The Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Samsung Galaxy A53 5G represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take different approaches. The Camon 19 Pro prioritizes display brightness and endurance, while the Galaxy A53 5G focuses on a more refined software experience and a more powerful chipset.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user, the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G is the stronger overall choice. Its Exynos 1280 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost, and Samsung’s software support is more robust. However, users prioritizing maximum display brightness and potentially longer battery life may find the Tecno Camon 19 Pro a better fit.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 12, 14, 20, 29, 30, 38, 39, 40, 41, 46, 48, 66 - SM-A536U |
| 5G bands | - | 2, 5, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536U |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 48, 66, 77, 78, 260, 261 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - SM-A536V |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, March 17 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, March 24 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 74.6 x 8.6 mm (6.57 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) | 159.6 x 74.8 x 8.1 mm (6.28 x 2.94 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 189 g (6.67 oz) |
| | - | IP67 dust/water resistant (up to 1m for 30 min) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~405 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.5 inches, 102.0 cm2 (~85.4% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 800 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 12, up to 4 major Android upgrades, One UI 8 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7X", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
12 MP, f/2.2, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1.12µm
5 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x zoom
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60fps; gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.2, 26mm (wide), 1/2.8", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (market/region dependent) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 65 min | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian | Black, White, Blue, Peach |
| Models | CI8, CI8n | SM-A536B, SM-A536B/DS, SM-A536U, SM-A536U1, SM-A5360, SM-A536E, SM-A536E/DS, SM-A536V, SM-A536W, SM-A536N, SM-S536DL |
| Price | About 200 EUR | $ 151.42 / £ 185.00 / € 169.14 |
| SAR | - | 0.75 W/kg (head) 1.58 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.89 W/kg (head) 1.60 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 121h
|
Endurance rating 113h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1597:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.5 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 348546 (v9)
GeekBench: 1734 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 329802 (v8), 379313 (v9)
GeekBench: 1891 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 19fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
- Higher endurance rating (121h)
- Brighter display (479 nits)
- Faster charging (33W, 65 min)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G96)
- Likely inferior display technology (IPS vs AMOLED)
Samsung Galaxy A53 5G
- More powerful chipset (Exynos 1280)
- Brighter display (830 nits)
- Potentially better camera image processing
- Slower charging (25W)
- Lower endurance rating (113h)
Display Comparison
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G significantly outshines the Tecno Camon 19 Pro in display brightness, achieving a measured 830 nits compared to the Camon 19 Pro’s 479 nits. This difference is crucial for outdoor visibility. While the Camon 19 Pro boasts a 1597:1 contrast ratio, Samsung’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio (typically associated with AMOLED panels) delivers deeper blacks and more vibrant colors. The A53’s panel technology isn’t specified, but the contrast ratio suggests AMOLED, while the Camon 19 Pro likely uses an IPS LCD. This impacts viewing angles and color reproduction.
Camera Comparison
Both devices feature photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking. Without specifics, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, Samsung’s image processing algorithms are generally more refined, offering better dynamic range and color accuracy. The A53’s potential for better low-light performance is higher, assuming a larger sensor and wider aperture. The presence of Optical Image Stabilization (OIS) on the A53 (a common feature in Samsung’s A-series) would further enhance image quality, particularly in video recording.
Performance
The Samsung Galaxy A53 5G’s Exynos 1280 (5nm) chipset offers a clear advantage over the Tecno Camon 19 Pro’s MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The 5nm fabrication process of the Exynos 1280 results in improved power efficiency and thermal management, allowing for sustained performance during demanding tasks. The A53’s CPU, with its 2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, outperforms the Camon 19 Pro’s 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. While both phones feature 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 efficiency cores, the A53’s overall architecture provides a smoother experience for gaming and multitasking.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 19 Pro edges out the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G in endurance rating, achieving 121 hours versus 113 hours. This suggests better overall battery life, despite the A53 having a larger battery capacity (not specified in the data). The Camon 19 Pro’s 33W charging allows for a full charge in 65 minutes, while the A53 5G’s 25W charging is slower. The combination of a potentially more efficient chipset and optimized software contributes to the Camon 19 Pro’s longer endurance.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro if you frequently use your phone outdoors and need a display that remains visible in direct sunlight, or if maximizing battery life is paramount. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A53 5G if you value a smoother user experience, better app performance, and a more established brand with longer software update commitments.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Exynos 1280 in the Galaxy A53 5G overheat during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Exynos 1280 is a capable chipset, it can experience some thermal throttling during extended gaming. However, the 5nm process helps mitigate this compared to older, larger-node chipsets. Expect some performance dips after 30-45 minutes of intensive gaming, but it shouldn't be a dealbreaker for casual gamers.
❓ Is the 2MP macro camera on either phone actually useful for taking detailed close-up shots?
Generally, 2MP macro cameras on phones in this price range offer limited detail and image quality. They are often included for marketing purposes but rarely deliver truly impressive macro photography. Expect soft images and limited dynamic range.
❓ What kind of charging protocol does the Tecno Camon 19 Pro use, and is it compatible with Power Delivery (PD) chargers?
The Tecno Camon 19 Pro uses a proprietary 33W charging protocol. While it may work with some PD chargers, it's not guaranteed to reach the full 33W charging speed. Using the included charger is recommended for optimal charging performance.
❓ How does the software update policy differ between Tecno and Samsung?
Samsung provides a significantly more robust software update policy than Tecno. Samsung typically guarantees 3 years of OS updates and 4 years of security patches for its A-series devices, while Tecno’s update commitment is less predictable and often shorter. This is a key consideration for long-term usability and security.
