The Tecno Camon 19 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a feature-rich experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to chipset selection and charging technology, creating a clear divergence in their strengths and weaknesses. This comparison will dissect these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a more modern chipset, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G, built on a 6nm process, offers improved efficiency and 5G connectivity, while the 67W charging significantly reduces downtime. However, the Tecno Camon 19 remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 166.6 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm (6.56 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Eco Black, Sea Salt White, Digital Green | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | CI6n | 2201116SI |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
Tecno Camon 19
- More affordable price point
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Acceptable battery life for light users
- Older, less efficient chipset
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Limited 5G support
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster and more efficient Snapdragon 695 5G
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Higher price compared to Tecno Camon 19
- May experience some thermal throttling under heavy load
- Software experience can be cluttered with Xiaomi's MIUI
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display, but key differences exist. While specific display specs (resolution, refresh rate) are missing for the Camon 19, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G likely features a higher quality AMOLED panel, common for Xiaomi's 'Pro' series. The Redmi's panel benefits from the more efficient Snapdragon 695, allowing for potentially better sustained brightness. Bezels are likely comparable, given the market segment, but the Redmi's display technology is a clear advantage.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the main sensor, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is known for its 108MP main sensor (not mentioned in the provided data, but standard for this model), which generally outperforms the sensors found in Tecno's Camon series. The Snapdragon 695’s image signal processor (ISP) also contributes to better image processing, particularly in low-light conditions. While both phones likely include standard features like HDR and portrait modes, the Redmi’s superior hardware gives it an edge in image quality.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) is a significant step up from the Tecno Camon 19’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm process node of the Snapdragon 695 translates to better power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. The Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, also outperform the Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive gaming experience on the Redmi. While the Camon 19 is adequate for everyday tasks, the Redmi is better equipped for demanding applications.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W wired charging is the standout feature here. Advertised to reach 50% charge in 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes, it drastically reduces charging times compared to the Tecno Camon 19’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the Redmi’s faster charging mitigates the impact of a potentially smaller battery. The Snapdragon 695’s efficiency also contributes to better battery life, allowing the Redmi to potentially last longer on a single charge despite the faster charging cycle.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 if you need a functional smartphone for everyday tasks and prioritize affordability above all else. Its Helio G85 chipset is sufficient for basic usage, and the 18W charging is adequate for casual users. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, faster charging speeds, and future-proof 5G connectivity. The Snapdragon 695 offers a noticeable performance uplift, especially in demanding applications.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile smoothly?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at medium to high settings with stable frame rates. While it won't deliver a flagship-level gaming experience, it provides a noticeable improvement over the Helio G85 in the Tecno Camon 19, offering smoother gameplay and reduced lag.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Tecno Camon 19 in real-world usage?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is dramatically faster. While the Tecno Camon 19 will take well over two hours to fully charge, the Redmi can reach 100% in approximately 42 minutes (advertised). This means significantly less downtime and more time using your phone.
❓ Is the difference in chipset performance between the Helio G85 and Snapdragon 695 noticeable for everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
Yes, the difference is noticeable. The Snapdragon 695 offers a smoother and more responsive experience for everyday tasks. App loading times are faster, multitasking is more fluid, and scrolling through social media feeds feels less laggy compared to the Tecno Camon 19.
