The Tecno Camon 18T and Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G represent compelling options in the crowded budget smartphone market. The Camon 18T aims for a balanced experience, while the Poco X4 Pro 5G aggressively targets users prioritizing 5G connectivity and rapid charging. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G emerges as the stronger choice. Its Snapdragon 695 5G chipset, built on a more efficient 6nm process, offers a performance edge and future-proofs connectivity. Crucially, the 67W charging dramatically reduces downtime, a significant advantage over the Camon 18T’s 18W charging.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 - Global |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 17, 18, 19, 20, 26, 28, 38, 40, 41 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41, 77, 78 SA/NSA - Global |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA - India |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 30 | 2022, February 28 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 30 | Available. Released 2022, March 23 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back, plastic frame |
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 76.7 x 8.9 mm (6.65 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 205 g (7.23 oz) |
| | - | IP53, dust and splash resistant |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 500 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 for POCO |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 48 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF - Global version
64 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), 0.7µm, PDAF - India version
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 48 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | No | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 70% in 22 min, 100% in 41 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Iris purple, Dusk Gray, Ceramic White | Laser Black, Laser Blue, Poco Yellow |
| Models | - | 2201116PG |
| Price | About 150 EUR | € 160.40 / $ 419.99 / £ 255.00 / ₹ 12,940 |
| SAR | - | 1.06 W/kg (head) 1.09 W/kg (body) |
| SAR EU | - | 0.60 W/kg (head) 0.96 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 119h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-26.8 LUFS (Good)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 335353 (v8), 384646 (v9)
GeekBench: 2063 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 17fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 18T
- Balanced performance for everyday tasks
- Reliable battery endurance (119h)
- Potentially more affordable price point
- Slower 18W charging
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G85)
- Limited 5G capabilities
Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3
- More powerful and efficient Snapdragon 695 5G
- 5G connectivity for future-proofing
- May be slightly more expensive
- Similar battery endurance to the Camon 18T despite faster charging
- Potential for software bloat (typical of Xiaomi)
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' contrast ratio, a marketing term indicating a high-quality panel. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness and color gamut coverage are missing. Given Xiaomi’s typical display calibration, the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely offers a slightly more vibrant and accurate visual experience. Bezels are expected to be comparable, typical of this price segment. Without further data, it's difficult to definitively declare a winner.
Camera Comparison
Both phones feature 'Photo / Video' capabilities, but lack specific sensor details. Assuming typical configurations for this price range, the Poco X4 Pro 5G likely benefits from Qualcomm’s image signal processor (ISP), offering better noise reduction and dynamic range. The absence of information regarding sensor size and aperture makes a precise comparison impossible. We can assume both will include a standard array of lenses, but the image processing algorithms will likely differentiate the final results, favoring the Poco due to Qualcomm’s ISP.
Performance
The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm) holds a clear advantage over the Tecno Camon 18T’s MediaTek Helio G85 (12nm). The 6nm process translates to improved thermal efficiency and power consumption, meaning the Poco is less likely to throttle under sustained load. The Snapdragon 695’s CPU, with 2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold cores, outperforms the Camon 18T’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 cores. This difference will be noticeable in app loading times, multitasking, and gaming. While both have octa-core CPUs, the architectural improvements in the Snapdragon chipset are substantial.
Battery Life
Both devices boast an endurance rating of 119 hours, suggesting similar real-world battery life under moderate usage. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 67W charging, supporting PD3.0 and QC3, can reach 70% in 22 minutes and 100% in 41 minutes. The Tecno Camon 18T’s 18W charging is significantly slower, requiring considerably longer to fully replenish the battery. This charging speed disparity is a major differentiator, making the Poco far more convenient for users who frequently need to top up their device.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 18T if you prioritize a consistently smooth experience for everyday tasks and aren't heavily reliant on 5G or demanding mobile gaming. Buy the Xiaomi Poco X4 Pro 5G if you want faster 5G speeds, significantly quicker charging, and a chipset capable of handling more intensive applications and occasional gaming sessions.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Snapdragon 695 in the Poco X4 Pro 5G handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile?
The Snapdragon 695 is capable of running PUBG Mobile, but likely at medium settings to maintain a stable frame rate. It's not a dedicated gaming chipset, so don't expect flagship-level performance. The Helio G85 in the Camon 18T will struggle more with demanding titles.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Tecno Camon 18T?
The 67W charging on the Poco X4 Pro 5G is significantly faster. It can reach 100% charge in approximately 41 minutes, while the Tecno Camon 18T will take well over two hours to fully charge from 0%. This difference is crucial for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the 5G connectivity on the Poco X4 Pro 5G useful if 5G coverage is limited in my area?
Even with limited 5G coverage, the Poco X4 Pro 5G’s 5G modem offers future-proofing. It will automatically switch to 4G when 5G is unavailable, and as 5G networks expand, you’ll be ready to take advantage of the faster speeds.
❓ Are there significant software differences between Tecno's HiOS and Xiaomi's MIUI?
Yes. MIUI is known for its extensive customization options and features, but also for potential bloatware. HiOS is generally lighter and closer to stock Android, but may lack some of the advanced features found in MIUI. Preference here is subjective.
