Tecno continues to deliver impressive smartphones at affordable prices. The Camon 19 and Spark 10 Pro are two popular contenders, each offering a unique set of features. This comprehensive comparison will help you decide which phone best suits your budget and priorities.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Tecno Spark 10 Pro edges out the Camon 19 thanks to its slightly better chipset (Helio G88 vs G85), brighter display, and exceptional battery life. While both offer great value, the Spark 10 Pro provides a more well-rounded experience for most users.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2023, March 06 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2023, March 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back |
| Dimensions | 166.6 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm (6.56 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 168.4 x 76.2 x 8.4 mm (6.63 x 3.00 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 208 g (7.34 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~396 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.8 inches, 109.3 cm2 (~85.1% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 13, HIOS 12.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
0.08 MP, (depth) |
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lens |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 50 MP, f/1.6, (wide), PDAF
other unspecified cameras |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, (wide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1440p@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.3, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 b/g/n |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Eco Black, Sea Salt White, Digital Green | Starry Black, Pearl White |
| Models | CI6n | KI7 |
| Price | - | £ 245.74 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 131h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1991:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 249938 (v9)
GeekBench: 1358 (v5.1), 1376 (v6)
GFXBench: 8.1fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19
- Potentially better selfie camera
- Sleek design
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Lower brightness display
- Slightly weaker chipset
- Likely shorter battery life
Tecno Spark 10 Pro
- Brighter display (521 nits)
- Slightly better chipset (Helio G88)
- Exceptional battery life (131h endurance)
- Good value for money
- Design may be less premium
- Camera performance needs further evaluation
Display Comparison
Both phones feature impressive contrast ratios (1991:1), but the Spark 10 Pro boasts a significantly higher measured brightness of 521 nits compared to the Camon 19's likely lower brightness. This makes the Spark 10 Pro easier to view in direct sunlight. Both likely use similar LCD panels, offering good color reproduction for the price.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems for their price range. The Camon 19 is often marketed with a focus on its selfie camera, potentially featuring a higher resolution front-facing sensor. The Spark 10 Pro likely emphasizes its main rear camera with features like AI scene detection. Detailed camera comparisons would require specific sensor and software information, which is currently limited.
Performance
The Spark 10 Pro's Helio G88 chipset provides a slight performance advantage over the Camon 19's Helio G85. While both are based on the same CPU architecture (Octa-core with Cortex-A75 and A55 cores), the G88 generally offers better GPU performance and slightly improved efficiency. Expect smoother multitasking and slightly better gaming performance on the Spark 10 Pro.
Battery Life
The Spark 10 Pro shines in the battery department, boasting an endurance rating of 131 hours. This is a significant advantage over the Camon 19, which likely offers a shorter battery life. Both phones utilize 18W wired charging, so charging times will be comparable.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Camon 19 is a good choice for users prioritizing a sleek design and a decent camera system. The Tecno Spark 10 Pro is ideal for those seeking long battery life, a vibrant display, and a bit more processing power for everyday tasks and light gaming.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ What is the difference between the Helio G85 and Helio G88 chipsets?
The Helio G88 generally offers slightly better GPU performance and efficiency compared to the Helio G85, resulting in smoother gaming and potentially longer battery life.
❓ Which phone is better for taking selfies?
The Tecno Camon 19 is often marketed with a focus on its selfie camera, so it may offer a higher resolution front-facing sensor and potentially better selfie quality. However, a direct comparison would require detailed camera specifications and testing.
