The Tecno Camon series is known for offering impressive features at competitive prices. The Camon 18 and Camon 17 are two popular contenders, but which one reigns supreme? This comprehensive comparison will delve into their key differences to help you make an informed decision.
🏆 Quick Verdict
The Camon 18 edges out the Camon 17 thanks to its slightly more powerful Helio G88 chipset, offering a modest performance boost. Both phones share similar battery and charging capabilities, making the G88 the deciding factor for those prioritizing a bit more processing power. Ultimately, the choice depends on your budget and performance needs.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | LTE |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 04 | 2021, May 08 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 23 | Available. Released 2021, May 22 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 164.5 x 76.5 x 9 mm (6.48 x 3.01 x 0.35 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 720 x 1600 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~266 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 105.2 cm2 (~83.6% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 550 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 450 nits (HBM) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6769Z Helio G85 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G52 MC2 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 | Android 11, HIOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | Unspecified |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR |
| Single | - | 16 MP |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, (wide), PDAF
Auxiliary lenses |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | Dual-LED flash |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | Yes |
| WLAN | Yes | Yes |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (rear-mounted), accelerometer, proximity |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 18W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dusk Gray, Ceramic White, Iris purple | Frost Sliver, Deep Sea, Tranquil Green |
| Models | CH6, CH6n | CG6, CG6j |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 160 EUR |
Tecno Camon 18
- Slightly better performance (Helio G88)
- Good battery life (5000mAh)
- Decent camera system
- 90Hz display
- 18W charging is relatively slow
- Plastic build quality
- IPS LCD display (not OLED)
Tecno Camon 17
- More affordable
- Good battery life (5000mAh)
- Decent camera system
- 90Hz display
- Slightly less powerful (Helio G85)
- 18W charging is relatively slow
- Plastic build quality
- IPS LCD display (not OLED)
Display Comparison
Both the Camon 18 and Camon 17 typically feature a 6.8-inch display with a 90Hz refresh rate, offering a smooth visual experience. While resolution might be similar (likely FHD+), panel technology (IPS LCD) is consistent across both models. Expect vibrant colors and decent viewing angles, though outdoor visibility might be a challenge in direct sunlight.
Camera Comparison
Both phones typically feature a quad-camera setup with a primary 48MP sensor. Expect similar image quality in well-lit conditions. The Camon 18 might have slightly improved image processing algorithms, potentially resulting in marginally better dynamic range and noise reduction. Both offer decent selfie cameras, likely around 16MP.
Performance
The Camon 18 boasts the Mediatek Helio G88, a step up from the Camon 17's Helio G85. While both are based on the 12nm process, the G88 generally offers slightly better CPU and GPU performance. This translates to smoother gameplay and quicker app loading times on the Camon 18. However, real-world differences might be subtle for casual users.
Battery Life
Both the Camon 18 and Camon 17 are equipped with a 5000mAh battery, providing all-day battery life for moderate usage. Charging speeds are identical at 18W wired, meaning a full charge will take roughly the same amount of time for both devices.
Buying Guide
The Tecno Camon 18 is ideal for users who want a slightly faster experience for gaming and multitasking. If you're on a tighter budget and primarily use your phone for everyday tasks like browsing and social media, the Camon 17 remains a solid choice. Both are great for photography enthusiasts.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Is the Tecno Camon 18 worth the extra money?
If you prioritize a slightly smoother performance for gaming or multitasking, the Camon 18's Helio G88 chipset makes it worth the upgrade. Otherwise, the Camon 17 offers excellent value for money.
❓ What is the camera quality like on both phones?
Both phones offer decent camera quality, particularly in well-lit conditions. Expect a 48MP main sensor and similar performance for everyday photography. Low-light performance is adequate but not exceptional.
