The Tecno Camon 19 and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G represent distinct approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 19 aims to deliver a compelling feature set at an aggressively low price point, while the Galaxy A53 5G prioritizes a more balanced experience with Samsung’s established brand recognition and software support. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing a smooth, reliable experience and strong brand support, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the better choice. Its Exynos 1280 chipset and brighter display offer a noticeable advantage in performance and usability, despite the Camon 19’s lower price.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.6 x 74.4 x 8.3 mm (6.56 x 2.93 x 0.33 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 198 g (6.98 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | - | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Eco Black, Sea Salt White, Digital Green | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | CI6n | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | - | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9)
GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19
- More affordable price point
- Potentially larger megapixel count in camera
- Decent battery endurance
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G85)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Likely lower display quality
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- More powerful chipset (Exynos 1280)
- Faster charging speed (25W)
- Brighter and higher-quality display
- Samsung’s software support and ecosystem
- Higher price tag
- May not offer significantly better camera performance in all scenarios
- Potential for software bloat (though improving)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, peaking at 830 nits, compared to the Tecno Camon 19 (brightness unspecified). This translates to superior visibility outdoors under direct sunlight. While the Camon 19’s display specs are limited in the provided data, the A53’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (nominal) suggests a vibrant and immersive viewing experience. The A53’s Super AMOLED panel likely offers better color accuracy and viewing angles than what is typically found in the Camon 19’s price bracket. The lack of refresh rate data for the Camon 19 suggests it likely operates at a standard 60Hz, while the A53 is known to support 120Hz, contributing to smoother scrolling and animations.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are marketed with a focus on photography and video, but the underlying hardware differs. The provided data doesn’t detail specific camera specs for either phone beyond ‘Photo / Video’ capabilities. However, given Tecno’s recent emphasis on high-resolution sensors, the Camon 19 may prioritize megapixel count. The Galaxy A53 5G likely benefits from Samsung’s established image processing algorithms and potentially optical image stabilization (OIS) on its main sensor, resulting in better low-light performance and sharper images. The absence of details on the Camon 19’s lens apertures makes it difficult to assess its low-light capabilities, but it’s likely to be less sophisticated than the A53.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G utilizes the Exynos 1280 (5nm), while the Tecno Camon 19 is powered by the MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 is significantly more efficient, leading to better performance and thermal management. The A53’s CPU configuration – 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 – provides a performance edge over the Camon 19’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. This means faster app loading times, smoother multitasking, and a more responsive overall experience on the A53. While both phones feature octa-core CPUs, the architectural advantages of the Exynos 1280 are substantial.
Battery Life
Both the Tecno Camon 19 and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G achieve an endurance rating of 113 hours, suggesting comparable overall battery life. However, the charging speeds differ: the A53 5G supports 25W wired charging, while the Camon 19 is limited to 18W. This means the A53 5G will likely charge significantly faster, reducing downtime. While the battery capacity isn’t specified for either device, the faster charging speed of the A53 5G provides a practical advantage for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 if you need a functional smartphone with a decent camera for basic social media use and are operating on a very tight budget. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you prefer a more refined user experience, better performance for gaming and multitasking, and the peace of mind that comes with Samsung’s software updates and wider ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1280 isn't a flagship-level chip, it's generally well-managed in the Galaxy A53 5G. Reports indicate moderate thermal throttling during extended gaming, but it's unlikely to cause significant performance drops or discomfort. The 5nm process helps with efficiency, mitigating overheating compared to older, larger node chipsets.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up photos?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on phones in this price range are limited in their usefulness. The low resolution results in images lacking detail and sharpness. They can be fun for experimentation, but don't expect professional-quality macro photography. The Galaxy A53 5G's image processing may slightly improve results, but it's still a significant compromise.
❓ Can the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G reliably maintain 60fps in demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Galaxy A53 5G can typically achieve 60fps in PUBG Mobile with medium graphics settings. However, pushing the settings to ‘Ultra’ may result in frame drops and stuttering. The Exynos 1280 is capable, but it’s not a dedicated gaming chipset, so some compromises are necessary for a smooth experience.
❓ How does the software experience differ between the Tecno Camon 19 and the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G?
Samsung’s One UI offers a more polished and feature-rich software experience compared to Tecno’s HiOS. Samsung provides longer software update support, ensuring your phone remains secure and receives new features for a longer period. HiOS, while improving, often includes more pre-installed bloatware and may have a less refined user interface.
