The mid-range smartphone market is fiercely competitive, and the Tecno Camon 19 Neo and Realme 9 Pro+ represent compelling options for budget-conscious buyers. While both aim to deliver a solid smartphone experience, they take distinctly different approaches. The Camon 19 Neo focuses on providing a capable gaming experience at an accessible price point, while the Realme 9 Pro+ prioritizes performance and rapid charging, positioning itself as a more premium offering.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing overall performance and convenience, the Realme 9 Pro+ is the clear winner. Its Dimensity 920 chipset and 60W charging significantly outperform the Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s Helio G85 and 18W charging. However, the Camon 19 Neo remains a strong contender for gamers on a tight budget.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 - SIM 1 & SIM 2 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - International |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE-A, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 28, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, February 16 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July | Available. Released 2022, February 21 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 160.2 x 73.3 x 8 mm (6.31 x 2.89 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Dual SIM (Nano-SIM, dual stand-by) |
| Weight | - | 182 g (6.42 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~84.2% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | Super AMOLED, 90Hz, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.5 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 12, upgradable to Android 13, Realme UI 4.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | No |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 50 MP, f/1.8, 24mm (wide), 1/1.56", 1.0µm, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP, f/2.4, (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | 16 MP, f/2.4, 27mm (wide), 1/3.09", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | - |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 60W wired, PD3.0, 100% in 44 min (advertised) |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Eco Black, Ice Mirror, Dreamland Green | Midnight Black, Aurora Green, Sunrise Blue, Free Fire Limited Edition |
| Models | CH6i | RMX3392, RMX3393 |
| Price | - | € 289.90 / $ 390.00 / ₹ 25,999 |
| SAR | - | 1.19 W/kg (head) 0.73 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 117h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-25.3 LUFS (Very good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 495096 (v8), 416031 (v9)
GeekBench: 2335 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 27fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19 Neo
- More affordable price point
- Efficient Helio G85 chipset for casual gaming
- Decent battery life for everyday use
- Slow 18W charging
- Less powerful processor compared to the Realme 9 Pro+
- Likely inferior camera performance
Realme 9 Pro+
- Significantly faster 60W charging
- Powerful Dimensity 920 processor for demanding tasks
- Likely superior camera system
- Longer battery endurance rating
- Higher price tag
- Potentially more heat generation under heavy load (though the 6nm process helps)
Display Comparison
The provided data lacks detailed display specifications for either device. However, Realme typically equips its 'Pro+' models with high-quality displays. The Realme 9 Pro+'s advertised 'Infinite' contrast ratio suggests a VA-type panel, potentially offering deeper blacks than the Camon 19 Neo. Given Tecno’s positioning, the Camon 19 Neo likely utilizes an IPS LCD. Without knowing the peak brightness or resolution, it’s difficult to definitively declare a winner, but the Realme likely offers a more visually immersive experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specifications beyond the mention of 'Photo/Video', a direct comparison is limited. However, the Realme 9 Pro+ is likely to feature a more sophisticated camera system. Realme often prioritizes camera technology in its 'Pro+' line. The absence of sensor size or aperture information for either device makes a precise assessment impossible. It's reasonable to assume the Realme 9 Pro+ will offer better low-light performance and more detailed images due to its likely superior image signal processor (ISP) integrated within the Dimensity 920 chipset. The Tecno Camon 19 Neo will likely focus on providing acceptable image quality for social media sharing.
Performance
The performance gap between these two devices is substantial. The Realme 9 Pro+’s Mediatek Dimensity 920 (6nm) is a significant upgrade over the Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s Mediatek Helio G85 (12nm). The Dimensity 920 features more powerful Cortex-A78 cores clocked at 2.5 GHz, compared to the Camon 19 Neo’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. The smaller 6nm process node of the Dimensity 920 also translates to improved power efficiency and reduced thermal throttling during sustained workloads. This means the Realme 9 Pro+ will handle demanding games and applications with greater ease and maintain higher frame rates for longer periods. The Helio G85 is still capable, but geared towards less intensive tasks.
Battery Life
The Realme 9 Pro+ boasts a significant advantage in charging speed with its 60W wired charging, capable of a full charge in a claimed 44 minutes. The Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s 18W charging is considerably slower. While the Realme 9 Pro+’s battery capacity isn’t specified, the faster charging mitigates concerns about a potentially smaller battery. The Realme 9 Pro+’s endurance rating of 117 hours suggests efficient power management alongside its fast charging capabilities. The Tecno Camon 19 Neo will require significantly longer to fully recharge, impacting user convenience.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Neo if you need a reliable and affordable smartphone primarily for casual gaming and everyday tasks, and aren't concerned with the fastest charging speeds. Buy the Realme 9 Pro+ if you prefer a more powerful processor for demanding apps and games, and value the convenience of incredibly fast 60W charging, even at a slightly higher price.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Dimensity 920 in the Realme 9 Pro+ prone to overheating during prolonged gaming sessions?
While the Dimensity 920 is a powerful chip, Mediatek has made significant strides in thermal management. The 6nm process node helps to dissipate heat more efficiently than older nodes. However, sustained gaming will inevitably generate heat. Realme likely incorporates cooling solutions (like vapor chamber cooling) to mitigate throttling, but performance may still decrease slightly after extended play.
❓ Does the Tecno Camon 19 Neo support any form of fast charging, or is 18W its only option?
The provided specifications confirm only 18W wired charging for the Tecno Camon 19 Neo. It does not appear to support any faster charging protocols. This means a full charge will take considerably longer compared to the Realme 9 Pro+, potentially requiring several hours.
❓ How does the Helio G85 in the Tecno Camon 19 Neo perform with popular games like PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile?
The Helio G85 can handle PUBG Mobile and Call of Duty Mobile, but you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to medium or low to achieve a consistently smooth frame rate. Expect some occasional frame drops during intense action. It's suitable for casual gaming, but not ideal for competitive players seeking the highest possible performance.
❓ Is the Realme 9 Pro+ a good choice for users who frequently record videos?
The Realme 9 Pro+ is a strong contender for video recording. The Dimensity 920's ISP supports advanced video codecs and features. While specific video recording capabilities (resolution, frame rates, stabilization) aren't detailed, Realme typically prioritizes video quality in its 'Pro+' models, making it a good choice for users who frequently record videos.
