The Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. Both aim to deliver a balanced experience, but they take different approaches. The Camon 19 Pro focuses on a solid all-around package, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G prioritizes 5G connectivity and rapid charging. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device offers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing convenience, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G is the better choice. Its significantly faster 67W charging – reaching 100% in just 41 minutes – outweighs the Tecno Camon 19 Pro’s slightly longer battery endurance. While both offer similar overall performance, the Poco’s charging speed is a game-changer.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 74.6 x 8.6 mm (6.57 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x zoom
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 65 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | CI8, CI8n | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 121h
|
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1597:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 348546 (v9)
GeekBench: 1734 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
- Slightly longer battery endurance (121h)
- Competitive price point
- Decent display brightness (479 nits)
- Slower 33W charging
- Less efficient 12nm chipset
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Significantly faster 67W charging
- More efficient 6nm Snapdragon 695 chipset
- 5G connectivity
- Slightly lower battery endurance (119h)
- Contrast ratio specification is vague
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays with a focus on size, but differ in reported contrast. The Poco X4 Pro 5G boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely marketing for a VA panel), while the Tecno Camon 19 Pro measures 1597:1. The Tecno’s display is measured at 479 nits of peak brightness, a crucial metric for outdoor visibility. While the Poco’s brightness isn’t specified, users should expect similar performance given the segment. Both lack high refresh rate panels, which is a common omission in this price bracket.
Camera Comparison
Both phones list 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific details. Without sensor size or aperture information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the chipset difference suggests the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G may offer slightly better image signal processing (ISP) capabilities, potentially leading to improved image quality, especially in low-light conditions. The prevalence of 2MP macro lenses on both devices suggests they are largely marketing features and shouldn't be a primary consideration.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipset: the Tecno Camon 19 Pro utilizes the Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm), while the Poco X4 Pro 5G employs the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Snapdragon 695, built on a smaller 6nm process, offers improved power efficiency and potentially better sustained performance under load. The CPU configurations are similar – both are octa-core with a performance/efficiency core split – but the Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold cores clock slightly higher at 2.2 GHz versus the Helio G96’s 2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. This translates to a slight edge for the Poco in demanding tasks and gaming.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 19 Pro achieves an endurance rating of 121 hours, slightly exceeding the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 119 hours. However, this difference is overshadowed by the Poco’s dramatically faster charging. The Poco X4 Pro 5G supports 67W wired charging, reaching 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes, while the Tecno Camon 19 Pro takes 65 minutes to reach a full charge with its 33W charging. This charging speed disparity is a significant advantage for the Poco, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro if you prioritize maximizing battery life and are less concerned with ultra-fast charging. Its 121-hour endurance rating provides peace of mind for heavy users. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you value quick top-ups and 5G connectivity, and want a phone that can go from near-empty to fully charged in under an hour.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G struggle with graphically intensive games like Genshin Impact?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship chipset, it's capable of running Genshin Impact at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense combat scenarios. The 6nm process helps with thermal throttling, but sustained performance will be lower than on more powerful chips.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 33W charging on the Tecno Camon 19 Pro in real-world use?
The difference is substantial. The Poco X4 Pro 5G can gain a 70% charge in just 22 minutes, while the Tecno Camon 19 Pro takes significantly longer to reach even 50%. This means you can quickly top up the Poco during a short break, whereas the Tecno requires a more extended charging session.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G useful if I don't have 5G coverage in my area?
Even without 5G coverage, the Poco X4 Pro 5G will fall back to 4G LTE. The modem is more efficient than older 4G modems, potentially offering slightly improved battery life and connection stability even on 4G networks. It future-proofs the device for when 5G becomes more widely available.
