Both the Tecno Camon 18i and the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC target the budget-conscious smartphone user, but they approach the segment with slightly different priorities. The Camon 18i focuses on providing a solid all-around experience, while the Note 10 Pro NFC emphasizes faster charging and a more capable chipset for demanding tasks. This comparison will dissect the key differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing performance and faster charging, the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC is the clear winner. Its Helio G95 chipset and 33W charging significantly outperform the Camon 18i’s Helio G85 and 18W charging, making it a better choice for gaming and users on the go.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, November 01 | 2021, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 01 | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 164.5 x 76.5 x 8.9 mm (6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 720 x 1640 pixels (~271 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.6 inches, 103.4 cm2 (~82.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | eMMC 5.1 | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, (wide), AF
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 16 MP, f/2.0 | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | 5.0, A2DP, LE | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | No | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | microUSB 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Deep Sea, Frost Silver, Tranquil Green | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret |
| Models | CG6 | X695C |
| Price | About 150 EUR | - |
Tecno Camon 18i
- More affordable price point
- Reliable performance for basic tasks
- Potentially longer battery life (depending on capacity)
- Slower charging speed (18W)
- Less powerful chipset (Helio G85)
Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC
- Faster charging (33W)
- More powerful chipset (Helio G95)
- Better gaming performance
- Slightly higher price
- Potentially shorter battery life (depending on capacity)
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. While specific panel details (like peak brightness in nits or color gamut coverage) are unavailable, both utilize 12nm chipsets suggesting similar power constraints impacting display capabilities. The focus here isn't on premium display features; it's on functional usability. Bezels are likely comparable given the price points, and color accuracy will likely be standard for this segment. The absence of high refresh rate panels on either device suggests a focus on battery life over visual fluidity.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed sensor information beyond the presence of a main camera, a direct comparison is limited. However, the chipset difference indirectly impacts camera performance. The G95’s more powerful ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Note 10 Pro NFC allows for faster image processing and potentially better low-light performance. The inclusion of features like Night Mode and HDR will likely be more effective on the Note 10 Pro NFC. The prevalence of 2MP macro and depth sensors on both devices suggests these are largely marketing features and won't significantly impact image quality. Focus should be on the main sensor's capabilities, which are currently unknown.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s MediaTek Helio G95 (12nm) is a step up from the Tecno Camon 18i’s Helio G85 (12nm). The G95 utilizes two Cortex-A76 cores clocked at 2.05 GHz, compared to the G85’s Cortex-A75 cores at 2.0 GHz. This architectural difference, combined with the slightly higher clock speed, translates to a noticeable performance advantage for the Note 10 Pro NFC in CPU-intensive tasks and gaming. The G95’s GPU is also more powerful, offering better graphics performance. While both phones likely feature similar RAM configurations, the G95’s superior processing power will minimize bottlenecks and provide a smoother overall experience.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified, but the charging wattage is a key differentiator. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s 33W wired charging is significantly faster than the Tecno Camon 18i’s 18W charging. This means the Note 10 Pro NFC can replenish its battery much quicker, reducing downtime. Even if the Camon 18i has a slightly larger battery capacity, the Note 10 Pro NFC’s faster charging will likely result in less perceived battery anxiety for users who frequently top up their phones throughout the day.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 18i if you need a reliable daily driver with a focus on affordability and don't heavily prioritize gaming or fast charging. Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC if you prefer a more responsive experience, faster charging speeds, and are willing to spend slightly more for improved performance, especially for gaming and multitasking.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC get noticeably hot during extended gaming sessions?
While the Helio G95 is more powerful, it's still a 12nm chip. Expect some heat generation during prolonged gaming, but the Note 10 Pro NFC likely has adequate thermal management to prevent significant throttling. The larger surface area of the device compared to some competitors may also aid in heat dissipation.
❓ Is the 18W charging on the Tecno Camon 18i slow enough to be a major inconvenience?
For casual users who charge their phones overnight, 18W charging is likely sufficient. However, if you frequently need to quickly top up your battery during the day, the slower charging speed will be noticeable and potentially frustrating compared to the 33W charging on the Note 10 Pro NFC.
❓ Can the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
The Helio G95 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings with reasonably smooth frame rates. However, achieving consistently high frame rates (60fps+) may require adjusting graphics settings depending on the specific device configuration and game version. Expect a better gaming experience overall compared to the Camon 18i.
❓ Are the 2MP macro and depth cameras on either phone worth using?
Generally, 2MP macro and depth cameras on phones in this price range offer limited utility. Image quality from the macro camera is often subpar, and the depth sensor's impact on portrait mode is often minimal. Don't base your purchasing decision on these cameras.
