The budget smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Tecno Camon 19 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 are two strong contenders. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will break down every aspect to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 edges out the Camon 19 thanks to its faster charging, more efficient chipset, and brighter display. While the Camon 19 has its strengths, the Redmi Note 11 provides a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, February 09 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 166.6 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm (6.56 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 159.9 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.30 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 179 g (6.31 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 3 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, 700 nits, 1000 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (4x2.4 GHz Kryo 265 Gold & 4x1.9 GHz Kryo 265 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6225 Snapdragon 680 4G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 610 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, HyperOS |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 13 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.1", 1.12µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 100% in 60 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Eco Black, Sea Salt White, Digital Green | Graphite Gray, Twilight Blue, Star Blue |
| Models | CI6n | 2201117TG, 2201117TI, 2201117TY, 2201117TL |
| Price | - | £ 95.00 / € 97.99 / ₹ 11,950 |
| SAR | - | 0.97 W/kg (head) 0.93 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 126h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 228044 (v8), 244526 (v9)
GeekBench: 1662 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 6.8fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19
- Potentially better camera features
- Vibrant display
- Stylish design
- Slower charging
- Less efficient chipset
- Lower display brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11
- Faster charging (33W)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 680)
- Brighter display
- Excellent battery life
- Camera may not be as advanced as Camon 19
- Design might be less striking
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 11 boasts a significantly brighter display (736 nits vs. Camon 19's likely lower brightness, estimated around 400-500 nits based on similar Tecno models) and an 'infinite' contrast ratio, offering a more immersive viewing experience. While the Camon 19's display is likely color-accurate, the Redmi Note 11's brightness advantage is noticeable in outdoor conditions.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Camon 19 is often marketed for its camera capabilities. While specific camera specs are missing, the Camon 19 likely features a higher resolution main sensor. The Redmi Note 11's camera is still very good, producing detailed and vibrant photos in good lighting conditions. Low-light performance is likely comparable.
Performance
The Snapdragon 680 in the Redmi Note 11 is more efficient and generally faster than the Helio G85 in the Camon 19. The 6nm process gives the Redmi Note 11 an edge in power efficiency and thermal management, leading to smoother multitasking and gaming. The Camon 19 is adequate for everyday tasks, but the Redmi Note 11 offers a more responsive feel.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 shines in battery life, boasting an impressive endurance rating of 126 hours. The Camon 19's battery life is respectable, but not as exceptional. Furthermore, the Redmi Note 11's 33W fast charging is a significant advantage, fully charging the phone in just 60 minutes, compared to the Camon 19's slower 18W charging.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Camon 19 is ideal for users prioritizing camera features and a vibrant display for media consumption. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 is a better choice for those seeking faster performance, quicker charging, and longer battery life in a reliable package.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11's Snapdragon 680 chipset and better thermal management make it the better choice for gaming.
❓ Does the Redmi Note 11 support 5G?
No, both the Tecno Camon 19 and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 are 4G devices.
❓ What is the storage capacity of each phone?
Storage options vary by region, but both phones typically offer configurations ranging from 64GB to 128GB, often with expandable storage via microSD card.
