The Tecno Camon 19 Neo and Oppo Reno7 5G represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they diverge significantly in their core strengths – the Camon 19 Neo prioritizes affordability, while the Reno7 5G focuses on faster charging and a more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects these differences to determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing speed and convenience, the Oppo Reno7 5G is the better choice. Its Mediatek Dimensity 900 chipset offers a noticeable performance uplift over the Camon 19 Neo’s Helio G85, and the 65W charging dramatically reduces downtime. However, budget-conscious users may find the Camon 19 Neo a viable alternative.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 66, 77, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2022, June 15 | 2022, February 04 |
| Status | Available. Released 2022, July | Available. Released 2022, February 17 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168.8 x 76.9 x 8.5 mm (6.65 x 3.03 x 0.33 in) | 160.6 x 73.2 x 7.8 mm (6.32 x 2.88 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 173 g (6.10 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~409 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.6% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.43 inches, 99.8 cm2 (~84.9% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD | AMOLED, 90Hz, HDR10+, 430 nits (typ), 600 nits (HBM), 800 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.4 GHz Cortex-A78 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek Dimensity 900 (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G68 MC4 |
| OS | Android 12, HIOS 8.6 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 13, ColorOS 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC |
| Internal | 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF
Auxiliary lenses | 64 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 119˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, f/2.5, 26mm (wide), 0.8µm | 32 MP, f/2.4, 24mm (wide), 1/2.74", 0.8µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.2, A2DP, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac/6, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 65W wired, 100% in 31 min
Reverse wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Eco Black, Ice Mirror, Dreamland Green | Stary Black, Startrails Blue |
| Models | CH6i | CPH2371 |
| Price | - | $ 168.01 / ₹ 25,999 |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 123h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-29.4 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 407040 (v8), 479608 (v9)
GeekBench: 2276 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 20fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 19 Neo
- More affordable price point
- Acceptable battery endurance
- Functional for basic smartphone tasks
- Slower processor and graphics
- Significantly slower charging speed
- Likely inferior camera performance
Oppo Reno7 5G
- Faster and more efficient processor
- Ultra-fast 65W charging
- Potentially better camera quality
- Reverse wired charging capability
- Higher price tag
- Battery life is comparable, not superior, despite faster charging
Display Comparison
The Oppo Reno7 5G boasts a measured peak brightness of 635 nits, suggesting a significantly more visible display in outdoor conditions compared to the Tecno Camon 19 Neo, for which brightness data is unavailable. While both likely utilize IPS LCD panels (given the price points), the Reno7 5G’s higher brightness and infinite contrast ratio (nominal) indicate a more vibrant and engaging viewing experience. Bezels are likely comparable, but the Reno7 5G’s overall display quality is expected to be superior.
Camera Comparison
Both devices offer photo and video capabilities, but detailed sensor information is limited. The Reno7 5G likely benefits from Oppo’s established image processing algorithms, potentially delivering more refined images. Without specific sensor size or aperture data for either device, it’s difficult to make a definitive judgment. However, the Reno7 5G’s brand positioning suggests a greater emphasis on camera quality, potentially including features like optical image stabilization (OIS) which is absent on the Camon 19 Neo. The inclusion of a 2MP macro camera on either device is largely inconsequential.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno7 5G’s Mediatek Dimensity 900, fabricated on a 6nm process, offers a substantial advantage over the Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s 12nm Mediatek Helio G85. The Dimensity 900’s Cortex-A78 cores (2x2.4 GHz) are architecturally superior to the Camon 19 Neo’s Cortex-A75 cores (2x2.0 GHz), resulting in faster application loading and smoother multitasking. The 6nm process also contributes to better thermal efficiency, potentially reducing throttling during sustained workloads. While both phones feature 6GB of RAM (assumed based on market segment), the Reno7 5G’s faster chipset will leverage it more effectively.
Battery Life
Both phones achieve an endurance rating of 123 hours, suggesting similar overall battery life despite the Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s unspecified battery capacity. However, the charging experience is where the Reno7 5G truly shines. Its 65W wired charging can replenish the battery to 100% in just 31 minutes, a massive advantage over the Camon 19 Neo’s slower 18W charging. The Reno7 5G also supports reverse wired charging, adding further convenience for users who need to top up other devices.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 19 Neo if you need a functional smartphone for everyday tasks and prioritize maximizing value for your money. It’s ideal for users who don’t heavily game or require rapid charging. Buy the Oppo Reno7 5G if you prefer a smoother, more responsive experience, especially when multitasking or playing demanding games, and if minimizing charging time is a high priority. The Reno7 5G caters to users who demand a more premium feel and faster performance.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Mediatek Dimensity 900 in the Oppo Reno7 5G prone to overheating during extended gaming sessions?
The Dimensity 900, built on a 6nm process, is generally efficient and well-managed. While some heat generation is inevitable during demanding tasks like gaming, the Reno7 5G’s thermal design should prevent significant throttling, allowing for sustained performance. However, prolonged gaming at maximum settings will still result in some temperature increase.
❓ How much of a real-world difference will the 65W charging make on the Oppo Reno7 5G?
The 65W charging on the Reno7 5G is a game-changer. Going from 0% to 100% in just 31 minutes drastically reduces downtime compared to the Tecno Camon 19 Neo’s 18W charging. This is particularly beneficial for users who frequently find themselves needing to quickly top up their battery before heading out.
❓ Does the Tecno Camon 19 Neo support any form of fast charging, or is 18W its maximum?
The Tecno Camon 19 Neo is limited to 18W wired charging. While it's not exceptionally slow, it's considerably slower than the 65W charging offered by the Oppo Reno7 5G, requiring significantly more time to fully recharge the battery.
