The Tecno Camon 18 and Oppo Reno 5G represent different approaches to the mid-range smartphone market. The Camon 18 focuses on affordability and accessibility, while the Reno 5G, though older, leverages a more powerful chipset from a previous generation. This comparison dissects their key differences to determine which device offers the best experience for your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing raw performance and future-proofing, the Oppo Reno 5G is the better choice. Its Snapdragon 855, built on a 7nm process, delivers significantly more processing power than the Camon 18’s Helio G88. However, the Camon 18 remains a compelling option for budget-conscious buyers who prioritize battery life and don't demand intensive gaming.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 800 / 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 12, 13, 17, 18, 19, 20, 25, 26, 28, 29, 32, 34, 38, 39, 40, 41, 66 - Global |
| 5G bands | - | 78 NSA/Sub6 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA 42.2/5.76 Mbps, LTE (5CA) Cat18 1200/150 Mbps, 5G (2+ Gbps DL) |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / CDMA / HSPA / EVDO / LTE / 5G |
| | - | CDMA2000 1xEV-DO |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 04 | 2019, April. Released 2019, May |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 23 | Discontinued |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 6), glass back (Gorilla Glass 5), aluminum frame |
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 162 x 77.2 x 9.3 mm (6.38 x 3.04 x 0.37 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | · Nano-SIM· Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 215 g (7.58 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 6 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2340 pixels, 19.5:9 ratio (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.6 inches, 108.6 cm2 (~86.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 550 nits (typ) | AMOLED |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (1x2.84 GHz Kryo 485 & 3x2.42 GHz Kryo 485 & 4x1.78 GHz Kryo 485) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM8150 Snapdragon 855 (7 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Adreno 640 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 | Android 9.0 (Pie), ColorOS 6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Laser AF, Dual-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | 48 MP, f/1.7, 26mm (wide), 1/2.0", 0.8µm, PDAF, OIS
13 MP, f/3.0, 130mm (periscope telephoto), 5x optical zoom, PDAF, OIS
8 MP, f/2.2, 16mm (ultrawide) |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30/60fps, 1080p@30/60/240fps, gyro-EIS; video rec. only with main camera |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | LED flash, HDR |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | Motorized pop-up 16 MP, f/2.0, 26mm (wide), 1/3.06", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | No |
| 35mm jack | Yes | No |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, EDR, LE, aptX HD |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS (L1+L5), GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO, QZSS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 20W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | Li-Po 4065 mAh, non-removable |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dusk Gray, Ceramic White, Iris purple | Ocean Green, Jet Black |
| Models | CH6, CH6n | CPH1921 |
| Price | About 170 EUR | About 880 EUR |
Tecno Camon 18
- More affordable price point
- Potentially longer battery life due to efficient chipset
- Sufficient for basic smartphone tasks
- Significantly weaker performance compared to the Reno 5G
- Less capable camera system
- Slower charging speed
Oppo Reno 5G
- Superior processing power with Snapdragon 855
- Better gaming performance
- Faster charging (20W)
- Higher price compared to the Camon 18
- Potentially shorter battery life under heavy load
- Older chipset, may not receive as many future updates
Display Comparison
Neither device's display specifications are provided, so a direct comparison is limited. However, given the Reno 5G's positioning as a mid-range device, it likely features a higher-quality AMOLED panel with better color accuracy and brightness compared to the Camon 18, which typically targets a more cost-sensitive market. The Reno 5G's potential for a higher refresh rate (though unconfirmed) would also contribute to a smoother visual experience.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs, a precise comparison is difficult. However, the Reno 5G’s flagship heritage suggests a more sophisticated image processing pipeline and potentially larger sensor sizes. While both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, the Reno 5G’s image quality will likely be superior in low-light conditions and offer more dynamic range. The Camon 18 will likely focus on providing acceptable image quality for social media sharing, but won't match the Reno 5G's capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Oppo Reno 5G’s Snapdragon 855 (7nm) is a flagship-level processor from 2019, boasting a Kryo 485 CPU configuration with a prime core clocked at 2.84 GHz. This contrasts sharply with the Tecno Camon 18’s MediaTek Helio G88 (12nm). The Snapdragon 855’s smaller fabrication process (7nm vs 12nm) translates to greater power efficiency and significantly higher sustained performance, especially in graphically intensive tasks. The Reno 5G will handle demanding games and multitasking with ease, while the Camon 18 will likely struggle with more complex applications. The Snapdragon 855 also benefits from a more powerful Adreno 640 GPU.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 18’s 18W charging is slower than the Oppo Reno 5G’s 20W charging. However, the Helio G88’s lower power consumption means the Camon 18 will likely achieve a longer battery life on a single charge. While the Reno 5G charges slightly faster, its more powerful processor will drain the battery more quickly during intensive use. The actual 0-100% charge times will depend on battery capacity (not provided), but the Camon 18 will likely offer more hours of usage between charges.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 18 if you need a reliable, affordable smartphone for everyday tasks like calling, texting, social media, and light web browsing, and battery life is paramount. Buy the Oppo Reno 5G if you prefer a smoother experience with demanding apps, enjoy mobile gaming, and value the benefits of a more powerful processor, even if it means slightly shorter battery life.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G88 in the Tecno Camon 18 struggle with popular games like PUBG Mobile?
Yes, the Helio G88 is a budget-oriented chipset. While it can run PUBG Mobile, you'll likely need to lower the graphics settings to achieve a playable frame rate. Expect occasional stuttering and reduced visual fidelity compared to the smoother experience offered by the Snapdragon 855 in the Oppo Reno 5G.
❓ Is the Snapdragon 855 in the Oppo Reno 5G still relevant in 2024, or is it showing its age?
While not the newest chipset, the Snapdragon 855 remains a capable performer for most tasks in 2024. It can handle demanding games and applications without issue. However, it's important to note that it's a few generations old and may not receive the same level of software support as newer processors.
❓ How much faster is the 20W charging on the Oppo Reno 5G compared to the 18W charging on the Tecno Camon 18?
The difference in charging speed will be noticeable, but not dramatic. Expect the Reno 5G to charge approximately 10-15% faster than the Camon 18, assuming both have similar battery capacities. The exact time difference will depend on the battery size and charging conditions.
❓ Does the Oppo Reno 5G support 5G connectivity, and will I be able to utilize it?
Yes, the Oppo Reno 5G is a 5G-enabled device. However, whether you can utilize 5G connectivity depends on your carrier and location. You'll need a 5G-compatible SIM card and be within a 5G coverage area to experience faster data speeds.
