high refresh rate display – even if it means sacrificing some camera versatility and paying a premium.