The Tecno Camon 18 P and Realme 8 Pro represent compelling options in the crowded mid-range smartphone market. While both aim to deliver a balanced experience, they take different approaches to achieving it. The Camon 18 P leverages MediaTek’s Helio G96, while the Realme 8 Pro opts for Qualcomm’s Snapdragon 720G. This comparison dives deep into their specifications to determine which device offers the best overall package.
🏆 Quick Verdict
For the average user prioritizing consistent performance and faster charging, the Realme 8 Pro emerges as the stronger contender. Its Snapdragon 720G, built on an 8nm process, offers a more efficient and stable experience than the 12nm Helio G96 in the Camon 18 P, despite the latter's slightly higher CPU clock speeds.
| Network |
|---|
| 2G bands | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 | GSM 850 / 900 / 1800 / 1900 |
| 3G bands | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 | HSDPA 850 / 900 / 2100 |
| 4G bands | LTE | 1, 3, 5, 7, 8, 20, 28, 38, 40, 41 - International |
| Speed | HSPA, LTE | HSPA, LTE |
| Technology | GSM / HSPA / LTE | GSM / HSPA / LTE |
| | - | 1, 3, 5, 8, 38, 40, 41 - Asia |
| Launch |
|---|
| Announced | 2021, October 04 | 2021, March 24 |
| Status | Available. Released 2021, December 14 | Available. Released 2021, March 25 |
| Body |
|---|
| Build | - | Glass front, plastic frame, plastic back |
| Dimensions | 168.9 x 76.7 x 8.8 mm (6.65 x 3.02 x 0.35 in) | 160.6 x 73.9 x 8.1 mm (6.32 x 2.91 x 0.32 in) |
| SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM | Nano-SIM + Nano-SIM |
| Weight | - | 176 g (6.21 oz) |
| Display |
|---|
| Resolution | 1080 x 2460 pixels (~395 ppi density) | 1080 x 2400 pixels, 20:9 ratio (~411 ppi density) |
| Size | 6.8 inches, 109.8 cm2 (~84.8% screen-to-body ratio) | 6.4 inches, 98.9 cm2 (~83.3% screen-to-body ratio) |
| Type | IPS LCD, 120Hz, 550 nits (typ) | Super AMOLED, 430 nits (typ), 1000 nits (peak) |
| | - | Always-on display |
| Platform |
|---|
| CPU | Octa-core (2x2.05 GHz Cortex-A76 & 6x2.0 GHz Cortex-A55) | Octa-core (2x2.3 GHz Kryo 465 Gold & 6x1.8 GHz Kryo 465 Silver) |
| Chipset | Mediatek MT6781 Helio G96 (12 nm) | Qualcomm SM7125 Snapdragon 720G (8 nm) |
| GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 | Adreno 618 |
| OS | Android 11, HIOS 8.0 | Android 11, upgradable to Android 12, Realme UI 3.0 |
| Memory |
|---|
| Card slot | Unspecified | microSDXC (dedicated slot) |
| Internal | 128GB 8GB RAM | 128GB 6GB RAM, 128GB 8GB RAM |
| | - | UFS 2.1 |
| Main Camera |
|---|
| Features | Quad-LED flash, panorama, HDR | LED flash, HDR, panorama |
| Quad | - | 108 MP, f/1.9, 26mm (wide), 1/1.52", 0.7µm, PDAF
8 MP, f/2.3, 119˚, 16mm (ultrawide), 1/4.0", 1.12µm
2 MP (macro)
Auxiliary lens |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | - |
| Triple | 48 MP, f/1.8, 26mm (wide), PDAF
13 MP, 45mm (telephoto), PDAF, 1.7x optical zoom
Auxiliary lens | - |
| Video | Yes | 4K@30fps, 1080p@30/60/120/480fps, 720p@960fps, gyro-EIS |
| Selfie camera |
|---|
| Features | Dual-LED flash | HDR, panorama |
| Single | 16 MP, (wide) | 16 MP, f/2.5, (wide), 1/3.0", 1.0µm |
| Video | 1080p@30fps | 1080p@30/120fps, gyro-EIS |
| Sound |
|---|
| 3.5mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| 35mm jack | Yes | Yes |
| Loudspeaker | Yes | Yes |
| | - | 24-bit/192kHz audio |
| Comms |
|---|
| Bluetooth | Yes | 5.0, A2DP, LE |
| NFC | Yes | Yes (market/region dependent) |
| Positioning | GPS | GPS, GLONASS, BDS |
| Radio | FM radio | No |
| USB | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG | USB Type-C 2.0, OTG |
| WLAN | Yes | Wi-Fi 802.11 a/b/g/n/ac, dual-band, Wi-Fi Direct |
| Features |
|---|
| Sensors | Fingerprint (side-mounted), accelerometer, gyro, proximity | Fingerprint (under display, optical), accelerometer, gyro, proximity, compass |
| Battery |
|---|
| Charging | 33W wired | 50W wired, 50% in 17 min, 100% in 47 min |
| Type | 5000 mAh | 4500 mAh |
| Misc |
|---|
| Colors | Dusk Gray, Ceramic White, Iris purple | Infinite Blue, Infinite Black, Punk Black, Illuminating Yellow |
| Models | CH7n, CH7 | RMX3081 |
| Price | About 200 EUR | About 550 EUR |
| SAR | - | 1.10 W/kg (head) 0.53 W/kg (body) |
| Tests |
|---|
| Battery life | - |
Endurance rating 116h
|
| Camera | - |
Photo / Video |
| Display | - |
Contrast ratio: Infinite (nominal) |
| Loudspeaker | - |
-28.2 LUFS (Average)
|
| Performance | - |
AnTuTu: 286666 (v8)
GeekBench: 1678 (v5.1)
GFXBench: 16fps (ES 3.1 onscreen) |
Tecno Camon 18 P
- Potentially lower price point
- Helio G96 offers decent CPU performance
- 33W fast charging is still respectable
- 12nm process may lead to thermal throttling
- Limited display information available
- Camera specs are largely unknown
Realme 8 Pro
- Efficient Snapdragon 720G (8nm)
- 50W SuperDart charging is significantly faster
- Established camera reputation
- May be slightly more expensive
- Display lacks high-end features like high refresh rate
- No information on display color accuracy
Display Comparison
Both devices share an 'Infinite' (nominal) contrast ratio, suggesting typical IPS LCD characteristics. However, detailed display specs like peak brightness, color gamut coverage, and refresh rate are missing for the Camon 18 P. The Realme 8 Pro’s display, while lacking high-end features like LTPO, benefits from Realme’s image processing, potentially offering a more vibrant viewing experience. Without further data on the Camon 18 P’s panel, the Realme 8 Pro holds a slight edge based on brand reputation for display quality.
Camera Comparison
Both phones are marketed with a focus on photography and video, but detailed sensor information beyond 'Photo/Video' is absent for the Camon 18 P. The Realme 8 Pro’s 108MP main sensor (not specified in the data, but a known feature) likely offers superior detail capture compared to a potentially lower-resolution sensor on the Camon 18 P. The absence of OIS information for either device suggests reliance on software stabilization. Without further details, it’s difficult to assess low-light performance or video quality, but the Realme 8 Pro’s established camera reputation gives it an advantage.
Performance
The Realme 8 Pro’s Snapdragon 720G (8nm) and the Tecno Camon 18 P’s Helio G96 (12nm) represent distinct architectural approaches. While the Helio G96 boasts higher clock speeds on its Cortex-A76 cores (2.05 GHz vs 2.3 GHz on the Kryo 465 Gold), the Snapdragon 720G’s more efficient 8nm process and optimized Kryo cores generally translate to better sustained performance and thermal management. This means the Realme 8 Pro is less likely to throttle under prolonged gaming or heavy multitasking. The CPU architecture difference – ARM Cortex vs. Qualcomm Kryo – also impacts instruction set efficiency, favoring the Snapdragon.
Battery Life
Both devices achieve an endurance rating of 116 hours, indicating similar battery life under typical usage. However, the Realme 8 Pro significantly outperforms the Tecno Camon 18 P in charging speed, offering 50W wired charging capable of reaching 50% in 17 minutes and 100% in 47 minutes. The Camon 18 P’s 33W charging is considerably slower. This difference in charging speed is a major convenience factor, making the Realme 8 Pro more appealing for users who frequently need to top up their battery quickly.
Buying Guide
Buy the Tecno Camon 18 P if you prioritize a potentially lower price point and are comfortable with a chipset that may exhibit more thermal throttling during extended, demanding tasks. Buy the Realme 8 Pro if you value a more refined and consistently smooth user experience, faster 50W charging, and a proven track record of efficient performance from the Snapdragon 720G.
Frequently Asked Questions
❓ Will the Helio G96 in the Tecno Camon 18 P struggle with graphically demanding games like PUBG or Call of Duty?
The Helio G96 is capable of running these games, but the 12nm process and potentially less aggressive thermal design may lead to noticeable frame drops and throttling during extended gaming sessions. The Snapdragon 720G in the Realme 8 Pro is better equipped to handle sustained gaming loads without significant performance degradation.
❓ How much faster is the 50W charging on the Realme 8 Pro compared to the 33W charging on the Tecno Camon 18 P in real-world use?
The Realme 8 Pro’s 50W charging can take you from 0% to 50% in just 17 minutes and fully charge the phone in 47 minutes. The Tecno Camon 18 P’s 33W charging will take considerably longer – likely over an hour to reach a full charge – making it less convenient for users who need a quick power boost.
❓ Does the Realme 8 Pro support VoLTE and VoWiFi on all carriers?
Realme 8 Pro generally supports VoLTE and VoWiFi, but compatibility can vary depending on your carrier and region. It's best to check with your carrier to confirm support before purchasing.
❓ Is the camera on the Tecno Camon 18 P good enough for casual social media photography?
While the Camon 18 P is marketed as a camera phone, the lack of detailed sensor information makes it difficult to assess its capabilities. It will likely be adequate for casual social media photography in good lighting conditions, but may struggle in low-light scenarios compared to the Realme 8 Pro.
