The Tecno Camon 19 Neo and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G represent compelling options in the sub-$200 smartphone market. While both aim to deliver essential features at an accessible price, they diverge significantly in their core hardware, particularly in chipset and connectivity. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device offers the best value for your money.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing 5G connectivity and faster charging, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 695 chipset, while not a powerhouse, offers a more efficient and future-proof experience than the Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s Helio G85. However, the Camon 19 Neo remains a viable option for those on a tighter budget and without immediate 5G needs.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 20, 26, 28, 32, 38, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA/Sub6 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 2, 5, 30, 66, 77 SA/NSA/Sub6/mmWave - USA |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, August 05 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July | Available. Released 2022, September 02 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 165.4 x 76.9 x 8.4 mm (6.51 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 197 g (6.95 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2408 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~400 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 104.9 cm2 (~82.5% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | PLS LCD, 120Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 14, One UI 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 64GB 4GB RAM, 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Quad | - | 50 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.76", 0.64µm, PDAF, OIS
5 MP, f/2.2, 13mm, 123˚ (ultrawide), 1/5.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | 8 MP, f/2.0, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - USA
8 MP, f/2.2, 25mm (wide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm - International |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, GALILEO, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio (market/region dependent) |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0 |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, compass, barometer (USA only) |
| | - | Virtual proximity sensing |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 25W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Eco Black, Ice Mirror, Dreamland Green | Black, White, Peach, Blue |
| Models | CH6i | SM-A236U, SM-A236U1, SM-A236B, SM-A236B/DS, SM-A236B/DSN, SM-A236E, SM-S236DL |
| Price | - | $ 84.44 / £ 129.00 / € 125.28 / ₹ 21,000 |
| SAR | - | 0.68 W/kg (head) 0.57 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 1.49 W/kg (head) 1.25 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 138h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: 1328:1 (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.9 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 318821 (v9)
GeekBench: 1940 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19 Neo
- Potentially lower price point
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Decent endurance rating
- Less efficient Helio G85 chipset
- Slower 18W charging
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Samsung Galaxy A23 5G
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- More efficient Snapdragon 695 chipset
- Faster 25W wired charging
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar endurance rating to the Camon 19 Neo
- LCD display, not AMOLED
Display Comparison
Both the Tecno Camon 19 Neo and Samsung Galaxy A23 5G share a similar contrast ratio of 1328:1, suggesting comparable color reproduction. However, the Galaxy A23 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 508 nits, which will translate to better visibility in direct sunlight compared to the Camon 19 Neo, whose brightness is not specified. While both likely utilize LCD panels, Samsung’s display calibration typically offers more accurate color profiles, enhancing the viewing experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are listed as having Photo/Video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is lacking for the Tecno Camon 19 Neo. The Samsung Galaxy A23 5G’s camera performance will likely be more consistent due to Samsung’s established image processing algorithms. While both may include lower-resolution auxiliary lenses, focusing on the main sensor is crucial. Without specific details on the Camon 19 Neo’s main sensor, it’s difficult to assess its low-light performance or dynamic range compared to the A23 5G.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets: the Tecno Camon 19 Neo utilizes the Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm), while the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G features the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm). The Snapdragon 695’s smaller 6nm process node provides a significant efficiency advantage, leading to better thermal management and potentially longer sustained performance. The CPU architecture also favors the A23 5G, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores versus the Camon 19 Neo’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This translates to snappier app launches and smoother multitasking on the Samsung device. The inclusion of 5G connectivity on the A23 5G is a key differentiator, offering future-proofed data speeds.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 138 hours, indicating similar overall battery life. However, the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G’s 25W wired charging significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s 18W charging. This means the A23 5G can replenish its battery much faster, minimizing downtime. While battery capacity isn’t specified, the efficiency gains of the Snapdragon 695 likely contribute to comparable endurance despite potentially having a smaller battery cell.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Neo if you need a functional smartphone for basic tasks like calling, texting, and social media, and 5G isn't a priority. Its lower price point makes it ideal for first-time smartphone users or as a reliable backup device. Buy the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G if you want a phone with 5G connectivity for faster data speeds, quicker app downloads, and smoother streaming, alongside the convenience of 25W fast charging for reduced downtime.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Galaxy A23 5G struggle with demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
While the Snapdragon 695 isn't a flagship-level processor, it's capable of running PUBG and Call of Duty Mobile at medium settings with reasonable frame rates. Expect some frame drops during intense action, but it's generally playable. The 6nm process helps mitigate thermal throttling, allowing for more sustained performance than the Helio G85.
❓ Is the 138-hour endurance rating accurate for real-world usage on the Samsung Galaxy A23 5G with 5G enabled?
The 138-hour endurance rating is based on a mixed usage profile. Enabling 5G will consume more battery power, reducing the actual usage time. However, the Snapdragon 695's efficiency helps offset some of this drain, and you can still expect all-day battery life with moderate 5G usage. Adjusting settings like screen brightness and refresh rate can further optimize battery life.
❓ How does the camera performance of the Tecno Camon 19 Neo compare to other phones in its price range?
Without detailed sensor specifications, it's difficult to provide a precise comparison. However, Tecno typically focuses on camera features like AI scene detection and beauty modes. Expect decent image quality in good lighting conditions, but low-light performance may be limited compared to phones with larger sensors and optical image stabilization.
