The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and two contenders vying for your attention are the Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro. Both offer compelling features at accessible prices, but which one truly comes out on top? Let's dive into a detailed comparison to help you decide.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro edges out the Camon 19 Pro 5G thanks to its superior charging speed, brighter display, and slightly more powerful chipset. However, the Camon 19 Pro 5G offers a competitive price and a sleek design, making it a viable option for budget-conscious buyers.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | SA/NSA | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE, 5G | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 38, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - China |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, October 27 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July 13 | Available. Released 2022, November 01 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 166.7 x 74.3 x 8.6 mm (6.56 x 2.93 x 0.34 in) | 163 x 76 x 8 mm (6.42 x 2.99 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 187 g (6.60 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~88.7% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.7% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz | AMOLED, 1B colors, 120Hz, Dolby Vision, HDR10+, 500 nits (typ), 900 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.6 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek Dimensity 810 (6 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 1080 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 12, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 12GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Dual-LED dual-tone flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), 1/1.7", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 50 MP, f/1.9, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 120˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps, HDR | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, 720p@960fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | HDR | HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/60fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1), GLONASS (G1), BDS (B1I+B1c), GALILEO (E1), QZSS (L1) |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 100% in 65 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 46 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Eco Black, Cedar Green | Frosted Blue (Sky Blue), Onyx Black (Midnight Black), Polar White, Stardust Purple |
| Models | CI7n | 22101316C, 22101316I, 23013RK75C, 22101316G |
| Price | - | € 148.54 / $ 142.17 / £ 149.99 / ₹ 19,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.09 W/kg (head) 1.06 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.99 W/kg (head) 0.99 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 97h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.6 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 490526 (v9)
GeekBench: 2209 (v5.1), 2372 (v6)
GFXBench: 22fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G
- Stylish Design
- 5G Connectivity
- Competitive Price
- Decent Front Camera
- Slower Charging
- Less Powerful Chipset
- Lower Display Brightness
Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro
- Fast Charging (67W)
- Bright and Vibrant Display
- More Powerful Chipset (Dimensity 1080)
- Excellent Battery Life
- Design may be less distinctive
- Potential software bloat (Xiaomi MIUI)
Display Comparison
The Redmi Note 12 Pro boasts a significant advantage with its 890 nits max brightness, offering better visibility in direct sunlight. Its contrast ratio, while nominally infinite, suggests excellent image quality. The Camon 19 Pro 5G's display is respectable but lacks the same level of brightness and contrast. Expect more vibrant colors and deeper blacks on the Redmi Note 12 Pro.
Camera Comparison
Both phones offer capable camera systems, but the Redmi Note 12 Pro likely has a slight edge in image quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. The Camon 19 Pro 5G often focuses on selfie capabilities, potentially offering enhanced front-facing camera features. Detailed camera testing would be needed for a definitive verdict.
Performance
The Redmi Note 12 Pro's Dimensity 1080 chipset provides a noticeable performance boost over the Camon 19 Pro 5G's Dimensity 810. While both are capable of handling everyday tasks, the Redmi Note 12 Pro will excel in gaming and demanding applications. Expect smoother multitasking and faster app loading times.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 12 Pro shines with its exceptional battery life, boasting an endurance rating of 97 hours and active use lasting over 12 hours. Its 67W charging is incredibly fast, reaching 50% in just 15 minutes. The Camon 19 Pro 5G's 33W charging is decent, but significantly slower.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Camon 19 Pro 5G is ideal for users prioritizing a stylish design and 5G connectivity on a tighter budget. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is a better choice for those who value fast charging, a vibrant display, and a more powerful processor for smoother performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Which phone is better for gaming?
The Xiaomi Redmi Note 12 Pro is the better choice for gaming due to its more powerful Dimensity 1080 chipset.
❓ How long does it take to fully charge each phone?
The Redmi Note 12 Pro takes approximately 46 minutes to fully charge with its 67W charger, while the Camon 19 Pro 5G takes around 65 minutes with its 33W charger.
