The Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Realme 9 Pro+ represent compelling options in the competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches. The Camon 19 Pro prioritizes battery endurance, while the Realme 9 Pro+ focuses on faster processing and charging speeds. This comparison dissects their key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Realme 9 Pro+ emerges as the stronger contender. Its Mediatek Dimensity 920 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Tecno’s Helio G96, and the 60W charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Camon 19 Pro boasts slightly better battery endurance, the Realme’s overall package offers a more refined and responsive experience.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 74.6 x 8.6 mm (6.57 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x zoom
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 65 min | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | CI8, CI8n | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 121h
|
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1597:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 348546 (v9)
GeekBench: 1734 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9)
GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
- Exceptional battery endurance (121h)
- More affordable price point (likely)
- Decent display contrast ratio (1597:1)
- Less powerful processor (Helio G96)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
Realme 9 Pro+
- Faster processor (Dimensity 920)
- Significantly faster charging (60W)
- Improved power efficiency
- Slightly lower battery endurance (117h)
- Potentially higher price
Display Comparison
Both phones feature displays geared towards media consumption, but differ in key specifications. The Realme 9 Pro+ boasts an 'Infinite' contrast ratio (likely a marketing term for a high-quality panel), while the Tecno Camon 19 Pro achieves a measured 1597:1 contrast ratio. The Tecno’s display reaches 479 nits of peak brightness, which is adequate for indoor use but may struggle in direct sunlight. While the Realme’s peak brightness isn’t specified, its panel quality likely offers superior viewing angles and color reproduction. The lack of LTPO technology on either device suggests neither offers adaptive refresh rates for power saving.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are advertised as having capable camera systems, but detailed sensor information is limited. Without specifics on sensor size or image processing algorithms, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Realme 9 Pro+’s chipset likely provides more processing power for image stabilization and computational photography features. The presence of OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on the Realme 9 Pro+ (based on market trends for this price point) would be a significant advantage for capturing sharp photos and stable videos, a feature likely absent on the Tecno. We can safely assume both phones include standard photo and video modes, but the Realme’s superior processing power will likely result in better image quality in challenging lighting conditions.
Performance
The core difference between these two phones lies in their chipsets. The Realme 9 Pro+ utilizes the Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm), featuring a more powerful octa-core CPU with 2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 cores, compared to the Tecno Camon 19 Pro’s Mediatek Helio G96 (12nm) with 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores. The 6nm process node of the Dimensity 920 translates to improved power efficiency and thermal management, meaning sustained performance during demanding tasks. The Realme’s CPU architecture, with Cortex-A78 cores, offers a significant performance advantage over the Cortex-A76 cores found in the Tecno, particularly in CPU-intensive applications.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 19 Pro boasts an endurance rating of 121 hours, indicating excellent battery life. The Realme 9 Pro+ achieves 117 hours, a slight reduction. However, this difference is offset by the Realme’s significantly faster 60W wired charging, achieving a full charge in 44 minutes (advertised), compared to the Tecno’s 33W charging which takes 65 minutes. This faster charging capability is a major convenience factor, allowing users to quickly top up their battery when needed. The Realme’s Dimensity 920’s improved power efficiency also contributes to mitigating the slightly smaller battery capacity.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro if you prioritize maximizing battery life and are less concerned with demanding gaming or intensive multitasking. Its 121-hour endurance rating is ideal for users who frequently travel or have limited access to charging. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you value faster performance, quicker charging, and a more responsive user experience. This phone is better suited for gamers, content creators, and those who demand snappy performance from their device.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Mediatek Dimensity 920 in the Realme 9 Pro+ get hot during prolonged gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 920’s 6nm process node and efficient thermal design generally prevent significant overheating. While some warmth is expected during extended gaming, it’s unlikely to cause substantial performance throttling, offering a smoother gaming experience compared to the Tecno’s Helio G96.
❓ Is the 33W charging on the Tecno Camon 19 Pro slow compared to the 60W on the Realme 9 Pro+?
Yes, the 33W charging is noticeably slower. The Realme 9 Pro+ can fully charge in approximately 44 minutes, while the Tecno Camon 19 Pro takes around 65 minutes. This difference is significant for users who frequently need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ How does the Helio G96 perform with graphically demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Helio G96 can run PUBG Mobile, but you may need to lower graphics settings to maintain a stable frame rate. The Realme 9 Pro+’s Dimensity 920 offers a smoother experience at higher settings, providing a more immersive gaming experience.
❓ Are there any significant differences in the software experience between these two phones?
Both phones run Android-based operating systems with custom UIs. Realme UI is generally considered cleaner and more refined than Tecno’s HiOS, offering a smoother and more intuitive user experience. However, software preferences are subjective.
