The Tecno Camon 19 Pro and Motorola Edge 30 Neo represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 19 Pro prioritizes endurance and a high-contrast display, while the Edge 30 Neo focuses on 5G connectivity and faster charging, creating a clear divergence in priorities for potential buyers.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For users prioritizing all-day battery life and a high-contrast viewing experience, the Tecno Camon 19 Pro is the better choice. However, the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s significantly faster 68W charging and 5G capabilities make it ideal for those who value convenience and future-proofing.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 25, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 42, 43 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, September 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, October 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic back, plastic frame | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 166.8 x 74.6 x 8.6 mm (6.57 x 2.94 x 0.34 in) | 152.9 x 71.2 x 7.8 mm (6.02 x 2.80 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 204 g (7.20 oz) | 155 g (5.47 oz) |
| | - | Splash and dust resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~419 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.28 inches, 95.2 cm2 (~87.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | P-OLED, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 12, planned upgrade to Android 15 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | No | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Dual | - | 64 MP, f/1.8, (wide), 1/1.97", 0.7µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/3.0", 1.12µm, AF |
| Features | Laser AF, Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
50 MP, f/2.0, 50mm (telephoto), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, 2x zoom
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 1080p@30/60/120fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.4, 26mm (wide), 1/3.4", 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, (wide), 1/3.0", 0.7µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE, aptX HD, aptX Adaptive |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 3.1, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 65 min | 68W wired
5W wireless |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4020 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Polar Blue, Eco Black, Mondrian | Very Peri, Black Onyx, Ice Palace, Aqua Foam |
| Models | CI8, CI8n | XT2245-1 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | € 156.44 / $ 185.00 / £ 229.00 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 121h
|
Endurance rating 104h
|
| Camera |
Photo / Video |
Photo / Video |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: 1597:1 (nominal) |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker |
-28.7 LUFS (Average)
|
-26.4 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 348546 (v9)
GeekBench: 1734 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 11fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
AnTuTu: 380818 (v9)
GeekBench: 1964 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19 Pro
- Exceptional battery life (121h endurance)
- High contrast ratio for vibrant visuals
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Lower peak display brightness
- Less efficient chipset (Helio G96)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
Motorola Edge 30 Neo
- Significantly brighter display (1004 nits)
- Faster charging (68W wired, 5W wireless)
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- Shorter battery life (104h endurance)
- Less efficient contrast ratio
- Potentially higher price point
Display Comparison
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo boasts a significantly brighter display, reaching 1004 nits compared to the Tecno Camon 19 Pro’s 479 nits. This brightness advantage will be noticeable outdoors under direct sunlight. However, the Camon 19 Pro counters with a 1597:1 contrast ratio, suggesting deeper blacks and a more vibrant image, particularly for HDR content. The Edge 30 Neo’s ‘Infinite’ contrast ratio is a marketing term and doesn’t provide a quantifiable advantage. Both phones lack information regarding panel technology (OLED vs LCD) or refresh rates, but the brightness difference is a clear win for the Motorola.
Camera Comparison
Both devices are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but lack specific details regarding sensor size, aperture, or image stabilization. Without this information, a direct comparison is difficult. However, the market segment suggests the Edge 30 Neo may benefit from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP) for improved image processing. The absence of details regarding the main sensor resolution or features like OIS makes it impossible to definitively declare a winner. We can assume both phones will include standard features like portrait mode and night mode, but the quality will depend heavily on the underlying hardware.
Performance
The Motorola Edge 30 Neo utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Tecno Camon 19 Pro features the MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695, built on a more efficient 6nm process, generally offers better power efficiency and sustained performance compared to the 12nm Helio G96. While both CPUs feature octa-core configurations, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores operate at a slightly higher clock speed (2.2 GHz vs 2.05 GHz). This translates to a smoother experience in demanding applications and potentially better gaming performance on the Motorola, despite the Camon 19 Pro’s potentially larger RAM configurations (not specified in the data).
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 19 Pro achieves an endurance rating of 121 hours, significantly exceeding the Motorola Edge 30 Neo’s 104 hours. This suggests the Camon 19 Pro offers superior battery life in typical usage scenarios. However, the Edge 30 Neo compensates with much faster charging: 68W wired and 5W wireless, capable of reaching 100% in a claimed 65 minutes for the Camon 19 Pro versus an unspecified time for the Motorola. The Edge 30 Neo’s wireless charging capability is also a notable advantage. The Camon 19 Pro’s longer endurance is valuable, but the Edge 30 Neo’s rapid charging mitigates the battery life difference for users who can easily top up their phone throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Pro if you need exceptional battery life and a display with strong contrast for media consumption. This phone is geared towards users who don't mind slightly slower charging in exchange for extended usage. Buy the Motorola Edge 30 Neo if you prefer faster charging speeds, 5G connectivity for future network compatibility, and a brighter display for outdoor visibility, even if it means slightly less endurance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G96 in the Camon 19 Pro struggle with demanding games like Genshin Impact?
The Helio G96 is a capable chipset for mid-range gaming, but it may require reduced graphics settings in graphically intensive titles like Genshin Impact to maintain a stable frame rate. The Snapdragon 695 in the Edge 30 Neo, with its more efficient architecture, is likely to offer a smoother experience in these scenarios.
❓ How much faster is the 68W charging on the Motorola Edge 30 Neo compared to the 33W charging on the Tecno Camon 19 Pro in real-world use?
The 68W charging on the Edge 30 Neo will significantly reduce charging times. While the Camon 19 Pro takes 65 minutes to reach 100%, the Edge 30 Neo is expected to charge much faster, potentially reaching full charge in under an hour, offering a substantial convenience factor for users who frequently need to top up their battery.
❓ Is the lack of OIS on either phone a significant drawback for video recording?
Without Optical Image Stabilization (OIS), video recording can be noticeably shakier, especially when moving. While both phones likely employ Electronic Image Stabilization (EIS), it's generally less effective than OIS. Users prioritizing smooth video recording should consider this limitation.
