The Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a feature-rich experience without breaking the bank, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this goal – one prioritizing fast charging and a more modern chipset, the other focusing on display brightness and overall endurance.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing rapid replenishment, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the clear winner. Its 67W charging, capable of reaching 100% in just 42 minutes, significantly outperforms the Tecno’s 33W charging. However, the Camon 19 Pro offers slightly better battery endurance and a brighter display.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, January 26 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, February 18 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 74.6 x 8.6 mm (6.57 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x zoom
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 65 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian | Graphite Gray, Polar White, Atlantic Blue |
| Models | CI8, CI8n | 21091116I, 2201116SG |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 120.33 / $ 230.00 / £ 319.00 |
| SAR | - | 1.05 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 121h
|
Endurance rating 115h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1597:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-25.8 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 348546 (v9)
GeekBench: 1734 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 288914 (v8), 382902 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
- Longer battery endurance (121h)
- Brighter display in controlled tests (479 nits)
- Potentially lower price point
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G96)
- No 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster charging (67W)
- More efficient chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- 5G connectivity
- Brighter display in real-world use (746 nits)
- Slightly shorter battery endurance (115h)
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching a measured 746 nits compared to the Tecno Camon 19 Pro’s 479 nits. This translates to superior visibility under direct sunlight. While the Tecno advertises a 1597:1 contrast ratio, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (typical of AMOLED panels) likely delivers deeper blacks and a more vibrant image. Both displays are adequate, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G offers a more pleasant viewing experience in bright environments.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is lacking in the provided data. Assuming similar main sensor resolutions (a common trend in this segment), the image processing algorithms will be the deciding factor. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s Snapdragon ISP generally offers more sophisticated image processing capabilities. Without specific details on aperture and sensor size, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G likely holds an edge due to its more advanced chipset.
Performance
The chipset choice is a key differentiator. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Tecno Camon 19 Pro features the MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695, built on a smaller 6nm process, offers improved power efficiency and thermal management. While the Helio G96’s Cortex-A76 cores clock slightly higher (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Snapdragon), the architectural advantages of the Snapdragon 695, coupled with its Kryo 660 Gold cores, generally result in smoother performance, particularly in sustained workloads. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G also benefits from 5G connectivity, absent in the Camon 19 Pro.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 19 Pro edges out the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G in endurance, achieving a 121-hour rating versus 115 hours. However, this advantage is offset by the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G’s dramatically faster 67W charging. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G can reach 50% charge in just 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes, while the Tecno Camon 19 Pro takes 65 minutes to reach 100%. This difference in charging speed is a significant convenience factor for many users.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro if you prioritize maximizing screen-on time and value a brighter display for outdoor visibility. It’s ideal for users who don’t mind slower charging speeds and primarily use their phone for everyday tasks. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G if you need a phone that can quickly top up its battery, especially important for heavy users or those frequently on the move. The Snapdragon 695 also offers a more efficient 5G experience.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G96 in the Tecno Camon 19 Pro struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Genshin Impact?
The Helio G96 is a capable chipset for mid-range gaming, but it may require reduced graphics settings in demanding titles like PUBG or Genshin Impact to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G, with its more efficient architecture, is likely to offer a smoother gaming experience overall.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G compared to the 33W charging on the Tecno Camon 19 Pro in a typical use case?
The difference is substantial. The Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G can gain approximately 50% charge in just 15 minutes, while the Tecno Camon 19 Pro will take around 30-40 minutes to achieve the same. A full charge on the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G takes 42 minutes, compared to 65 minutes for the Tecno Camon 19 Pro. This is a significant time saving for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Is the lack of 5G on the Tecno Camon 19 Pro a significant drawback?
The impact of lacking 5G depends on your location and carrier. If 5G coverage is limited in your area, or you don't have a 5G data plan, it won't be a major issue. However, if you live in an area with widespread 5G availability and want to take advantage of faster data speeds, the Redmi Note 11 Pro 5G is the better choice.
