The Tecno Camon 18 Premier and the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) represent compelling options in the increasingly competitive mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a premium experience without the flagship price tag, they take distinctly different approaches to achieving this, particularly in chipset choice and charging technology. This comparison dissects these differences to help you determine which device best suits your needs.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing fast charging and 5G connectivity, the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G emerges as the stronger contender. Its 67W charging significantly reduces downtime, and the Snapdragon 695 offers a more efficient 5G experience. However, the Tecno Camon 18 Premier’s endurance rating is respectable.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 1900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 8, 40, 41 |
| 5G bands | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 28, 40, 78 SA/NSA |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE, 5G |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE / 5G |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 04 | 2022, March 09 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, October 11 | Available. Released 2022, March 15 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | Glass front, plastic frame, glass back | Glass front (Gorilla Glass 5), glass back |
| Dimensions | 163.8 x 75.9 x 8.2 mm (6.45 x 2.99 x 0.32 in) | 164.2 x 76.1 x 8.1 mm (6.46 x 3.00 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | 200.6 g (7.09 oz) | 202 g (7.13 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Protection | - | Corning Gorilla Glass 5 |
| Resolution | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~393 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~395 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.7 inches, 108.4 cm2 (~87.2% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.67 inches, 107.4 cm2 (~86.0% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | AMOLED, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 120Hz, 700 nits, 1200 nits (peak) |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.2 GHz Kryo 660 Gold & 6x1.7 GHz Kryo 660 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM6375 Snapdragon 695 5G (6 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 619 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 | Android 11, MIUI 13 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | microSDXC (dedicated slot) | microSDXC (uses shared SIM slot) |
| Internal | 256GB 8GB RAM | 64GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM, 256GB 8GB RAM |
| | UFS | - |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 64 MP, f/1.6, 26mm (wide), PDAF
8 MP, f/3.5, 135mm (periscope telephoto), PDAF, 5x optical zoom
12 MP, (ultrawide), gimbal OIS | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.2, 118˚ (ultrawide)
2 MP (macro) |
| Video | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30fps, gyro-EIS | 1080p@30fps |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash, HDR | - |
| Single | 32 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.06" 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30fps |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | - |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes, with stereo speakers |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.1, A2DP, LE |
| Infrared port | - | Yes |
| NFC | Yes | No |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS, GALILEO |
| Radio | FM radio | Unspecified |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired, 64% in 30 min | 67W wired, PD3.0, QC3, 50% in 15 min, 100% in 42 min |
| Type | 4750 mAh | Li-Po 5000 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Polar night, Vast sky | Mirage Blue, Phantom White, Stealth Black |
| Models | CH9, CH9n | 2201116SI |
| Price | About 390 EUR | About 250 EUR |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life |
Endurance rating 112h
| - |
| Camera |
Photo / Video | - |
| Display |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) | - |
| Loudspeaker |
-26.2 LUFS (Good)
| - |
| Performance |
AnTuTu: 293517 (v8), 346389 (v9)
GeekBench: 1758 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 12fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) | - |
Tecno Camon 18 Premier
- Respectable battery endurance (112h rating)
- Potentially lower price point (depending on region)
- Decent performance for everyday tasks
- Older, less efficient chipset (Helio G96)
- Slower charging speed (33W)
- Lacks 5G connectivity
Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India)
- Faster 67W charging with PD3.0/QC3 support
- More efficient and modern chipset (Snapdragon 695)
- 5G connectivity for faster data speeds
- Potentially shorter battery life compared to Tecno
- May be slightly more expensive
- Camera details are limited without further testing
Display Comparison
Both devices lack detailed display specifications beyond the Tecno’s measured 422 nits of max brightness. While the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ likely offers similar brightness, the absence of detailed color accuracy data (like DCI-P3 coverage) makes a direct comparison difficult. The 'Infinite' contrast ratio claim on the Tecno is a marketing term, typical of AMOLED panels, but doesn’t reveal specifics. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ is known to have a 120Hz AMOLED display, which the Tecno lacks, offering a smoother scrolling experience.
Camera Comparison
Both phones emphasize camera capabilities, but detailed sensor information beyond the marketing claims is limited. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ is known for its 108MP main sensor, while the Tecno Camon 18 Premier’s camera is described as 'Photo / Video' without specifics. Without knowing the sensor size, aperture, and image processing algorithms, a definitive camera comparison is challenging. However, the larger sensor size typically found in the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ suggests better low-light performance. The absence of details on OIS (Optical Image Stabilization) on either device makes it difficult to assess video stabilization capabilities.
Performance
The core difference lies in the chipsets. The Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G utilizes the Qualcomm Snapdragon 695 5G (6nm), while the Tecno Camon 18 Premier features the MediaTek Helio G96 (12nm). The Snapdragon 695, built on a smaller 6nm process, inherently offers better power efficiency and thermal management compared to the 12nm Helio G96. While the Helio G96’s Cortex-A76 cores clock slightly higher (2.05 GHz vs 2.2 GHz on the Snapdragon’s Kryo 660 Gold), the architectural advantages of the Snapdragon, coupled with its more efficient process node, translate to sustained performance and reduced throttling during demanding tasks. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ also benefits from 5G connectivity, absent in the Tecno.
Battery Life
The Tecno Camon 18 Premier boasts an endurance rating of 112 hours, indicating respectable battery life. However, the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compensates for potentially lower battery capacity with its significantly faster 67W charging. Reaching 50% charge in just 15 minutes and 100% in 42 minutes is a substantial advantage over the Tecno’s 33W charging, which takes 30 minutes to reach 64%. This difference in charging speed dramatically impacts usability, especially for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 18 Premier if you prioritize long battery life and are less concerned with 5G speeds or extremely rapid charging. It’s a solid choice for users who primarily use their phones for everyday tasks and media consumption. Buy the Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G (India) if you value fast charging, 5G connectivity, and a more modern chipset architecture, making it ideal for users who frequently stream, game, or travel in areas with 5G coverage.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Does the MediaTek Helio G96 in the Tecno Camon 18 Premier struggle with sustained gaming performance?
The Helio G96, while capable, is built on a 12nm process, which means it's more prone to thermal throttling during extended gaming sessions compared to the Snapdragon 695's 6nm process. Expect some performance dips after prolonged gameplay, particularly with graphically demanding titles.
❓ How much faster is the 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G compared to the 33W charging on the Tecno Camon 18 Premier in real-world use?
The 67W charging on the Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G can fully charge the device in approximately 42 minutes, while the Tecno Camon 18 Premier takes considerably longer to reach full charge. This translates to significantly less downtime and a more convenient charging experience, especially for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Is the lack of 5G on the Tecno Camon 18 Premier a significant drawback?
If you live in an area with widespread 5G coverage and frequently use data-intensive applications, the absence of 5G on the Tecno Camon 18 Premier is a notable limitation. The Redmi Note 11 Pro+ 5G offers significantly faster download and upload speeds in 5G areas.
