Both the Tecno Camon 18 and the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC target the budget-conscious smartphone user, but they approach the segment with slightly different priorities. The Camon 18 leans towards a streamlined experience, while the Note 10 Pro NFC emphasizes faster charging and a slightly more powerful chipset. This comparison dissects the key differences to determine which device delivers the best value.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For most users, the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC is the better choice. Its Helio G95 chipset provides a noticeable performance edge over the Camon 18’s Helio G88, and the 33W fast charging significantly reduces downtime. While the Camon 18 is still a capable device, the Note 10 Pro NFC offers a more compelling overall package.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1700(AWS) / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 41, 40, 66 |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 7, 8, 20, 28 |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 04 | 2021, May 12 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, November 23 | Available. Released 2021, June 07 |
| Body |
|---|
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 172.8 x 78.3 x 7.8 mm (6.80 x 3.08 x 0.31 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | - |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~387 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.95 inches, 114.7 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 90Hz, 550 nits (typ) | IPS LCD, 90Hz |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 & 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6769H Helio G88 (12 nm) | Mediatek MT6785V/CD Helio G95 (12 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 | Mali-G76 MC4 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 | Android 11, XOS 7.6 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 4GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.2 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, panorama, HDR | Quad-LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 64 MP, f/1.9, (wide), 1/1.72", 0.8µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 120˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP, f/2.4, (monochrome)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | - | 16 MP, (wide) |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | - |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.0, (wide), 1/3.09" |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with dual speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS |
| Radio | FM radio | FM radio |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 18W wired | 33W wired |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dusk Gray, Ceramic White, Iris purple | Black, Purple, Nordic Secret |
| Models | CH6, CH6n | X695C |
| Price | About 170 EUR | - |
Tecno Camon 18
- Potentially more streamlined software experience.
- Efficient chipset for basic tasks.
- Likely more affordable.
- Slower charging speed (18W).
- Less powerful chipset for gaming and multitasking.
Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC
- Faster charging (33W).
- More powerful Helio G95 chipset.
- Better performance for gaming and demanding apps.
- May be slightly more expensive.
- Potentially more aggressive background app management.
Display Comparison
Neither device boasts a particularly standout display. Both likely utilize LCD panels, common in this price bracket. The focus here isn't on cutting-edge tech like LTPO or OLED. However, display quality will likely be similar, with the user experience dictated more by software calibration than inherent panel capabilities. Bezels are expected to be moderate on both, typical for the segment.
Camera Comparison
Without detailed camera specs beyond the chipsets, a direct comparison is limited. Both phones likely feature multi-camera setups, but the image processing capabilities will differ. Tecno often emphasizes camera features in its marketing, but the G95’s ISP (Image Signal Processor) in the Note 10 Pro NFC is likely more capable, resulting in better dynamic range and noise reduction. The presence of NFC in the Note 10 Pro suggests a slightly more feature-rich overall package, potentially extending to camera software features.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s Mediatek Helio G95 (12nm) represents a step up from the Tecno Camon 18’s Helio G88 (12nm). The G95 features a CPU configuration of 2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 cores and 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55 cores, compared to the G88’s 2x2.0 GHz Cortex-A75 and 6x1.8 GHz Cortex-A55. The Cortex-A76 cores in the G95 offer a performance advantage in single-core tasks and gaming. This translates to smoother multitasking and higher frame rates in demanding games. While both use the same 12nm process, the architectural improvements in the G95 provide a tangible benefit for power users.
Battery Life
The battery capacity is not specified, but both devices likely fall in the 5000mAh range, typical for this class. However, the charging speeds are drastically different. The Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC’s 33W wired charging is a significant advantage over the Tecno Camon 18’s 18W charging. This means the Note 10 Pro NFC can replenish its battery much faster, reducing downtime and offering a more convenient user experience. A full charge on the Note 10 Pro NFC could take around 60-75 minutes, while the Camon 18 could require over 2 hours.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 18 if you prioritize a simple, reliable experience and aren't heavily invested in demanding mobile gaming. Its efficient Helio G88 is sufficient for everyday tasks. Buy the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC if you frequently game, stream videos, or simply dislike waiting for your phone to charge – the G95 and 33W charging are significant advantages.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G95 in the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC handle demanding games like PUBG Mobile at high settings?
Yes, the Helio G95 is capable of running PUBG Mobile at high settings with playable frame rates. While it won't match flagship-level performance, it provides a significantly smoother experience than the Helio G88, especially during prolonged gaming sessions. Expect to be able to maintain stable frame rates at HD graphics and high frame rate settings.
❓ How much faster is the 33W charging on the Infinix Note 10 Pro NFC compared to the 18W charging on the Tecno Camon 18?
The 33W charging on the Note 10 Pro NFC is considerably faster. While exact times depend on battery level and usage, you can expect a full charge in approximately 60-75 minutes. The Tecno Camon 18’s 18W charging will likely take over 2 hours to fully charge, making the Note 10 Pro NFC a much more convenient option for users who need to quickly top up their battery.
❓ Does the difference between the Cortex-A75 and Cortex-A76 cores in these chipsets really matter for everyday use?
For basic tasks like browsing, social media, and messaging, the difference is minimal. However, the Cortex-A76 cores in the Helio G95 offer a noticeable improvement in responsiveness when multitasking, opening apps, and switching between them. This translates to a smoother and more fluid user experience, especially for power users.
