The Tecno Camon 19 Neo and Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive sub-$300 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver 5G connectivity and a feature-rich experience, they diverge significantly in their core hardware choices, particularly in chipset and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and a more efficient processor, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) is the clear winner. Its 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a more refined experience than the Helio G85, despite a similar core count. However, the Camon 19 Neo remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A (CA), 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Hybrid Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | - | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Eco Black, Ice Mirror, Dreamland Green | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | CH6i | 2201116SI |
| Price | - | About 250 EUR |
Tecno Camon 19 Neo
- More affordable price point
- Functional 5G connectivity
- Decent performance for basic tasks
- Slow 18W charging
- Less efficient Helio G85 chipset
- Potentially lower image quality
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Ultra-fast 67W charging
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Superior image processing capabilities
- Higher price tag
- May not justify the price increase for basic users
- Potential for software bloat (Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a flagship-level display, but differences exist. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (data not provided), the focus here is on performance. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G benefits from the more efficient Snapdragon 695, potentially allowing for slightly better sustained brightness and color accuracy. The absence of high refresh rate information for the Camon 19 Neo puts it at a disadvantage, as the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is likely to offer a smoother visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. However, the Snapdragon 695’s superior ISP suggests better image processing capabilities for the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is likely to handle low-light photography and video recording with more detail and less noise. The Helio G85, while capable, will likely struggle in challenging lighting conditions. The absence of OIS information for both devices means image stabilization will rely heavily on software algorithms.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 (6nm) is built on a smaller fabrication process than the Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). This 6nm process translates to significantly improved power efficiency and thermal management. While both are octa-core CPUs, the Snapdragon 695’s Kryo 660 Gold cores, clocked at 2.2 GHz, offer a performance edge over the Helio G85’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This means faster app loading times and smoother multitasking on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G is also likely to benefit from more advanced ISP (Image Signal Processor) capabilities within the Snapdragon 695.
Battery Life
The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G’s 67W charging is a game-changer. Advertised figures claim a 50% charge in 15 minutes and a full charge in 42 minutes. This drastically reduces downtime compared to the Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s 18W charging. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the efficiency gains of the Snapdragon 695 will likely offset any potential capacity difference, resulting in comparable real-world battery life despite the faster charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Neo if you need a functional 5G smartphone with a decent display and are extremely budget-conscious, willing to trade off charging speed and processing efficiency. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you prioritize rapid charging, smoother multitasking, and a more future-proof chipset, even if it means spending a bit more upfront.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G get hot during extended gaming sessions?
The Snapdragon 695 is known for its relatively good thermal efficiency thanks to its 6nm process. While it will get warm during prolonged gaming, it's less prone to significant throttling compared to the Helio G85 in the Camon 19 Neo, which operates on a less efficient 12nm process. Expect playable frame rates for longer periods on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Tecno Camon 19 Neo slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
Yes, 18W charging is considerably slower than the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G. Expect to spend several hours fully charging the Camon 19 Neo, which can be a significant drawback for users who rely heavily on their phones throughout the day. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can reach 100% in under an hour, while the Camon 19 Neo will likely take over 2.5 hours.
❓ Will I notice a significant performance difference between the Helio G85 and Snapdragon 695 in everyday tasks like browsing and social media?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the performance difference will be noticeable but not dramatic. However, the Snapdragon 695 will handle multitasking and more demanding apps with greater ease and responsiveness. The 6nm process and more powerful cores contribute to a smoother overall user experience.
